An Evidence-Based Approach to Constructing Multiple-Choice Test Questions for Knowledge Assessment.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Stephen D Schneid, Hirsh Makhija, Jess Mandel, Amy Kalinowski, Judy E Davidson
{"title":"An Evidence-Based Approach to Constructing Multiple-Choice Test Questions for Knowledge Assessment.","authors":"Stephen D Schneid, Hirsh Makhija, Jess Mandel, Amy Kalinowski, Judy E Davidson","doi":"10.3928/00220124-20240301-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article provides nursing educators practical tips and evidence-based strategies for effective construction of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Well-designed MCQs that align with the intended learning objectives are critical for implementing sound assessment practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This article offers a step-by-step approach to test construction, starting with the assessment blueprint and followed by important considerations when writing the specific components of the MCQ.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Appropriate inclusion of clinical context in the MCQ and a description of common flaws to avoid, with suggested remedies, are also addressed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ultimately, the goal of this article is to equip nurse educators with the foundational tools to create high-quality MCQs that effectively assess knowledge acquisition by learners. <b>[<i>J Contin Educ Nurs.</i> 2024;55(6):289-296.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":49295,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"289-296"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20240301-06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article provides nursing educators practical tips and evidence-based strategies for effective construction of multiple-choice questions (MCQs). Well-designed MCQs that align with the intended learning objectives are critical for implementing sound assessment practices.

Method: This article offers a step-by-step approach to test construction, starting with the assessment blueprint and followed by important considerations when writing the specific components of the MCQ.

Results: Appropriate inclusion of clinical context in the MCQ and a description of common flaws to avoid, with suggested remedies, are also addressed.

Conclusion: Ultimately, the goal of this article is to equip nurse educators with the foundational tools to create high-quality MCQs that effectively assess knowledge acquisition by learners. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(6):289-296.].

以证据为基础的知识评估多选试题构建方法。
背景:本文为护理教育者提供了有效构建多项选择题(MCQs)的实用技巧和循证策略。符合预期学习目标的精心设计的 MCQ 对于实施合理的评估实践至关重要:本文提供了一种逐步构建测试的方法,首先是评估蓝图,然后是编写 MCQ 具体内容时的重要注意事项:结果:还讨论了在 MCQ 中适当加入临床背景的问题,并介绍了应避免的常见缺陷以及建议的补救措施:本文的最终目的是为护士教育者提供基础工具,帮助他们编写高质量的 MCQ,有效评估学习者的知识掌握情况。[J Contin Educ Nurs.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing is a monthly peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles on continuing nursing education that are directed toward continuing education and staff development professionals, nurse administrators, and nurse educators in all health care settings, for over 50 years.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信