Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy at Different Voltages on Dorsal Root Ganglia Using Multifunctional Catheter to Treat Low Back Pain: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pain physician Pub Date : 2024-03-01
Dolores Rufolo, Carmelo Attilio Costa, Giulia Bravo, Paola Nosella
{"title":"Pulsed Radiofrequency Therapy at Different Voltages on Dorsal Root Ganglia Using Multifunctional Catheter to Treat Low Back Pain: A Comparative Retrospective Study.","authors":"Dolores Rufolo, Carmelo Attilio Costa, Giulia Bravo, Paola Nosella","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Applying pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is an electrical neuromodulation technique, a valid complementary therapeutic treatment for failed back surgery syndrome (FBBS). Peridurolysis, when applied to vertebral canal adhesions, can be performed with dedicated catheters, providing patients with the benefits of mechanical, electrical, and pharmacological techniques.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate PRF's effects on the DRG as part of FBSS treatment at different follow-up times, comparing 2 groups of patients exposed to distinct levels of voltage (100 V vs. 45 V) from a PRF generator.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective observational study was performed.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted on a sample of patients from an Italian hospital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PRF's effects on the DRG as part of FBSS treatment were evaluated through the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the monitoring of 155 patients' opioid consumption at 3, 6, and 9 months. A Cosman® G4 model PRF generator was used. During follow-up periods, the Friedman test was applied to detect differences in outcomes between the 2 groups of patients, who were treated with different levels of voltage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most frequent diagnosis (61.29%) was FBBS in patients at a mean age of 64 (± 11.8) years old. All patients were treated with PRF on the dorsal ganglion, with the addition of a drug mixture. Most were treated with 100 V (62%). A statistically significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the NRS score emerged both as a whole and in the 2 distinct groups. Moreover, the group of 100 V patients showed a significant (P = 0.0360) reduction in the use of opioids.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>This observational retrospective study was based on a convenience sampling that involved a limited number of patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-field technology is the only way to generate a constant 38°/42° PRF and 100 V level throughout surgical interventions (respecting the exposure times \"set\" by the operator). The patient will not feel any pain or electric current because the generated milliamperes will be greatly reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":19841,"journal":{"name":"Pain physician","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain physician","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Applying pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) to the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is an electrical neuromodulation technique, a valid complementary therapeutic treatment for failed back surgery syndrome (FBBS). Peridurolysis, when applied to vertebral canal adhesions, can be performed with dedicated catheters, providing patients with the benefits of mechanical, electrical, and pharmacological techniques.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate PRF's effects on the DRG as part of FBSS treatment at different follow-up times, comparing 2 groups of patients exposed to distinct levels of voltage (100 V vs. 45 V) from a PRF generator.

Study design: A retrospective observational study was performed.

Setting: The study was conducted on a sample of patients from an Italian hospital.

Methods: PRF's effects on the DRG as part of FBSS treatment were evaluated through the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) and the monitoring of 155 patients' opioid consumption at 3, 6, and 9 months. A Cosman® G4 model PRF generator was used. During follow-up periods, the Friedman test was applied to detect differences in outcomes between the 2 groups of patients, who were treated with different levels of voltage.

Results: The most frequent diagnosis (61.29%) was FBBS in patients at a mean age of 64 (± 11.8) years old. All patients were treated with PRF on the dorsal ganglion, with the addition of a drug mixture. Most were treated with 100 V (62%). A statistically significant decrease (P < 0.001) in the NRS score emerged both as a whole and in the 2 distinct groups. Moreover, the group of 100 V patients showed a significant (P = 0.0360) reduction in the use of opioids.

Limitations: This observational retrospective study was based on a convenience sampling that involved a limited number of patients.

Conclusions: E-field technology is the only way to generate a constant 38°/42° PRF and 100 V level throughout surgical interventions (respecting the exposure times "set" by the operator). The patient will not feel any pain or electric current because the generated milliamperes will be greatly reduced.

使用多功能导管以不同电压对背根神经节进行脉冲射频治疗以治疗腰痛:一项回顾性比较研究。
背景:将脉冲射频(PRF)应用于背根神经节(DRG)是一种电神经调节技术,是治疗背部手术失败综合征(FBBS)的有效辅助疗法。用于椎管粘连的周神经电解术可通过专用导管进行,为患者提供机械、电和药物技术的益处:本研究旨在评估 PRF 作为 FBSS 治疗的一部分在不同随访时间对 DRG 的影响,比较两组暴露于 PRF 发生器不同电压水平(100 V 与 45 V)的患者:研究设计:这是一项回顾性观察研究:研究对象:意大利一家医院的抽样患者:作为 FBSS 治疗的一部分,PRF 对 DRG 的影响通过数字评定量表 (NRS) 和对 155 名患者 3、6 和 9 个月阿片类药物消耗量的监测进行评估。使用的是 Cosman® G4 型 PRF 发生器。在随访期间,采用弗里德曼检验法检测两组患者在不同电压水平下治疗结果的差异:最常见的诊断(61.29%)是 FBBS,患者平均年龄为 64(± 11.8)岁。所有患者都接受了背神经节 PRF 治疗,并加入了混合药物。大多数患者接受了 100 V 的治疗(62%)。无论从整体还是从两个不同的组别来看,NRS 评分都出现了统计学意义上的明显下降(P < 0.001)。此外,100 V 组患者的阿片类药物用量明显减少(P = 0.0360):局限性:这一观察性回顾研究基于方便抽样,涉及的患者人数有限:电子场技术是在整个手术干预过程中产生恒定的 38°/42° PRF 和 100 V 电压水平的唯一方法(遵守操作者 "设定 "的曝光时间)。病人不会感觉到任何疼痛或电流,因为产生的毫安培电流将大大减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain physician
Pain physician CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
21.60%
发文量
234
期刊介绍: Pain Physician Journal is the official publication of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP). The open access journal is published 6 times a year. Pain Physician Journal is a peer-reviewed, multi-disciplinary, open access journal written by and directed to an audience of interventional pain physicians, clinicians and basic scientists with an interest in interventional pain management and pain medicine. Pain Physician Journal presents the latest studies, research, and information vital to those in the emerging specialty of interventional pain management – and critical to the people they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信