{"title":"Models of classroom discipline – teachers’ preferences and their selected predictors","authors":"Agnieszka Zamarian","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.4421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on teachers' preferred discipline models and selected predictors of these preferences. The research is based on the discipline theory by Charles H. Wolfgang (2001), the individual philosophy of discipline model by Clifford H. Edwards (2008) and the self-determination theory by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (2000). It was conducted using English-language tools translated into Polish: The Beliefs on Discipline Inventory (Glickman and Tamashiro, 1980), The Teachers' Need for Autonomy Satisfaction (Tadić, 2015) and the Polish-language tool, which is Education Rationality Questionnaire (Milerski and Karwowski, 2016). The study included 169 teachers employed in kindergartens, elementary and secondary schools. The analysis suggests that the confronting-contracting model of discipline is the most successful among the respondents, followed by the relationship-listening model and the rules and consequences model. Factors predicting teachers' preferences include individual educational philosophy and age.","PeriodicalId":147535,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","volume":"103 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on teachers' preferred discipline models and selected predictors of these preferences. The research is based on the discipline theory by Charles H. Wolfgang (2001), the individual philosophy of discipline model by Clifford H. Edwards (2008) and the self-determination theory by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (2000). It was conducted using English-language tools translated into Polish: The Beliefs on Discipline Inventory (Glickman and Tamashiro, 1980), The Teachers' Need for Autonomy Satisfaction (Tadić, 2015) and the Polish-language tool, which is Education Rationality Questionnaire (Milerski and Karwowski, 2016). The study included 169 teachers employed in kindergartens, elementary and secondary schools. The analysis suggests that the confronting-contracting model of discipline is the most successful among the respondents, followed by the relationship-listening model and the rules and consequences model. Factors predicting teachers' preferences include individual educational philosophy and age.
本文旨在介绍有关教师偏好的学科模式及其选定预测因素的研究成果。研究基于 Charles H. Wolfgang(2001 年)的纪律理论、Clifford H. Edwards(2008 年)的个人纪律哲学模式以及 E. L. Deci 和 R. M. Ryan(2000 年)的自我决定理论。研究使用翻译成波兰语的英语工具进行:研究使用了翻译成波兰语的英语工具:"纪律信念量表"(Glickman 和 Tamashiro,1980 年)、"教师自主需求满意度"(Tadić,2015 年)和波兰语工具 "教育理性问卷"(Milerski 和 Karwowski,2016 年)。研究对象包括 169 名受雇于幼儿园、小学和中学的教师。分析表明,在受访者中,"对抗-契约 "纪律模式最成功,其次是 "关系-倾听 "模式和 "规则-后果 "模式。影响教师偏好的因素包括个人教育理念和年龄。