Effect of Plant-Based Mung Bean Products on Digestibility and Gut Microbiome Profiling Using In Vitro Fecal Fermentation

IF 3.1 2区 农林科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Nattha Tampanna, Worapanit Chansuwan, Santad Wichienchot
{"title":"Effect of Plant-Based Mung Bean Products on Digestibility and Gut Microbiome Profiling Using In Vitro Fecal Fermentation","authors":"Nattha Tampanna, Worapanit Chansuwan, Santad Wichienchot","doi":"10.1007/s11130-024-01176-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The concept of plant-based protein consumption has been increasing recently because of the growing health consciousness among people. Mung bean is one of the most consumed legumes with a dense nutrient profile. Hence, current research is aimed to study the effect of mung bean protein-based products including mung bean snack (MBS) and textured vegetable protein (TVP) for treatment groups against the control groups, commercial ingredients group consisting of mung bean powder (MBP) and pea powder (PP) and commercial products group include commercial pea texture (cPT) and commercial textured vegetable protein (cTVP) for their proximate composition, digestibility, gut microbial profile and fatty acid metabolite profiling. The MBS and TVP samples had significantly higher digestibility of 74.43% and 73.24% than the commercial products. The protein content of TVP was 0.8 times higher than its commercial control. Gut microbiome profiling showed that all the samples shared around 162 similar genera. Post-fermentation analysis provided promising results by reflecting the growth of beneficial bacteria (<i>Parabacteroides</i>, <i>Bifidobacterium</i> and <i>Lactobacillus</i>) and the suppression of pathogens (<i>Escherichia</i>-<i>Shigella</i>, <i>Dorea</i> and <i>Klebsiella</i>). The dual relationship between gut microbiota and nutrient interaction proved the production of abundant short- and branched-chain fatty acids. The MBS sample was able to produce SCFAs (41.27 mM) significantly and BCFAs (2.02 mM) than the TVP sample (27.58 mM and 2.14 mM, respectively). Hence, our research outcomes proved that the mung bean protein-based products might infer numerous health benefits to the host due to enriched probiotics in the gut and the production of their corresponding metabolites.</p>","PeriodicalId":20092,"journal":{"name":"Plant Foods for Human Nutrition","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Foods for Human Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-024-01176-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of plant-based protein consumption has been increasing recently because of the growing health consciousness among people. Mung bean is one of the most consumed legumes with a dense nutrient profile. Hence, current research is aimed to study the effect of mung bean protein-based products including mung bean snack (MBS) and textured vegetable protein (TVP) for treatment groups against the control groups, commercial ingredients group consisting of mung bean powder (MBP) and pea powder (PP) and commercial products group include commercial pea texture (cPT) and commercial textured vegetable protein (cTVP) for their proximate composition, digestibility, gut microbial profile and fatty acid metabolite profiling. The MBS and TVP samples had significantly higher digestibility of 74.43% and 73.24% than the commercial products. The protein content of TVP was 0.8 times higher than its commercial control. Gut microbiome profiling showed that all the samples shared around 162 similar genera. Post-fermentation analysis provided promising results by reflecting the growth of beneficial bacteria (Parabacteroides, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) and the suppression of pathogens (Escherichia-Shigella, Dorea and Klebsiella). The dual relationship between gut microbiota and nutrient interaction proved the production of abundant short- and branched-chain fatty acids. The MBS sample was able to produce SCFAs (41.27 mM) significantly and BCFAs (2.02 mM) than the TVP sample (27.58 mM and 2.14 mM, respectively). Hence, our research outcomes proved that the mung bean protein-based products might infer numerous health benefits to the host due to enriched probiotics in the gut and the production of their corresponding metabolites.

Abstract Image

利用体外粪便发酵法分析植物性绿豆产品对消化率和肠道微生物组的影响
由于人们的健康意识不断提高,以植物为基础的蛋白质消费概念近来也在不断增加。绿豆是食用量最大的豆类之一,具有丰富的营养成分。因此,目前的研究旨在研究绿豆蛋白基产品(包括绿豆点心(MBS)和质构植物蛋白(TVP))对对照组、商业配料组(包括绿豆粉(MBP)和豌豆粉(PP))和商业产品组(包括商业豌豆质构(cPT)和商业质构植物蛋白(cTVP))的近似成分、消化率、肠道微生物谱和脂肪酸代谢物谱分析的影响。MBS 和 TVP 样品的消化率分别为 74.43% 和 73.24%,明显高于市售产品。TVP 的蛋白质含量是其商品对照的 0.8 倍。肠道微生物组分析表明,所有样品都有大约 162 个相似的菌属。发酵后分析结果令人鼓舞,反映出有益菌(副乳杆菌、双歧杆菌和乳酸杆菌)的生长和病原体(志贺氏菌、多雷氏菌和克雷伯氏菌)的抑制。肠道微生物群与营养物质相互作用的双重关系证明,肠道微生物群能产生丰富的短链和支链脂肪酸。与 TVP 样品(分别为 27.58 毫摩尔和 2.14 毫摩尔)相比,MBS 样品能显著产生 SCFAs(41.27 毫摩尔)和 BCFAs(2.02 毫摩尔)。因此,我们的研究结果证明,以绿豆蛋白为基础的产品可通过丰富肠道益生菌及其相应代谢产物的产生,为宿主的健康带来诸多益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition
Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.50%
发文量
89
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Plant Foods for Human Nutrition (previously Qualitas Plantarum) is an international journal that publishes reports of original research and critical reviews concerned with the improvement and evaluation of the nutritional quality of plant foods for humans, as they are influenced by: - Biotechnology (all fields, including molecular biology and genetic engineering) - Food science and technology - Functional, nutraceutical or pharma foods - Other nutrients and non-nutrients inherent in plant foods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信