The motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination as antecedents of cultural identity styles.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 ETHNIC STUDIES
Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI:10.1037/cdp0000648
Colleen Ward, Ágnes Szabó, Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong
{"title":"The motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination as antecedents of cultural identity styles.","authors":"Colleen Ward, Ágnes Szabó, Caroline Ng Tseung-Wong","doi":"10.1037/cdp0000648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The research examined the motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination as antecedents of cultural identity styles, the cognitive and behavioral strategies that bicultural individuals use for decision making in managing and maintaining their ethnic and national identities. Two major cultural identity styles have been distinguished: the alternating identity style (AIS, changing cultural identities depending on the circumstances) and the hybrid identity style (HIS, blending selected aspects of these identities in a unique way). Based on earlier cross-sectional research, we tested the hypotheses that the motivation to integrate would predict greater use of both styles and that perceived discrimination would predict greater use of the AIS, but not the HIS, over time.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A community sample of 493 Chinese Americans (56% female, 51.5% first generation, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 53.27 years) completed an online survey at two points in time with approximately a 1-month interval. Path modeling controlling for demographic factors (age, generation) and cultural identity style (AIS and HIS at T1) was used to test our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses revealed that younger Chinese Americans made greater use of the AIS and that both the motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination were significant predictors of the AIS at T2. In contrast, only the motivation to integrate predicted the HIS at T2, confirming our hypotheses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results demonstrate that both personal and situational factors affect the management of cultural identities. The findings are discussed in relation to research on acculturation and integration and theories of social and situated identity identities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48151,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"393-401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cdp0000648","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The research examined the motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination as antecedents of cultural identity styles, the cognitive and behavioral strategies that bicultural individuals use for decision making in managing and maintaining their ethnic and national identities. Two major cultural identity styles have been distinguished: the alternating identity style (AIS, changing cultural identities depending on the circumstances) and the hybrid identity style (HIS, blending selected aspects of these identities in a unique way). Based on earlier cross-sectional research, we tested the hypotheses that the motivation to integrate would predict greater use of both styles and that perceived discrimination would predict greater use of the AIS, but not the HIS, over time.

Method: A community sample of 493 Chinese Americans (56% female, 51.5% first generation, Mage = 53.27 years) completed an online survey at two points in time with approximately a 1-month interval. Path modeling controlling for demographic factors (age, generation) and cultural identity style (AIS and HIS at T1) was used to test our hypotheses.

Results: Analyses revealed that younger Chinese Americans made greater use of the AIS and that both the motivation to integrate and perceived discrimination were significant predictors of the AIS at T2. In contrast, only the motivation to integrate predicted the HIS at T2, confirming our hypotheses.

Conclusions: The results demonstrate that both personal and situational factors affect the management of cultural identities. The findings are discussed in relation to research on acculturation and integration and theories of social and situated identity identities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

作为文化认同风格前因的融入动机和感知到的歧视。
研究目的研究考察了作为文化认同风格前因的融合动机和感知到的歧视,即双文化个体在管理和维护其种族和民族认同时用于决策的认知和行为策略。研究发现了两种主要的文化认同风格:交替认同风格(AIS,根据情况改变文化认同)和混合认同风格(HIS,以独特的方式融合这些认同的某些方面)。根据早前的横断面研究,我们检验了以下假设:融入的动机将预测两种身份风格的更大使用率;感知到的歧视将预测随着时间的推移AIS的更大使用率,而不是HIS:方法:493 名美籍华人(56% 为女性,51.5% 为第一代,年龄 = 53.27 岁)在两个时间点完成了一项在线调查,调查时间间隔约为 1 个月。我们采用了控制人口统计因素(年龄、世代)和文化认同风格(T1时的AIS和HIS)的路径模型来检验我们的假设:分析表明,年轻的美籍华人更多地使用了 AIS,而且融入动机和感知到的歧视都是 AIS 在 T2 阶段的重要预测因素。相比之下,只有融入动机能预测第二阶段的 HIS,这证实了我们的假设:研究结果表明,个人因素和情境因素都会影响文化身份的管理。我们将结合文化适应和融合研究以及社会和情景身份认同理论对研究结果进行讨论。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology seeks to publish theoretical, conceptual, research, and case study articles that promote the development of knowledge and understanding, application of psychological principles, and scholarly analysis of social–political forces affecting racial and ethnic minorities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信