A quantitative case study of secondary school students’ level of statistical thinking

Q1 Mathematics
Salbiah Mohamad Hasim, Roslinda Rosli, Lilia Halim
{"title":"A quantitative case study of secondary school students’ level of statistical thinking","authors":"Salbiah Mohamad Hasim, Roslinda Rosli, Lilia Halim","doi":"10.29333/ejmste/14358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 21st century, statistical thinking has become necessary for all citizens as this skill is vital for societal literacy. Students with statistical thinking will grasp and apply the problem’s context to develop research and draw conclusions, as well as the coherence of the whole process from asking questions to collecting data, evaluating, and testing hypotheses. Although statistical thinking is increasingly in demand in various emerging vocations, students and teachers find statistics challenging to understand. Thus, the study examines the level of statistical thinking of the process of describing data, organizing and reducing data, representing data, and analyzing and interpreting data among high school students based on gender. The statistical thinking test modification of the framework validation test, code, and subprocess reference was used to collect research data from 35 grade 10 students. The research data were statistically analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23 software through descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically an independent t-test analysis. The findings revealed that none of the students achieved an analytical level of understanding; instead, their general statistical thinking skills were at the transitional level, followed by the idiosyncratic and quantitative levels. The findings also demonstrated no statistically significant gender-related disparities in students’ statistical thinking. The study proposes several recommendations, including the necessity of connecting statistical activities to the reality of students’ life and area of study and emphasizing practical rather than theoretical aspects.","PeriodicalId":35438,"journal":{"name":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"1 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 21st century, statistical thinking has become necessary for all citizens as this skill is vital for societal literacy. Students with statistical thinking will grasp and apply the problem’s context to develop research and draw conclusions, as well as the coherence of the whole process from asking questions to collecting data, evaluating, and testing hypotheses. Although statistical thinking is increasingly in demand in various emerging vocations, students and teachers find statistics challenging to understand. Thus, the study examines the level of statistical thinking of the process of describing data, organizing and reducing data, representing data, and analyzing and interpreting data among high school students based on gender. The statistical thinking test modification of the framework validation test, code, and subprocess reference was used to collect research data from 35 grade 10 students. The research data were statistically analyzed using the statistical package for social sciences version 23 software through descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically an independent t-test analysis. The findings revealed that none of the students achieved an analytical level of understanding; instead, their general statistical thinking skills were at the transitional level, followed by the idiosyncratic and quantitative levels. The findings also demonstrated no statistically significant gender-related disparities in students’ statistical thinking. The study proposes several recommendations, including the necessity of connecting statistical activities to the reality of students’ life and area of study and emphasizing practical rather than theoretical aspects.
中学生统计思维水平的定量案例研究
在 21 世纪,统计思维已成为所有公民的必备技能,因为这项技能对社会素养至关重要。具备统计思维的学生将掌握并运用问题的背景来开展研究和得出结论,以及从提出问题到收集数据、评估和检验假设的整个过程的连贯性。虽然各种新兴职业对统计思维的需求越来越大,但学生和教师都认为理解统计具有挑战性。因此,本研究根据性别考察了高中生在描述数据、组织和还原数据、表示数据以及分析和解释数据等过程中的统计思维水平。统计思维测试修改了框架验证测试、代码和子过程参考,用于收集 35 名 10 年级学生的研究数据。研究数据通过描述性和推论性统计,特别是独立 t 检验分析,使用社会科学统计软件包 23 版进行统计分析。研究结果显示,没有一名学生达到了分析性理解水平;相反,他们的一般统计思维能力处于过渡水平,其次是特异性和定量水平。研究结果还表明,在统计思维方面,学生没有明显的性别差异。研究提出了若干建议,包括必须将统计活动与学生的生活和学习领域的实际情况联系起来,强调实践而非理论方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year. The Journal is an Open Access Journal. The Journal strictly adheres to the principles of the peer review process. The EJMSTE Journal publishes original articles in the following areas: -Mathematics Education: Algebra Education, Geometry Education, Math Education, Statistics Education. -Science Education: Astronomy Education, Biology Education, Chemistry Education, Geographical and Environmental Education, Geoscience Education, Physics Education, Sustainability Education. -Engineering Education -STEM Education -Technology Education: Human Computer Interactions, Knowledge Management, Learning Management Systems, Distance Education, E-Learning, Blended Learning, ICT/Moodle in Education, Web 2.0 Tools for Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信