Parenting and Queer Youth Mental Health and Substance Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 4.7 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Melissa A. Lippold, William Hall, Denise Yookong Williams, Melissa Jenkins, Hayden Dawes, Roger Mills-Koonce
{"title":"Parenting and Queer Youth Mental Health and Substance Use: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Melissa A. Lippold,&nbsp;William Hall,&nbsp;Denise Yookong Williams,&nbsp;Melissa Jenkins,&nbsp;Hayden Dawes,&nbsp;Roger Mills-Koonce","doi":"10.1007/s40894-024-00232-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Queer youth (those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, and other identities) have higher rates of mental health and substance use challenges than their heterosexual peers yet there has not been a recent systematic review on how parenting may reduce risk for these challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes recent evidence on the relationships between parenting and queer youth (ages 12–25) mental health and substance use. Using PRISMA 2020 standards, 24 studies were identified for review, 15 of which were included in a meta-analysis on the effects of parental support and rejection. Most studies were cross-sectional. Greater parental support and less parental rejection were both associated with fewer internalizing problems and substance use. The meta-analysis found that the effects of parental rejection on youth mental health were stronger than those of support. Only 3 studies examined other aspects of parenting and 5 examined parenting as a buffer against the effects of stress. Measures of parenting, especially parental support, were inconsistent across studies and often focused on general support rather than support specific to queer youth identities. Expanded conceptual models and measures are needed that capture the nuanced ways that parents may affirm queer youth identity and promote queer youth well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"10 1","pages":"145 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-024-00232-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Queer youth (those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, queer, and other identities) have higher rates of mental health and substance use challenges than their heterosexual peers yet there has not been a recent systematic review on how parenting may reduce risk for these challenges. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizes recent evidence on the relationships between parenting and queer youth (ages 12–25) mental health and substance use. Using PRISMA 2020 standards, 24 studies were identified for review, 15 of which were included in a meta-analysis on the effects of parental support and rejection. Most studies were cross-sectional. Greater parental support and less parental rejection were both associated with fewer internalizing problems and substance use. The meta-analysis found that the effects of parental rejection on youth mental health were stronger than those of support. Only 3 studies examined other aspects of parenting and 5 examined parenting as a buffer against the effects of stress. Measures of parenting, especially parental support, were inconsistent across studies and often focused on general support rather than support specific to queer youth identities. Expanded conceptual models and measures are needed that capture the nuanced ways that parents may affirm queer youth identity and promote queer youth well-being.

Abstract Image

为人父母与同性恋青少年的心理健康和药物使用:系统回顾和元分析
酷儿青年(那些认为自己是女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、泛性恋、酷儿和其他身份的人)比他们的异性恋同龄人有更高的心理健康和药物使用挑战的比例,但最近还没有关于养育子女如何降低这些挑战风险的系统综述。这篇系统综述和荟萃分析综合了最近关于父母教养与酷儿青年(12-25岁)心理健康和药物使用之间关系的证据。使用PRISMA 2020标准,确定了24项研究进行审查,其中15项纳入了关于父母支持和拒绝影响的荟萃分析。大多数研究是横断面的。更多的父母支持和更少的父母拒绝都与更少的内化问题和药物使用有关。荟萃分析发现,父母拒绝对青少年心理健康的影响大于支持。只有3项研究考察了育儿的其他方面,5项研究考察了育儿对压力影响的缓冲作用。在不同的研究中,育儿的衡量标准,尤其是父母的支持,是不一致的,而且往往侧重于一般的支持,而不是针对酷儿青年身份的具体支持。需要扩展的概念模型和措施来捕捉父母可能肯定酷儿青年身份和促进酷儿青年福祉的微妙方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信