Models of classroom discipline – teachers’ preferences and their selected predictors

Agnieszka Zamarian
{"title":"Models of classroom discipline – teachers’ preferences and their selected predictors","authors":"Agnieszka Zamarian","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.4421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on teachers' preferred discipline models and selected predictors of these preferences. The research is based on the discipline theory by Charles H. Wolfgang (2001), the individual philosophy of discipline model by Clifford H. Edwards (2008) and the self-determination theory by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (2000). It was conducted using English-language tools translated into Polish: The Beliefs on Discipline Inventory (Glickman and Tamashiro, 1980), The Teachers' Need for Autonomy Satisfaction (Tadić, 2015) and the Polish-language tool, which is Education Rationality Questionnaire (Milerski and Karwowski, 2016). The study included 169 teachers employed in kindergartens, elementary and secondary schools. The analysis suggests that the confronting-contracting model of discipline is the most successful among the respondents, followed by the relationship-listening model and the rules and consequences model. Factors predicting teachers' preferences include individual educational philosophy and age.","PeriodicalId":147535,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","volume":"103 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Teorii Wychowania","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.4421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present the results of research on teachers' preferred discipline models and selected predictors of these preferences. The research is based on the discipline theory by Charles H. Wolfgang (2001), the individual philosophy of discipline model by Clifford H. Edwards (2008) and the self-determination theory by E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan (2000). It was conducted using English-language tools translated into Polish: The Beliefs on Discipline Inventory (Glickman and Tamashiro, 1980), The Teachers' Need for Autonomy Satisfaction (Tadić, 2015) and the Polish-language tool, which is Education Rationality Questionnaire (Milerski and Karwowski, 2016). The study included 169 teachers employed in kindergartens, elementary and secondary schools. The analysis suggests that the confronting-contracting model of discipline is the most successful among the respondents, followed by the relationship-listening model and the rules and consequences model. Factors predicting teachers' preferences include individual educational philosophy and age.
课堂纪律模式--教师的偏好及其选定的预测因素
本文旨在介绍有关教师偏好的学科模式及其选定预测因素的研究成果。研究基于 Charles H. Wolfgang(2001 年)的纪律理论、Clifford H. Edwards(2008 年)的个人纪律哲学模式以及 E. L. Deci 和 R. M. Ryan(2000 年)的自我决定理论。研究使用翻译成波兰语的英语工具进行:研究使用了翻译成波兰语的英语工具:"纪律信念量表"(Glickman 和 Tamashiro,1980 年)、"教师自主需求满意度"(Tadić,2015 年)和波兰语工具 "教育理性问卷"(Milerski 和 Karwowski,2016 年)。研究对象包括 169 名受雇于幼儿园、小学和中学的教师。分析表明,在受访者中,"对抗-契约 "纪律模式最成功,其次是 "关系-倾听 "模式和 "规则-后果 "模式。影响教师偏好的因素包括个人教育理念和年龄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信