Integrating supply chain risk management activities into sales and operations planning

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Christian Kalla, Luiz Felipe Scavarda, Bernd Hellingrath
{"title":"Integrating supply chain risk management activities into sales and operations planning","authors":"Christian Kalla, Luiz Felipe Scavarda, Bernd Hellingrath","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00756-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> Sales and operations planning (S&amp;OP) became a relevant managerial topic for academics and practitioners with a growing literature body and implementation cases in the industry. However, S&amp;OP has been analysed mostly in stable environments, with few implications for uncertain environments. With the current growing pressure to deal with unexpected changes in the business environment, the integration with supply chain risk management (SCRM) activities has been considered a promising direction for the next S&amp;OP generation. Within this context, this paper aims to advance the theoretical understanding of the interrelationship between S&amp;OP and SCRM under different contexts and provide a practical guidance for adapting S&amp;OP in uncertain environments. This goal is achieved by combining literature-based insights, obtained through a rigorous systematic literature review of 77 studies from academic and grey literature, with empirical insights from interviews with 15 industry experts. The research leads to a novel S&amp;OP framework for dealing with uncertain environments. It integrates SCRM activities into S&amp;OP, applying contingency theory as a theoretical foundation to address the context-specific nature of S&amp;OP. Moreover, it embraces a holistic view for S&amp;OP from an integrated people-process-IT perspective, encompassing the involved actors, the process itself and its steps, and the adopted information systems. Additionally, research findings reveal the possibility for an additional process to cope better with uncertain environments, which can run in parallel with the regular S&amp;OP process. It is characterised by a higher planning frequency and a lower planning horizon, resulting in a closer linkage with operational planning and execution.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00756-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sales and operations planning (S&OP) became a relevant managerial topic for academics and practitioners with a growing literature body and implementation cases in the industry. However, S&OP has been analysed mostly in stable environments, with few implications for uncertain environments. With the current growing pressure to deal with unexpected changes in the business environment, the integration with supply chain risk management (SCRM) activities has been considered a promising direction for the next S&OP generation. Within this context, this paper aims to advance the theoretical understanding of the interrelationship between S&OP and SCRM under different contexts and provide a practical guidance for adapting S&OP in uncertain environments. This goal is achieved by combining literature-based insights, obtained through a rigorous systematic literature review of 77 studies from academic and grey literature, with empirical insights from interviews with 15 industry experts. The research leads to a novel S&OP framework for dealing with uncertain environments. It integrates SCRM activities into S&OP, applying contingency theory as a theoretical foundation to address the context-specific nature of S&OP. Moreover, it embraces a holistic view for S&OP from an integrated people-process-IT perspective, encompassing the involved actors, the process itself and its steps, and the adopted information systems. Additionally, research findings reveal the possibility for an additional process to cope better with uncertain environments, which can run in parallel with the regular S&OP process. It is characterised by a higher planning frequency and a lower planning horizon, resulting in a closer linkage with operational planning and execution.

Abstract Image

将供应链风险管理活动纳入销售和运营规划
销售与运营规划(S&OP)已成为学术界和从业人员关注的管理课题,相关文献和行业实施案例不断增加。然而,S&OP 主要是在稳定环境下进行分析,对不确定环境的影响很少。随着当前应对商业环境中意外变化的压力越来越大,与供应链风险管理(SCRM)活动的整合被认为是下一代 S&OP 的一个有前途的方向。在此背景下,本文旨在推进对不同背景下 S&OP 与 SCRM 之间相互关系的理论理解,并为在不确定环境中调整 S&OP 提供实践指导。为实现这一目标,我们对学术和灰色文献中的 77 项研究进行了严格的系统性文献综述,并对 15 位行业专家进行了访谈。这项研究提出了一个新颖的 S&OP 框架,用于应对不确定的环境。它将 SCRM 活动纳入 S&OP,并将权变理论作为理论基础,以解决 S&OP 的特定环境性质。此外,它还从人员-流程-IT 一体化的角度对 S&OP 采用了整体观点,包括参与人员、流程本身及其步骤,以及所采用的信息系统。此外,研究结果还揭示了一种额外流程的可能性,以更好地应对不确定的环境,这种流程可以与常规的 S&OP 流程并行。其特点是规划频率更高,规划范围更小,从而与业务规划和执行的联系更加紧密。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信