Assessing the inhibitory effect and intervention mechanism of food traceability system on reducing hog farmers’ overuse of animal antibiotics in China

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Ruishi Si , Xin Liu , Sitong Pan , Qian Lu , Mingyue Liu
{"title":"Assessing the inhibitory effect and intervention mechanism of food traceability system on reducing hog farmers’ overuse of animal antibiotics in China","authors":"Ruishi Si ,&nbsp;Xin Liu ,&nbsp;Sitong Pan ,&nbsp;Qian Lu ,&nbsp;Mingyue Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of animal antibiotics is a double-edged sword. It can be used for disease treatment, health protection, and growth promoters. It also creates antibiotic residues and resistance, poses risks, and damages food safety, ecosystems, and public health. Under the pressure of disease risk and expected losses, farmers' overuse of animal antibiotics exacerbates this dual objective incompatibility. In this study, we employ the endogenous switching regression (ESR) model and the mediating effect method to empirically analyze the inhibitory effect and intervention mechanism of the food traceability system (FTS) on reducing farmers’ overuse of antibiotics by using the survey data of hog farmers from China. This paper measures the “dose” unit of antibiotics farmers use regarding cost and the active ingredients of antibiotics per kilogram of treated infected hogs. The study finds evidence that the FTS exerts a significant inhibitory effect on the overuse of antibiotics by farmers. The counterfactual hypothesis unveils that non-participation in the FTS by the involved farmers will increase the cost of antibiotics overuse by 0.080 yuan/kg, while if the farmers currently not participating are to engage with the FTS, the price will decrease by 0.126 yuan/kg. This effect persists across control variables controlled in turn and the unit doses of active ingredients of tetracycline, sulfonamides, <span><math><mi>β</mi></math></span>-lactam, chloramphenicol, and macrolide antibiotics. Moreover, our results reveal that<!--> <!-->the inhibitory effects of the FTS on over-the-counter and broad-spectrum antibiotics are more significant than on prescription and narrow-spectrum antibiotics. The results show that the inhibition effect of the FTS on the overuse of antibiotics by free-range, professional, and large-scale farmers exhibits an approximately inverse-U curvilinear relationship. Besides, the intervention mechanism of the FTS on the overuse of antibiotics by farmers mainly consists of social reputation maintenance, liability traceability for antibiotic residues, and biosafety enhancement, and the proportion of their mediating effects in the total impact are 24.22%, 21.84%, and 10.87%, respectively. Our empirical study has yielded several implications, such as strengthening the FTS construction, improving farmers’ antibiotic use skills, promoting standardized breeding levels, and increasing the market premium for food products that adhere to antibiotic residue standards. These outcomes not only contribute to the improvement of livestock production safety but also reduce the problem of antibiotic overuse.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"124 ","pages":"Article 102619"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000307","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of animal antibiotics is a double-edged sword. It can be used for disease treatment, health protection, and growth promoters. It also creates antibiotic residues and resistance, poses risks, and damages food safety, ecosystems, and public health. Under the pressure of disease risk and expected losses, farmers' overuse of animal antibiotics exacerbates this dual objective incompatibility. In this study, we employ the endogenous switching regression (ESR) model and the mediating effect method to empirically analyze the inhibitory effect and intervention mechanism of the food traceability system (FTS) on reducing farmers’ overuse of antibiotics by using the survey data of hog farmers from China. This paper measures the “dose” unit of antibiotics farmers use regarding cost and the active ingredients of antibiotics per kilogram of treated infected hogs. The study finds evidence that the FTS exerts a significant inhibitory effect on the overuse of antibiotics by farmers. The counterfactual hypothesis unveils that non-participation in the FTS by the involved farmers will increase the cost of antibiotics overuse by 0.080 yuan/kg, while if the farmers currently not participating are to engage with the FTS, the price will decrease by 0.126 yuan/kg. This effect persists across control variables controlled in turn and the unit doses of active ingredients of tetracycline, sulfonamides, β-lactam, chloramphenicol, and macrolide antibiotics. Moreover, our results reveal that the inhibitory effects of the FTS on over-the-counter and broad-spectrum antibiotics are more significant than on prescription and narrow-spectrum antibiotics. The results show that the inhibition effect of the FTS on the overuse of antibiotics by free-range, professional, and large-scale farmers exhibits an approximately inverse-U curvilinear relationship. Besides, the intervention mechanism of the FTS on the overuse of antibiotics by farmers mainly consists of social reputation maintenance, liability traceability for antibiotic residues, and biosafety enhancement, and the proportion of their mediating effects in the total impact are 24.22%, 21.84%, and 10.87%, respectively. Our empirical study has yielded several implications, such as strengthening the FTS construction, improving farmers’ antibiotic use skills, promoting standardized breeding levels, and increasing the market premium for food products that adhere to antibiotic residue standards. These outcomes not only contribute to the improvement of livestock production safety but also reduce the problem of antibiotic overuse.

评估食品可追溯体系对减少中国生猪养殖户过度使用动物抗生素的抑制作用和干预机制
动物抗生素的使用是一把双刃剑。它可用于治疗疾病、保护健康和促进生长。同时,它也会产生抗生素残留和抗药性,带来风险,损害食品安全、生态系统和公众健康。在疾病风险和预期损失的压力下,农民过度使用动物抗生素加剧了这种双重目标的不兼容性。在本研究中,我们运用内生转换回归(ESR)模型和中介效应方法,通过对中国生猪养殖户的调查数据,实证分析了食品溯源系统(FTS)对减少养殖户过度使用抗生素的抑制作用和干预机制。本文测量了养殖户使用抗生素的 "剂量 "单位,即每公斤处理感染生猪的成本和抗生素的有效成分。研究发现的证据表明,FTS 对养殖户过度使用抗生素有显著的抑制作用。反事实假设揭示,参与农户不参与 FTS 将使过度使用抗生素的成本增加 0.080 元/公斤,而如果目前未参与的农户参与 FTS,价格将下降 0.126 元/公斤。在依次控制四环素类、磺胺类、β-内酰胺类、氯霉素类和大环内酯类抗生素有效成分的单位剂量等控制变量的情况下,这一效应依然存在。此外,我们的研究结果表明,FTS 对非处方药和广谱抗生素的抑制作用比对处方药和窄谱抗生素的抑制作用更显著。结果表明,FTS 对散养农户、专业农户和规模化农户过度使用抗生素的抑制作用呈现近似于反 U 型的曲线关系。此外,FTS 对农户过度使用抗生素的干预机制主要包括社会声誉维护、抗生素残留责任追溯和生物安全提升,其中介效应占总影响的比例分别为 24.22%、21.84% 和 10.87%。我们的实证研究产生了若干影响,如加强FTS建设、提高农民抗生素使用技能、促进标准化养殖水平、提高符合抗生素残留标准的食品的市场溢价等。这些成果不仅有助于提高畜牧业生产的安全性,还能减少抗生素过度使用的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信