Evaluating Critical Thinking Disposition, Emotional Intelligence, and Learning Environment of Nursing Students: A Longitudinal Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-17 DOI:10.1177/01939459241238687
Antonios Christodoulakis, George Kritsotakis, Manolis Linardakis, Panayota Sourtzi, Ioanna Tsiligianni
{"title":"Evaluating Critical Thinking Disposition, Emotional Intelligence, and Learning Environment of Nursing Students: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Antonios Christodoulakis, George Kritsotakis, Manolis Linardakis, Panayota Sourtzi, Ioanna Tsiligianni","doi":"10.1177/01939459241238687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic may have inhibited the development of critical thinking and emotional intelligence of nursing students due to the transition from traditional to online learning environments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective was to evaluate the development of critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and the perceived learning environment of nursing students during the pandemic from their first to second year.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a longitudinal study of 82 nursing students from 2 universities in Greece. We measured critical thinking disposition, emotional intelligence, and the students' perceptions of the learning environment in 2 phases, separated by a 10 month interval, before and during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students had moderate-to-high critical thinking and emotional intelligence and perceived the learning environment as more positive than negative in both phases. However, there were no statistically significant changes between phases in critical thinking disposition (mean score 44.3 vs 45.1, <i>p</i> = .224) and emotional intelligence (mean score 5.05 vs 5.06, <i>p</i> = .950) between the 2 phases. Nevertheless, students rated the online learning environment (phase 2) higher than the traditional (mean score 137.8 vs 132.2, <i>p</i> = .005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Critical thinking and emotional intelligence did not change, but students favored the online learning environment over the traditional. These findings suggest that nurse educators persevered, adapted, and maintained the quality of the learning environment despite the pandemic. Moreover, the utilization of an online learning environment may have led to enhanced enjoyment and engagement for students, which could potentially result in improved learning outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"381-388"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241238687","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic may have inhibited the development of critical thinking and emotional intelligence of nursing students due to the transition from traditional to online learning environments.

Objective: The objective was to evaluate the development of critical thinking, emotional intelligence, and the perceived learning environment of nursing students during the pandemic from their first to second year.

Methods: This was a longitudinal study of 82 nursing students from 2 universities in Greece. We measured critical thinking disposition, emotional intelligence, and the students' perceptions of the learning environment in 2 phases, separated by a 10 month interval, before and during the pandemic.

Results: Students had moderate-to-high critical thinking and emotional intelligence and perceived the learning environment as more positive than negative in both phases. However, there were no statistically significant changes between phases in critical thinking disposition (mean score 44.3 vs 45.1, p = .224) and emotional intelligence (mean score 5.05 vs 5.06, p = .950) between the 2 phases. Nevertheless, students rated the online learning environment (phase 2) higher than the traditional (mean score 137.8 vs 132.2, p = .005).

Conclusions: Critical thinking and emotional intelligence did not change, but students favored the online learning environment over the traditional. These findings suggest that nurse educators persevered, adapted, and maintained the quality of the learning environment despite the pandemic. Moreover, the utilization of an online learning environment may have led to enhanced enjoyment and engagement for students, which could potentially result in improved learning outcomes.

评价护理专业学生的批判性思维处置、情商和学习环境:纵向研究
背景:由于从传统学习环境过渡到在线学习环境,COVID-19大流行可能会抑制护理专业学生批判性思维和情商的发展:目的:评估护理专业学生在大流行期间从一年级到二年级的批判性思维、情商和感知学习环境的发展情况:这是一项针对希腊两所大学 82 名护理专业学生的纵向研究。我们在大流行前和大流行期间分两个阶段测量了学生的批判性思维倾向、情商和对学习环境的感知,这两个阶段之间相隔 10 个月:结果:在这两个阶段,学生的批判性思维和情绪智力都处于中等偏上水平,对学习环境的看法也是积极的多于消极的。然而,在两个阶段之间,批判性思维倾向(平均分 44.3 vs 45.1,p = .224)和情绪智力(平均分 5.05 vs 5.06,p = .950)在统计学上没有显著变化。然而,学生对在线学习环境(第 2 阶段)的评价高于传统学习环境(平均分 137.8 vs 132.2,p = .005):结论:批判性思维和情商没有变化,但学生更喜欢在线学习环境,而不是传统学习环境。这些发现表明,尽管发生了大流行病,但护士教育者仍坚持不懈地调整并保持了学习环境的质量。此外,在线学习环境的使用可能提高了学生的乐趣和参与度,从而有可能改善学习效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信