PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
George Gifford , Alexis E. Cullen , Sandra Vieira , Anja Searle , Robert A. McCutcheon , Gemma Modinos , William S. Stone , Emily Hird , Jennifer Barnett , Hendrika H. van Hell , Ana Catalan , Edward Millgate , Nick Taptiklis , Francesca Cormack , Margot E. Slot , Paola Dazzan , Arija Maat , Lieuwe de Haan , Benedicto Crespo Facorro , Birte Glenthøj , Philip McGuire
{"title":"PsyCog: A computerised mini battery for assessing cognition in psychosis","authors":"George Gifford ,&nbsp;Alexis E. Cullen ,&nbsp;Sandra Vieira ,&nbsp;Anja Searle ,&nbsp;Robert A. McCutcheon ,&nbsp;Gemma Modinos ,&nbsp;William S. Stone ,&nbsp;Emily Hird ,&nbsp;Jennifer Barnett ,&nbsp;Hendrika H. van Hell ,&nbsp;Ana Catalan ,&nbsp;Edward Millgate ,&nbsp;Nick Taptiklis ,&nbsp;Francesca Cormack ,&nbsp;Margot E. Slot ,&nbsp;Paola Dazzan ,&nbsp;Arija Maat ,&nbsp;Lieuwe de Haan ,&nbsp;Benedicto Crespo Facorro ,&nbsp;Birte Glenthøj ,&nbsp;Philip McGuire","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2024.100310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised assessments could help to address this issue. We present data from an evaluation of PsyCog, a computerised, non-verbal, mini battery of cognitive tests. Healthy Control (HC) (<em>N</em> = 135), Clinical High Risk (CHR) (<em>N</em> = 233), and First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (<em>N</em> = 301) participants from a multi-centre prospective study were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. PsyCog was used to assess cognitive performance at baseline and at up to two follow-up timepoints. Mean total testing time was 35.95 min (SD = 2.87). Relative to HCs, effect sizes of performance impairments were medium to large in FEP patients (composite score G = 1.21, subtest range = 0.52–0.88) and small to medium in CHR patients (composite score G = 0.59, subtest range = 0.18–0.49). Site effects were minimal, and test-retest reliability of the PsyCog composite was good (ICC = 0.82–0.89), though some practice effects and differences in data completion between groups were found. The present implementation of PsyCog shows it to be a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in people with psychosis. Computerised cognitive assessments have the potential to facilitate the evaluation of cognition in psychosis in both research and in clinical care, though caution should still be taken in terms of implementation and study design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100310"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000118/pdfft?md5=40d27cb9dafcbf41a42a125575e4427c&pid=1-s2.0-S2215001324000118-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001324000118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the functional impact of cognitive deficit in people with psychosis, objective cognitive assessment is not typically part of routine clinical care. This is partly due to the length of traditional assessments and the need for a highly trained administrator. Brief, automated computerised assessments could help to address this issue. We present data from an evaluation of PsyCog, a computerised, non-verbal, mini battery of cognitive tests. Healthy Control (HC) (N = 135), Clinical High Risk (CHR) (N = 233), and First Episode Psychosis (FEP) (N = 301) participants from a multi-centre prospective study were assessed at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. PsyCog was used to assess cognitive performance at baseline and at up to two follow-up timepoints. Mean total testing time was 35.95 min (SD = 2.87). Relative to HCs, effect sizes of performance impairments were medium to large in FEP patients (composite score G = 1.21, subtest range = 0.52–0.88) and small to medium in CHR patients (composite score G = 0.59, subtest range = 0.18–0.49). Site effects were minimal, and test-retest reliability of the PsyCog composite was good (ICC = 0.82–0.89), though some practice effects and differences in data completion between groups were found. The present implementation of PsyCog shows it to be a useful tool for assessing cognitive function in people with psychosis. Computerised cognitive assessments have the potential to facilitate the evaluation of cognition in psychosis in both research and in clinical care, though caution should still be taken in terms of implementation and study design.

PsyCog:用于评估精神病认知能力的计算机化小型电池
尽管认知缺陷对精神病患者的功能有影响,但客观认知评估通常并不是常规临床护理的一部分。这部分是由于传统评估耗时较长,而且需要训练有素的管理人员。简短的自动计算机化评估有助于解决这一问题。我们展示了对 PsyCog 的评估数据,这是一种计算机化、非言语、小型认知测试。我们对一项多中心前瞻性研究中的健康对照组(HC)(N = 135)、临床高风险组(CHR)(N = 233)和首发精神病组(FEP)(N = 301)参与者进行了基线、6 个月和 12 个月的评估。PsyCog 用于评估基线和两个随访时间点的认知表现。平均总测试时间为 35.95 分钟(SD = 2.87)。与普通人相比,FEP 患者的表现障碍效应大小为中等至大(综合得分 G = 1.21,子测试范围 = 0.52-0.88),CHR 患者的表现障碍效应大小为小至中等(综合得分 G = 0.59,子测试范围 = 0.18-0.49)。现场效应极小,PsyCog 综合测试的重测可靠性良好(ICC = 0.82-0.89),但也发现了一些实践效应和组间数据完成度的差异。目前的PsyCog实施情况表明,它是评估精神病患者认知功能的有用工具。计算机化认知评估有可能促进研究和临床护理中对精神病患者认知能力的评估,但在实施和研究设计方面仍需谨慎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信