Examining the training design and training transfer of a boundary management training: A randomized controlled intervention study

IF 4.9 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Kathrin Reinke, Sandra Ohly
{"title":"Examining the training design and training transfer of a boundary management training: A randomized controlled intervention study","authors":"Kathrin Reinke,&nbsp;Sandra Ohly","doi":"10.1111/joop.12497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In our mobile working world, boundaries between work and non-work domains are more and more blurred, which can impair professionals' recovery and well-being. Consequently, managing work–non-work boundaries represents an important challenge for professionals. Research suggests that boundary work tactics conveyed in boundary management interventions may promote recovery and well-being. However, the efficacy of boundary work tactics is largely unknown, as well as theoretical mechanisms that may explain the effectiveness of boundary management interventions in regard of both training design and training transfer. Building on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation, we develop a web-based boundary management training. Based on the integrated training transfer and effectiveness model, we evaluate its effects on the three levels of training effectiveness: (1) perceived learning, (2) cognitions and behaviours, with boundary control and boundary creation as indicators, and (3) recovery and well-being. Results of our randomized controlled intervention study show several expected changes in boundary creation, suggesting that drawing on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation for training design can result in effective behaviour change. Intervention effects on recovery and well-being are more ambiguous, hinting at the power but likewise potential limitations of boundary creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","volume":"97 3","pages":"864-888"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joop.12497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joop.12497","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our mobile working world, boundaries between work and non-work domains are more and more blurred, which can impair professionals' recovery and well-being. Consequently, managing work–non-work boundaries represents an important challenge for professionals. Research suggests that boundary work tactics conveyed in boundary management interventions may promote recovery and well-being. However, the efficacy of boundary work tactics is largely unknown, as well as theoretical mechanisms that may explain the effectiveness of boundary management interventions in regard of both training design and training transfer. Building on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation, we develop a web-based boundary management training. Based on the integrated training transfer and effectiveness model, we evaluate its effects on the three levels of training effectiveness: (1) perceived learning, (2) cognitions and behaviours, with boundary control and boundary creation as indicators, and (3) recovery and well-being. Results of our randomized controlled intervention study show several expected changes in boundary creation, suggesting that drawing on the social cognitive theory of self-regulation for training design can result in effective behaviour change. Intervention effects on recovery and well-being are more ambiguous, hinting at the power but likewise potential limitations of boundary creation.

Abstract Image

研究边界管理培训的培训设计和培训转移:随机对照干预研究
在我们这个流动的工作世界里,工作与非工作领域之间的界限越来越模糊,这可能会损害专业人员的康复和福祉。因此,管理好工作与非工作的界限是专业人员面临的一项重要挑战。研究表明,边界管理干预中传达的边界工作策略可以促进康复和幸福。然而,人们对边界工作策略的有效性以及边界管理干预在培训设计和培训转移方面的有效性的理论机制还知之甚少。基于自我调节的社会认知理论,我们开发了基于网络的边界管理培训。基于综合培训转移和效果模型,我们评估了其对培训效果三个层面的影响:(1)感知学习;(2)认知和行为(以边界控制和边界创建为指标);(3)恢复和幸福感。我们的随机对照干预研究结果表明,在创建边界方面出现了一些预期的变化,这表明在培训设计中借鉴自我调节的社会认知理论可以有效地改变行为。对康复和幸福感的干预效果则较为模糊,这表明了边界创建的力量,但同样也存在潜在的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology aims to increase understanding of people and organisations at work including: - industrial, organizational, work, vocational and personnel psychology - behavioural and cognitive aspects of industrial relations - ergonomics and human factors Innovative or interdisciplinary approaches with a psychological emphasis are particularly welcome. So are papers which develop the links between occupational/organisational psychology and other areas of the discipline, such as social and cognitive psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信