Andrew S. Gallan, Diogo Hildebrand, Yuliya Komarova, Dan Rubin, Ronen Shay
{"title":"Exploring customer engagement tensions when pursuing responsible business practices","authors":"Andrew S. Gallan, Diogo Hildebrand, Yuliya Komarova, Dan Rubin, Ronen Shay","doi":"10.1108/josm-12-2023-0509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Designing and developing responsible business practices can create various tensions for service organizations. The purpose of this research is to develop a deeper understanding of the relationship between customer engagement (CE) and responsible business practices (e.g. environmental, social and/or governance [ESG], corporate social responsibility [CSR] and diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI]) and explore customer engagement tensions that service organizations may face.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This research develops a list of CE-related responsible business practice tensions and empirically explores their relevance through in-depth interviews with nine ESG professionals.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>This paper makes three important contributions. First, we find support for nine distinct but related tensions with implications for CE that organizations must navigate when pursuing responsible business practices. Second, interview participants provide some suggestions for tackling these tensions, which we support with relevant theories. Finally, we develop a conceptual framework that may stimulate future service research and inform the implementation of ESG strategies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is the first to conceptualize and empirically explore the tensions that emerge between responsible business practices and CE. The authors develop a novel analysis of the CE-related tensions that emerge when pursuing an ESG strategy.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The findings are based on a small sample of ESG professionals. Future research may take a quantitative approach to further evaluate the role that these tensions play in engaging customers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This research provides a conceptual framework that may guide ESG professionals in understanding, framing and navigating CE-related tensions when pursuing responsible business practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>A social benefit may be found when service organizations are better able to successfully navigate CE-related tensions when pursuing responsible business practices.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-12-2023-0509","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
Designing and developing responsible business practices can create various tensions for service organizations. The purpose of this research is to develop a deeper understanding of the relationship between customer engagement (CE) and responsible business practices (e.g. environmental, social and/or governance [ESG], corporate social responsibility [CSR] and diversity, equity, and inclusion [DEI]) and explore customer engagement tensions that service organizations may face.
Design/methodology/approach
This research develops a list of CE-related responsible business practice tensions and empirically explores their relevance through in-depth interviews with nine ESG professionals.
Findings
This paper makes three important contributions. First, we find support for nine distinct but related tensions with implications for CE that organizations must navigate when pursuing responsible business practices. Second, interview participants provide some suggestions for tackling these tensions, which we support with relevant theories. Finally, we develop a conceptual framework that may stimulate future service research and inform the implementation of ESG strategies.
Originality/value
To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this research is the first to conceptualize and empirically explore the tensions that emerge between responsible business practices and CE. The authors develop a novel analysis of the CE-related tensions that emerge when pursuing an ESG strategy.
Research limitations/implications
The findings are based on a small sample of ESG professionals. Future research may take a quantitative approach to further evaluate the role that these tensions play in engaging customers.
Practical implications
This research provides a conceptual framework that may guide ESG professionals in understanding, framing and navigating CE-related tensions when pursuing responsible business practices.
Social implications
A social benefit may be found when service organizations are better able to successfully navigate CE-related tensions when pursuing responsible business practices.
目的设计和开发负责任的业务实践可能会给服务机构带来各种矛盾。本研究旨在深入了解客户参与(CE)与负责任的商业实践(如环境、社会和/或治理[ESG]、企业社会责任[CSR]以及多样性、公平性和包容性[DEI])之间的关系,并探讨服务机构可能面临的客户参与紧张关系。本研究制定了一份与客户参与相关的负责任商业实践紧张关系清单,并通过对九位 ESG 专业人士进行深入访谈,实证探讨了这些紧张关系的相关性。首先,我们发现了九种不同但相关的紧张关系,这些紧张关系对行政首长有影响,组织在追求负责任的商业实践时必须加以驾驭。其次,访谈参与者为解决这些矛盾提出了一些建议,我们用相关理论为这些建议提供了支持。最后,我们建立了一个概念框架,可以促进未来的服务研究,并为实施环境、社会和治理战略提供参考。 原创性/价值 据作者所知,这项研究是首次从概念上和经验上探讨负责任的商业实践与行政首长之间出现的紧张关系。作者对在追求 ESG 战略时出现的与 CE 相关的紧张关系进行了新颖的分析。研究局限性/影响研究结果基于 ESG 专业人士的小样本。本研究提供了一个概念框架,可指导环境、社会和公司治理专业人士在追求负责任的商业实践时理解、构建和驾驭与 CE 相关的紧张关系。社会影响当服务机构在追求负责任的商业实践时能够更好地成功驾驭与 CE 相关的紧张关系时,可能会带来社会效益。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.