Health sciences students' perspectives on online teaching and learning: Extending the implications beyond the COVID-19 pandemic

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Milena Kovačević, Nevena Ivanović, Ana Protić, Danijela Milenković, Zoran Mandinić, Dragana Puzović, Miloš Bajčetić, Dušan Popadić, Jelena Parojčić, Anđelija Malenović
{"title":"Health sciences students' perspectives on online teaching and learning: Extending the implications beyond the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Milena Kovačević,&nbsp;Nevena Ivanović,&nbsp;Ana Protić,&nbsp;Danijela Milenković,&nbsp;Zoran Mandinić,&nbsp;Dragana Puzović,&nbsp;Miloš Bajčetić,&nbsp;Dušan Popadić,&nbsp;Jelena Parojčić,&nbsp;Anđelija Malenović","doi":"10.1111/ejed.12660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Digital transformation in education and relevant calls for action are recognised global priorities aimed to support education and training in the digital age. The experiences from the emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic and recent research findings reveal relevant advantages, challenges, as well as different students and teaching staff perspectives which should be carefully considered and integrated into institutional strategies and policies to improve and enrich students’ learning experience. The present study aimed to explore health sciences students' perspectives on online teaching and learning (T&amp;L) in four domains—<i>Satisfaction, Motivation, Interaction and Challenges</i>, and to identify the preferred T&amp;L models or tools. A total of 1,041 responses were collected, including 476 dental medicine (45.7%), 399 pharmacy (38.3%), and 166 medical students (15.9%). Overall <i>Satisfaction</i> was quite high (4.0 ± 1.2; out of 5), followed by satisfactory <i>Interaction</i> (3.4 ± 1.4), whereas <i>Motivation</i> was quite low on average (3.0 ± 1.5). <i>Challenges</i> in online T&amp;L were not markedly expressed (3.0 ± 1.6). The majority of students (46.6%) opted for the blended model as the preferred T&amp;L model. Moodle lessons were perceived as the most useful online T&amp;L tool (45.5% of students), followed by video materials (32.2%). Other T&amp;L tools which require more active student's role, such as short test/quiz, and group or team assignment were declared as less favourable. The findings from the current study may contribute to raising the awareness of academic staff and higher institutions management about the student attitudes and needs related to online T&amp;L and inform institutional planning, decision-making and policy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47585,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejed.12660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital transformation in education and relevant calls for action are recognised global priorities aimed to support education and training in the digital age. The experiences from the emergency remote teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic and recent research findings reveal relevant advantages, challenges, as well as different students and teaching staff perspectives which should be carefully considered and integrated into institutional strategies and policies to improve and enrich students’ learning experience. The present study aimed to explore health sciences students' perspectives on online teaching and learning (T&L) in four domains—Satisfaction, Motivation, Interaction and Challenges, and to identify the preferred T&L models or tools. A total of 1,041 responses were collected, including 476 dental medicine (45.7%), 399 pharmacy (38.3%), and 166 medical students (15.9%). Overall Satisfaction was quite high (4.0 ± 1.2; out of 5), followed by satisfactory Interaction (3.4 ± 1.4), whereas Motivation was quite low on average (3.0 ± 1.5). Challenges in online T&L were not markedly expressed (3.0 ± 1.6). The majority of students (46.6%) opted for the blended model as the preferred T&L model. Moodle lessons were perceived as the most useful online T&L tool (45.5% of students), followed by video materials (32.2%). Other T&L tools which require more active student's role, such as short test/quiz, and group or team assignment were declared as less favourable. The findings from the current study may contribute to raising the awareness of academic staff and higher institutions management about the student attitudes and needs related to online T&L and inform institutional planning, decision-making and policy development.

健康科学专业学生对在线教学的看法:超越 COVID-19 大流行的影响
教育数字化转型和相关行动呼吁是公认的全球优先事项,旨在支持数字化时代的教育和培训。COVID-19 大流行期间的紧急远程教学经验和最近的研究成果揭示了相关的优势、挑战以及学生和教职员工的不同观点,应仔细考虑并将其纳入机构战略和政策,以改善和丰富学生的学习体验。本研究旨在从满意度、动力、互动和挑战四个方面探讨健康科学专业学生对在线教学(T&L)的看法,并确定首选的 T&L 模式或工具。共收集到 1,041 份回复,其中包括 476 名牙科医学专业学生(45.7%)、399 名药学专业学生(38.3%)和 166 名医学专业学生(15.9%)。总体满意度相当高(4.0 ± 1.2;满分 5 分),其次是互动满意度(3.4 ± 1.4),而动机平均相当低(3.0 ± 1.5)。在线学习中遇到的挑战并不明显(3.0 ± 1.6)。大多数学生(46.6%)选择混合模式作为首选教学模式。Moodle课程被认为是最有用的在线教学工具(45.5%的学生),其次是视频材料(32.2%)。其他需要学生扮演更积极角色的教学与学习工具,如简短测试/测验、小组或团队作业等,则不太受欢迎。本次研究的结果有助于提高学术人员和高等院校管理层对学生在线学习态度和需求的认识,并为院校规划、决策和政策制定提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Education
European Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: The prime aims of the European Journal of Education are: - To examine, compare and assess education policies, trends, reforms and programmes of European countries in an international perspective - To disseminate policy debates and research results to a wide audience of academics, researchers, practitioners and students of education sciences - To contribute to the policy debate at the national and European level by providing European administrators and policy-makers in international organisations, national and local governments with comparative and up-to-date material centred on specific themes of common interest.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信