Determination, distribution, and health risk assessment of 12 heavy metals in various edible oils in Taiwan

JSFA reports Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1002/jsf2.186
Shu-Ting Lin, Kai-Wei Liao, Tan-Chui Xuan, Tai-Ying Chiou, Zih-Ee Lin, Wei-Ju Lee
{"title":"Determination, distribution, and health risk assessment of 12 heavy metals in various edible oils in Taiwan","authors":"Shu-Ting Lin,&nbsp;Kai-Wei Liao,&nbsp;Tan-Chui Xuan,&nbsp;Tai-Ying Chiou,&nbsp;Zih-Ee Lin,&nbsp;Wei-Ju Lee","doi":"10.1002/jsf2.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Minimizing the risk of heavy metal pollution is of utmost importance to ensure consumer safety. In this research, we utilized inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to determine the presence of 12 heavy metals in Taiwanese commercial edible oils, both refined and unrefined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Our analytical findings revealed significantly lower levels of heavy metals in refined oils compared with unrefined oils. Through principal component analysis and cluster analysis of 19 types of edible oils, we identified Cd, Ba, Fe, Pb, and Co as the primary variables influencing heavy metal levels in edible oils. Notably, the heavy metal contents in the edible oils did not surpass international standards. Risk assessment results indicated that unrefined oils carried higher risk levels than refined oils. The incremental lifetime cancer risk values calculated for unrefined oils exceeded 10<sup>−6</sup> in all age groups except for the 19 ~ 65 years category, while the noncarcinogenic risks remained well below 1, regardless of refined or unrefined oils.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our study sheds light on the distribution characteristics of heavy metal contents in edible oils, highlighting higher levels of heavy metals and associated risks in non-refined oils compared with refined oils. Ultimately, the presence of heavy metals in edible oils poses low health risks to the human body.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93795,"journal":{"name":"JSFA reports","volume":"4 3","pages":"175-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jsf2.186","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSFA reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsf2.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Minimizing the risk of heavy metal pollution is of utmost importance to ensure consumer safety. In this research, we utilized inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry to determine the presence of 12 heavy metals in Taiwanese commercial edible oils, both refined and unrefined.

Results

Our analytical findings revealed significantly lower levels of heavy metals in refined oils compared with unrefined oils. Through principal component analysis and cluster analysis of 19 types of edible oils, we identified Cd, Ba, Fe, Pb, and Co as the primary variables influencing heavy metal levels in edible oils. Notably, the heavy metal contents in the edible oils did not surpass international standards. Risk assessment results indicated that unrefined oils carried higher risk levels than refined oils. The incremental lifetime cancer risk values calculated for unrefined oils exceeded 10−6 in all age groups except for the 19 ~ 65 years category, while the noncarcinogenic risks remained well below 1, regardless of refined or unrefined oils.

Conclusions

Our study sheds light on the distribution characteristics of heavy metal contents in edible oils, highlighting higher levels of heavy metals and associated risks in non-refined oils compared with refined oils. Ultimately, the presence of heavy metals in edible oils poses low health risks to the human body.

Abstract Image

台湾各种食用油中 12 种重金属的测定、分布和健康风险评估
背景 将重金属污染的风险降至最低对确保消费者安全至关重要。在这项研究中,我们利用电感耦合等离子体质谱法测定了台湾商品食用油(包括精炼油和未精炼油)中 12 种重金属的含量。 结果 我们的分析结果显示,精炼油中的重金属含量明显低于未精炼油。通过对 19 种食用油进行主成分分析和聚类分析,我们发现镉、钡、铁、铅和钴是影响食用油中重金属含量的主要变量。值得注意的是,食用油中的重金属含量并未超过国际标准。风险评估结果表明,未精炼油的风险水平高于精炼油。除 19 至 65 岁年龄组外,所有年龄组计算出的未精炼油终生致癌风险增量值均超过 10-6,而非致癌风险仍远低于 1,无论精炼油还是未精炼油。 结论 我们的研究揭示了食用油中重金属含量的分布特点,与精炼油相比,非精炼油中的重金属含量更高,相关风险也更大。最终,食用油中的重金属对人体健康的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信