Coparenting as a family-level construct: Parent and child inputs across the first two years.

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/famp.12993
Liu Bai, Ulziimaa Chimed-Ochir, Douglas M Teti
{"title":"Coparenting as a family-level construct: Parent and child inputs across the first two years.","authors":"Liu Bai, Ulziimaa Chimed-Ochir, Douglas M Teti","doi":"10.1111/famp.12993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined the effects of infant negative affectivity (NA) and maternal and paternal depressive symptoms on fathers' and mothers' perceptions of coparenting across the first 2 years following an infant's birth. A total of 147 two-parent families (most couples were White, married, and living together) with healthy, full-term infants were recruited. At each time point, fathers and mothers separately reported their coparenting perceptions via the Coparenting Relationship Scale and their depressive symptoms using the depression subscale of Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Mothers also reported their children's NA via the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised at 3 to 12 months and the Early Child Behavior Questionnaire at 18 and 24 months. Findings from growth curve models in an actor-partner interdependence model framework suggested that among parents with higher depression, there were steeper declines in coparenting quality reported by parents and their spouses across 3-24 months. In addition, three separate two-way interactions between variables including higher-than-usual parental and spousal depression, as well as higher-than-usual infant NA predicted poorer-than-usual coparenting experiences. Findings indicate that coparenting is a dynamically unfolding construct that is impacted by ongoing changes in the parents' social-ecological niche and suggest the need to consider both parent and child characteristics, and to include spousal influences, to get a comprehensive, whole-family understanding of levels and changes in coparenting relationships. The findings also confirm that coparenting dynamics may benefit from interventions engaging both couples and addressing multiple risk factors from both parents (e.g., depression) and children (e.g., NA).</p>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12993","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the effects of infant negative affectivity (NA) and maternal and paternal depressive symptoms on fathers' and mothers' perceptions of coparenting across the first 2 years following an infant's birth. A total of 147 two-parent families (most couples were White, married, and living together) with healthy, full-term infants were recruited. At each time point, fathers and mothers separately reported their coparenting perceptions via the Coparenting Relationship Scale and their depressive symptoms using the depression subscale of Symptom Checklist-90-Revised. Mothers also reported their children's NA via the Infant Behavior Questionnaire-Revised at 3 to 12 months and the Early Child Behavior Questionnaire at 18 and 24 months. Findings from growth curve models in an actor-partner interdependence model framework suggested that among parents with higher depression, there were steeper declines in coparenting quality reported by parents and their spouses across 3-24 months. In addition, three separate two-way interactions between variables including higher-than-usual parental and spousal depression, as well as higher-than-usual infant NA predicted poorer-than-usual coparenting experiences. Findings indicate that coparenting is a dynamically unfolding construct that is impacted by ongoing changes in the parents' social-ecological niche and suggest the need to consider both parent and child characteristics, and to include spousal influences, to get a comprehensive, whole-family understanding of levels and changes in coparenting relationships. The findings also confirm that coparenting dynamics may benefit from interventions engaging both couples and addressing multiple risk factors from both parents (e.g., depression) and children (e.g., NA).

共同养育作为家庭层面的建构:父母和子女在最初两年的投入。
本研究探讨了婴儿的消极情绪(NA)以及母亲和父亲的抑郁症状对父亲和母亲在婴儿出生后头两年中对共同养育的看法的影响。研究共招募了 147 个有健康足月婴儿的双亲家庭(大多数夫妇为白人、已婚并同居)。在每个时间点,父亲和母亲分别通过 "共育关系量表"(Coparenting Relationship Scale)和 "症状检查表-90-修订版"(Symptom Checklist-90-Revised)的抑郁子量表(Depression Subcale)报告他们的共育观念和抑郁症状。母亲们还通过婴儿行为问卷-修订版(3 至 12 个月)和儿童早期行为问卷(18 和 24 个月)来报告其子女的 NA 情况。演员-伙伴相互依存模型框架下的成长曲线模型的研究结果表明,在抑郁程度较高的父母中,父母及其配偶所报告的共同养育质量在 3-24 个月期间的下降幅度更大。此外,包括父母和配偶抑郁程度高于正常值以及婴儿 NA 高于正常值在内的三个独立变量之间的双向交互作用也预示着父母与子女之间的共同养育体验会比正常值差。研究结果表明,共同养育是一个动态发展的概念,会受到父母社会生态位持续变化的影响,并表明有必要同时考虑父母和子女的特征,并将配偶的影响因素包括在内,以便对共同养育关系的水平和变化有一个全面的、全家庭的了解。研究结果还证实,夫妻双方都参与的干预措施,以及针对父母(如抑郁)和子女(如 NA)的多种风险因素的干预措施,可能会使共育动态关系受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信