How and when effective customer journeys drive brand loyalty: the role of consumer-brand identification

IF 7.8 2区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Bernd F. Reitsamer, Nicola E. Stokburger-Sauer, Janina S. Kuhnle
{"title":"How and when effective customer journeys drive brand loyalty: the role of consumer-brand identification","authors":"Bernd F. Reitsamer, Nicola E. Stokburger-Sauer, Janina S. Kuhnle","doi":"10.1108/josm-08-2023-0374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Effective customer journey design (ECJD) is considered a key variable in customer experience management and an essential source of brand meaning and pro-brand behavior. Although previous research has confirmed its importance for driving brand attitudes and loyalty, the role of consumer-brand identification as a social identity-based influence in this relationship has not yet been discussed. Drawing on construal level and social identity theories, this paper aims to investigate whether effective journeys and the resulting overall journey experience are equally powerful in driving brand loyalty among customers with different levels of consumer-brand identification.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The present article develops and tests a research model using data from the European and US service sectors (<em>N</em> = 1,454) to investigate how and when ECJD affects service brand loyalty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Across two cultural contexts, four service industries and 33 service brands, the results reveal that ECJD is a crucial driver of service brand loyalty for customers with low consumer-brand identification. Moreover, the findings show that different aspects of journey effectiveness positively impact the valence of customers’ experience related to those journeys – a process that is ultimately decisive for their brand loyalty.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is unique because it generates theoretical and practical knowledge by combining the literature streams of customer journey design, customer experience and branding. Furthermore, this work demonstrates that consumer-brand identification is a critical boundary condition to be considered in the relationship between ECJD and brand loyalty in services.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48089,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Management","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/josm-08-2023-0374","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Effective customer journey design (ECJD) is considered a key variable in customer experience management and an essential source of brand meaning and pro-brand behavior. Although previous research has confirmed its importance for driving brand attitudes and loyalty, the role of consumer-brand identification as a social identity-based influence in this relationship has not yet been discussed. Drawing on construal level and social identity theories, this paper aims to investigate whether effective journeys and the resulting overall journey experience are equally powerful in driving brand loyalty among customers with different levels of consumer-brand identification.

Design/methodology/approach

The present article develops and tests a research model using data from the European and US service sectors (N = 1,454) to investigate how and when ECJD affects service brand loyalty.

Findings

Across two cultural contexts, four service industries and 33 service brands, the results reveal that ECJD is a crucial driver of service brand loyalty for customers with low consumer-brand identification. Moreover, the findings show that different aspects of journey effectiveness positively impact the valence of customers’ experience related to those journeys – a process that is ultimately decisive for their brand loyalty.

Originality/value

This study is unique because it generates theoretical and practical knowledge by combining the literature streams of customer journey design, customer experience and branding. Furthermore, this work demonstrates that consumer-brand identification is a critical boundary condition to be considered in the relationship between ECJD and brand loyalty in services.

有效的顾客旅程如何以及何时推动品牌忠诚度:消费者-品牌认同的作用
目的有效的顾客旅程设计(ECJD)被认为是顾客体验管理的关键变量,也是品牌意义和亲品牌行为的重要来源。尽管以往的研究已经证实了其在推动品牌态度和忠诚度方面的重要性,但消费者-品牌认同作为一种基于社会认同的影响因素在这一关系中的作用尚未得到讨论。本文以构想水平和社会认同理论为基础,旨在研究有效的旅程和由此产生的整体旅程体验是否对具有不同消费者品牌认同水平的顾客的品牌忠诚度具有同等的推动作用。研究结果在两种文化背景、四个服务行业和 33 个服务品牌中,研究结果显示,对于消费者品牌认同度较低的顾客而言,ECJD 是服务品牌忠诚度的重要驱动力。此外,研究结果表明,旅程有效性的不同方面会对顾客与这些旅程相关的体验的价值产生积极影响,而这一过程最终会对顾客的品牌忠诚度产生决定性影响。 原创性/价值这项研究的独特之处在于,它通过结合顾客旅程设计、顾客体验和品牌建设等文献流,产生了理论和实践知识。此外,这项研究还表明,在服务业的顾客旅程设计与品牌忠诚度之间的关系中,消费者对品牌的认同是一个需要考虑的关键边界条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Service Management (JOSM) centers its scope on research in service management. It disseminates papers showcasing distinctive and noteworthy contributions to service literature, serving as a communication platform for individuals in the service management field, transcending disciplines, functional areas, sectors, and nationalities. The journal publishes double-blind reviewed papers emphasizing service literature/theory and its practical applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信