Early Mobilization Decision after an Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Catarina Fernandes, João André Sousa, Sara Bernardo-Castro, Fernando Silva, Helena Donato, João Sargento-Freitas
{"title":"Early Mobilization Decision after an Acute Ischemic Stroke: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.","authors":"Catarina Fernandes, João André Sousa, Sara Bernardo-Castro, Fernando Silva, Helena Donato, João Sargento-Freitas","doi":"10.20344/amp.20715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke is considered one of the greatest public health challenges worldwide, with the ischemic subtype being the most prevalent. Various acute stroke clinical guidelines recommend early rehabilitation interventions, including very early mobilization. However, despite the studies conducted in recent years regarding when to initiate mobilization after an acute stroke, there are few systematic and personalized protocols based on the factors for which patient mobilization should ideally be performed. We aim to conduct an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to study the early mobilization decision after an acute ischemic stroke in comparison with conventional care and correlate the different approaches with patient clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>We will perform a systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Retrieved studies will be independently reviewed by two authors and any discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Reviewers will extract the data and assess the risk of bias in the selected studies. We will use the 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist as the critical appraisal tool to assess cumulative evidence and risk of bias of the different studies. This will be the first umbrella review that compares early mobilization approaches in post-acute ischemic stroke. This study may help to define the optimal early mobilization strategy in stroke patients. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023430494.</p>","PeriodicalId":7059,"journal":{"name":"Acta medica portuguesa","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta medica portuguesa","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20344/amp.20715","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke is considered one of the greatest public health challenges worldwide, with the ischemic subtype being the most prevalent. Various acute stroke clinical guidelines recommend early rehabilitation interventions, including very early mobilization. However, despite the studies conducted in recent years regarding when to initiate mobilization after an acute stroke, there are few systematic and personalized protocols based on the factors for which patient mobilization should ideally be performed. We aim to conduct an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to study the early mobilization decision after an acute ischemic stroke in comparison with conventional care and correlate the different approaches with patient clinical outcomes.

Methods and analysis: We will perform a systematic search on PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Epistemonikos and Web of Science Core Collection databases. Retrieved studies will be independently reviewed by two authors and any discrepancies will be resolved by consensus or with a third reviewer. Reviewers will extract the data and assess the risk of bias in the selected studies. We will use the 16-item Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR2) checklist as the critical appraisal tool to assess cumulative evidence and risk of bias of the different studies. This will be the first umbrella review that compares early mobilization approaches in post-acute ischemic stroke. This study may help to define the optimal early mobilization strategy in stroke patients. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42023430494.

急性缺血性脑卒中后的早期动员决策:总括审查协议》。
引言脑卒中被认为是全球最大的公共卫生挑战之一,其中缺血性亚型脑卒中最为普遍。各种急性脑卒中临床指南都建议进行早期康复干预,包括早期动员。然而,尽管近年来对急性脑卒中后何时开始动员进行了研究,但很少有系统的、个性化的方案是根据哪些因素理想地对患者进行动员。我们旨在通过系统综述和荟萃分析,研究急性缺血性脑卒中后的早期动员决策与常规护理的比较,并将不同方法与患者的临床结果联系起来:我们将在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统综述数据库、Epistemonikos 和 Web of Science Core Collection 数据库中进行系统检索。检索到的研究将由两位作者独立审阅,如有任何分歧,将通过协商一致或与第三位审阅者共同解决。审稿人将提取数据并评估所选研究的偏倚风险。我们将使用 16 个项目的《多重系统性综述评估 2》(AMSTAR2)核对表作为批判性评估工具,以评估不同研究的累积证据和偏倚风险。这将是首次对急性缺血性脑卒中后早期康复方法进行比较的综述。这项研究可能有助于确定脑卒中患者的最佳早期康复策略。PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42023430494。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta medica portuguesa
Acta medica portuguesa MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Acta Médica Portuguesa is to publish original research and review articles in biomedical areas of the highest standard, covering several domains of medical knowledge, with the purpose to help doctors improve medical care. In order to accomplish these aims, Acta Médica Portuguesa publishes original articles, review articles, case reports and editorials, among others, with a focus on clinical, scientific, social, political and economic factors affecting health. Acta Médica Portuguesa will be happy to consider manuscripts for publication from authors anywhere in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信