Insights from Developing and Implementing a Novel School Community Collaborative Model to Promote School Safety*

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Keith L. Hullenaar PhD, Chelsea D. Hicks PhD, MPH, Marcus W. Stubblefield, Lester Herndon (Flip) PhD, Susan K. Seabrooks MPH, Monica S. Vavilala MD, Sharon S. Laing PhD
{"title":"Insights from Developing and Implementing a Novel School Community Collaborative Model to Promote School Safety*","authors":"Keith L. Hullenaar PhD,&nbsp;Chelsea D. Hicks PhD, MPH,&nbsp;Marcus W. Stubblefield,&nbsp;Lester Herndon (Flip) PhD,&nbsp;Susan K. Seabrooks MPH,&nbsp;Monica S. Vavilala MD,&nbsp;Sharon S. Laing PhD","doi":"10.1111/josh.13451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> BACKGROUND</h3>\n \n <p>School Resource Officer (SRO) programs do not reduce school violence and increase school discipline. We describe the use of a culturally responsive framework to form a school community collaborative among students, parents, staff, administrators, and law enforcement to reform an SRO program, promote school safety, and reduce punitive measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> METHODS</h3>\n \n <p>Members of a participating school district, a local county, and a university collaborated. Adapting an identified culturally responsive model, a racially/ethnically diverse school community co-developed and implemented a School Community Collaborative (SCC) to address a school safety priority (SRO program reform). The main outcomes were SCC model development and implementation, policy change, and school community feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> RESULTS</h3>\n \n <p>Sixteen community members participated in the 5-week SCC with students, staff, law enforcement, and parents. The SCC revised the district's SRO memorandum of understanding (MOU) with law enforcement. Participants reported favorable feedback, and 89% reported the inclusion of diverse voices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> CONCLUSIONS</h3>\n \n <p>Co-development and implementation of an SCC process with schools were feasible. School SCC participated in a community-engaged evaluation and revision of an MOU.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josh.13451","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND

School Resource Officer (SRO) programs do not reduce school violence and increase school discipline. We describe the use of a culturally responsive framework to form a school community collaborative among students, parents, staff, administrators, and law enforcement to reform an SRO program, promote school safety, and reduce punitive measures.

METHODS

Members of a participating school district, a local county, and a university collaborated. Adapting an identified culturally responsive model, a racially/ethnically diverse school community co-developed and implemented a School Community Collaborative (SCC) to address a school safety priority (SRO program reform). The main outcomes were SCC model development and implementation, policy change, and school community feedback.

RESULTS

Sixteen community members participated in the 5-week SCC with students, staff, law enforcement, and parents. The SCC revised the district's SRO memorandum of understanding (MOU) with law enforcement. Participants reported favorable feedback, and 89% reported the inclusion of diverse voices.

CONCLUSIONS

Co-development and implementation of an SCC process with schools were feasible. School SCC participated in a community-engaged evaluation and revision of an MOU.

开发和实施新颖的学校社区合作模式以促进学校安全的启示
背景学校治安官(SRO)项目并不能减少校园暴力和加强学校纪律。我们介绍了如何利用文化响应框架,在学生、家长、教职员工、管理人员和执法人员之间形成学校社区合作,改革 SRO 项目,促进学校安全,减少惩罚性措施。一个种族/族裔多元化的学校社区采用一种已确定的文化响应模式,共同开发并实施了学校社区协作项目(School Community Collaborative,SCC),以解决学校安全优先事项(SRO 项目改革)。16 名社区成员与学生、教职员工、执法人员和家长一起参加了为期 5 周的 SCC。SCC 修订了校区与执法部门的 SRO 谅解备忘录 (MOU)。结论与学校共同开发和实施 SCC 流程是可行的。学校 SCC 参与了社区参与的评估和谅解备忘录的修订。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信