Stimulus shapes strategy: Effects of stimulus characteristics and individual differences in academic achievement on the neural mechanisms engaged during the N-back task

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Daniel R. Leopold , Hyojeong Kim , Kenneth W. Carlson , Mikaela A. Rowe , Boman R. Groff , Moriah P. Major , Erik G. Willcutt , Laurie E. Cutting , Marie T. Banich
{"title":"Stimulus shapes strategy: Effects of stimulus characteristics and individual differences in academic achievement on the neural mechanisms engaged during the N-back task","authors":"Daniel R. Leopold ,&nbsp;Hyojeong Kim ,&nbsp;Kenneth W. Carlson ,&nbsp;Mikaela A. Rowe ,&nbsp;Boman R. Groff ,&nbsp;Moriah P. Major ,&nbsp;Erik G. Willcutt ,&nbsp;Laurie E. Cutting ,&nbsp;Marie T. Banich","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This fMRI study of 126 youth explored whether the neural mechanisms underlying the N-back task, commonly used to examine executive control over the contents of working memory, are associated with individual differences in academic achievement in reading and math. Moreover, the study explored whether these relationships occur regardless of the nature of the stimulus being manipulated in working memory (letters, numbers, nonsense shapes) or whether these relationships are specific to achievement domain and stimulus type (i.e., letters for reading and numbers for math). The results indicated that higher academic achievement in each of reading and math was associated with greater activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the N-back task regardless of stimulus type (i.e., did not differ for letters and numbers), suggesting that at least some aspects of the neural mechanisms underlying these academic domains are executive in nature. In addition, regardless of level of academic achievement, prefrontal regions were engaged to a greater degree for letters than numbers than nonsense shapes. In contrast, nonsense shapes yielded greater hippocampal activation than letters and numbers. Potential reasons for this pattern of findings are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000331/pdfft?md5=6d81ac385d92769cbba7b07004e77bfa&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000331-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This fMRI study of 126 youth explored whether the neural mechanisms underlying the N-back task, commonly used to examine executive control over the contents of working memory, are associated with individual differences in academic achievement in reading and math. Moreover, the study explored whether these relationships occur regardless of the nature of the stimulus being manipulated in working memory (letters, numbers, nonsense shapes) or whether these relationships are specific to achievement domain and stimulus type (i.e., letters for reading and numbers for math). The results indicated that higher academic achievement in each of reading and math was associated with greater activation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the N-back task regardless of stimulus type (i.e., did not differ for letters and numbers), suggesting that at least some aspects of the neural mechanisms underlying these academic domains are executive in nature. In addition, regardless of level of academic achievement, prefrontal regions were engaged to a greater degree for letters than numbers than nonsense shapes. In contrast, nonsense shapes yielded greater hippocampal activation than letters and numbers. Potential reasons for this pattern of findings are discussed.

刺激塑造策略:刺激特征和学习成绩的个体差异对 N-回溯任务中神经机制的影响
这项对 126 名青少年进行的 fMRI 研究探讨了 N-后退任务(通常用于检查对工作记忆内容的执行控制)的神经机制是否与阅读和数学学习成绩的个体差异有关。此外,该研究还探讨了这些关系的发生是否与工作记忆中被操纵的刺激物(字母、数字、无意义图形)的性质无关,或者这些关系是否与成绩领域和刺激物类型(即阅读中的字母和数学中的数字)有关。研究结果表明,无论刺激类型如何(即字母和数字没有差异),阅读和数学成绩越高,N-back 任务中背外侧前额叶皮层的激活程度就越高(即字母和数字没有差异),这表明这些学术领域的神经机制至少在某些方面具有执行性。此外,无论学习成绩高低,前额叶区域对字母的参与程度都高于对数字的参与程度,也高于对无意义图形的参与程度。相反,与字母和数字相比,无意义图形对海马区的激活程度更高。本文讨论了这种发现模式的潜在原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信