Visual Attention to Semantic and Orthographic Associations in Fluent Aphasia: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Susan M. DeMetropolis, Andrea Pittarello
{"title":"Visual Attention to Semantic and Orthographic Associations in Fluent Aphasia: Evidence from Eye-Tracking.","authors":"Susan M. DeMetropolis, Andrea Pittarello","doi":"10.1177/00315125241248309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE\nWe examined the allocation of visual attention in an association task by both neurotypical participants (n = 11) and adults with fluent aphasia (n = 12).\n\n\nRESEARCH DESIGN\nParticipants were presented with a picture (e.g., a basket) followed by a semantically related association (i.e., \"strawberry\") and an orthographically related association (i.e., \"b,\" the first letter of \"basket\").\n\n\nANALYSIS\nAn eye tracker recorded their eye movements for three areas of interest (AOI): the picture, the semantic associate, and the orthographic associate, over 1396 observations.\n\n\nRESULTS\nResults showed that both neurotypical participants and participants with aphasia looked longer at the semantic associate than at the picture, and this difference was more pronounced for neurotypicals than for people with aphasia (PWA). Neurotypicals also looked longer than the PWA group at the orthographic associate than at the prior picture. Regarding eye fixation counts, both participant groups looked more frequently at the semantic associate than at either the picture or the orthographic associate. Notably, this pattern was more pronounced among neurotypical participants than PWA.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nOur findings emphasize the importance of semantic associations in fluent aphasia and suggest a potential rehabilitative approach in speech and language therapy.","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125241248309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We examined the allocation of visual attention in an association task by both neurotypical participants (n = 11) and adults with fluent aphasia (n = 12). RESEARCH DESIGN Participants were presented with a picture (e.g., a basket) followed by a semantically related association (i.e., "strawberry") and an orthographically related association (i.e., "b," the first letter of "basket"). ANALYSIS An eye tracker recorded their eye movements for three areas of interest (AOI): the picture, the semantic associate, and the orthographic associate, over 1396 observations. RESULTS Results showed that both neurotypical participants and participants with aphasia looked longer at the semantic associate than at the picture, and this difference was more pronounced for neurotypicals than for people with aphasia (PWA). Neurotypicals also looked longer than the PWA group at the orthographic associate than at the prior picture. Regarding eye fixation counts, both participant groups looked more frequently at the semantic associate than at either the picture or the orthographic associate. Notably, this pattern was more pronounced among neurotypical participants than PWA. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the importance of semantic associations in fluent aphasia and suggest a potential rehabilitative approach in speech and language therapy.
流利性失语症患者对语义和正字法关联的视觉注意:来自眼动跟踪的证据。
背景和目的我们研究了神经畸形参与者(n = 11)和患有流利性失语症的成人(n = 12)在联想任务中的视觉注意力分配情况。研究设计向参与者展示了一幅图片(如一个篮子),随后是语义相关的联想(如 "草莓")和正字法相关的联想(如 "b","篮子 "的第一个字母)、"结果表明,神经典型参与者和失语症参与者看语义联想的时间都长于看图片,而且神经典型参与者的这种差异比失语症患者(PWA)更明显。神经症患者看正字法联想的时间也比看前一幅图片的时间长。在眼睛注视次数方面,两组受试者注视语义联想的次数都多于注视图片或正字法联想的次数。结论我们的发现强调了语义联想在流利性失语症中的重要性,并提出了一种潜在的语言康复治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信