Examination of sensory reception and integration abilities in children with and without Prader-Willi syndrome

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Debra J. Rose , Diobel M. Castner , Kathleen S. Wilson , Daniela A. Rubin
{"title":"Examination of sensory reception and integration abilities in children with and without Prader-Willi syndrome","authors":"Debra J. Rose ,&nbsp;Diobel M. Castner ,&nbsp;Kathleen S. Wilson ,&nbsp;Daniela A. Rubin","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Good postural stability control is dependent upon the complex integration of incoming sensory information (visual, somatosensory, vestibular) with neuromotor responses that are constructed in advance of a voluntary action or in response to an unexpected perturbation.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To examine whether differences exist in how sensory inputs are used to control standing balance in children with and without Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Procedures</h3><p>In this cross-sectional study, 18 children with PWS and 51 children categorized as obese but without PWS (without PWS) ages 8–11 completed the Sensory Organization Test®. This test measures the relative contributions of vision, somatosensory, and vestibular inputs to the control of standing balance. The composite equilibrium score (CES) derived from performance in all sensory conditions, in addition to equilibrium scores (EQs) and falls per condition were compared between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Outcomes and Results</h3><p>The CES was lower for children with PWS compared to children without PWS (M=53.93, SD=14.56 vs. M=66.17, SD=9.89, <em>p</em> = .001) while EQs declined in both groups between conditions 1 and 4 (<em>F</em> (1.305, 66.577) = 71.381, <em>p</em> &lt; .001). No group differences in the percent of falls were evident in condition 5 but more children with PWS fell in condition 6 (χ<sup>2</sup> (1) = 7.468, <em>p</em> = .006). Group differences in frequency of repeated falls also approached significance in conditions 5 (χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 4.630, <em>p</em> = .099) and 6 (χ<sup>2</sup> (3) = 5.167, <em>p</em> = .076).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Implications</h3><p>Children with PWS demonstrated a lower overall level of postural control and increased sway when compared to children with obesity. Both the higher incidence and repeated nature of falls in children with PWS in conditions 5 and 6 suggest an inability to adapt to sensory conditions in which vestibular input must be prioritized. Postural control training programs in this population should include activities that improve their ability to appropriately weight sensory information in changing sensory environments, with a particular focus on the vestibular system.</p></div><div><h3>What does this study add?</h3><p>This study shows that children with PWS demonstrate a lower level of postural stability. The results suggest that children with PWS show inability to adapt to sensory conditions that require prioritizing vestibular information to maintain postural control. This information can be used to help guide training programs in this population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000623/pdfft?md5=1f8014aa78f08d7368629c635206c837&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000623-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Good postural stability control is dependent upon the complex integration of incoming sensory information (visual, somatosensory, vestibular) with neuromotor responses that are constructed in advance of a voluntary action or in response to an unexpected perturbation.

Aims

To examine whether differences exist in how sensory inputs are used to control standing balance in children with and without Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS).

Methods and Procedures

In this cross-sectional study, 18 children with PWS and 51 children categorized as obese but without PWS (without PWS) ages 8–11 completed the Sensory Organization Test®. This test measures the relative contributions of vision, somatosensory, and vestibular inputs to the control of standing balance. The composite equilibrium score (CES) derived from performance in all sensory conditions, in addition to equilibrium scores (EQs) and falls per condition were compared between groups.

Outcomes and Results

The CES was lower for children with PWS compared to children without PWS (M=53.93, SD=14.56 vs. M=66.17, SD=9.89, p = .001) while EQs declined in both groups between conditions 1 and 4 (F (1.305, 66.577) = 71.381, p < .001). No group differences in the percent of falls were evident in condition 5 but more children with PWS fell in condition 6 (χ2 (1) = 7.468, p = .006). Group differences in frequency of repeated falls also approached significance in conditions 5 (χ2 (3) = 4.630, p = .099) and 6 (χ2 (3) = 5.167, p = .076).

Conclusions and Implications

Children with PWS demonstrated a lower overall level of postural control and increased sway when compared to children with obesity. Both the higher incidence and repeated nature of falls in children with PWS in conditions 5 and 6 suggest an inability to adapt to sensory conditions in which vestibular input must be prioritized. Postural control training programs in this population should include activities that improve their ability to appropriately weight sensory information in changing sensory environments, with a particular focus on the vestibular system.

What does this study add?

This study shows that children with PWS demonstrate a lower level of postural stability. The results suggest that children with PWS show inability to adapt to sensory conditions that require prioritizing vestibular information to maintain postural control. This information can be used to help guide training programs in this population.

检查患有和未患有普拉德-威利综合征儿童的感觉接收和整合能力
背景良好的姿势稳定性控制取决于传入的感觉信息(视觉、体感、前庭)与神经运动反应的复杂整合,而神经运动反应是在自愿行动之前或在对意外干扰做出反应时构建的。方法和程序在这项横断面研究中,18 名患有普拉德-威利综合征(PWS)的儿童和 51 名被归类为肥胖但未患有普拉德-威利综合征(PWS)的 8-11 岁儿童完成了感觉组织测试®。该测试测量视觉、体感和前庭输入对站立平衡控制的相对贡献。根据所有感官条件下的表现得出的综合平衡得分(CES),以及平衡得分(EQ)和每种条件下的跌倒情况,在各组之间进行了比较。结果与成果与非PWS儿童相比,PWS儿童的CES较低(M=53.93,SD=14.56 vs. M=66.17,SD=9.89,p = .001),而两组儿童的EQ在条件1和条件4之间均有所下降(F (1.305, 66.577) = 71.381,p <.001)。在条件 5 中,摔倒的百分比没有明显的组间差异,但在条件 6 中,更多患有 PWS 的儿童摔倒(χ2 (1) = 7.468,p = .006)。在条件 5 (χ2 (3) = 4.630, p = .099) 和条件 6 (χ2 (3) = 5.167, p = .076)中,重复跌倒频率的组间差异也接近显著性。在条件 5 和条件 6 中,PWS 患儿跌倒的发生率较高且反复发生,这表明他们无法适应前庭输入必须优先考虑的感官条件。针对这类人群的姿势控制训练计划应包括提高他们在不断变化的感官环境中适当权衡感官信息的能力的活动,尤其要关注前庭系统。研究结果表明,PWS 患儿无法适应需要优先考虑前庭信息以保持姿势控制的感官环境。这些信息可用于指导该人群的训练计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信