Exploring Students’ Conceptions of Project-Based Learning: Implications for Improving Engineering Pedagogy

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Mahbub Hasan;Jason M. Lodge;Azharul Karim;Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan
{"title":"Exploring Students’ Conceptions of Project-Based Learning: Implications for Improving Engineering Pedagogy","authors":"Mahbub Hasan;Jason M. Lodge;Azharul Karim;Md. Shahadat Hossain Khan","doi":"10.1109/TE.2023.3348523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contributions: This article provides valuable insights into the varying approaches of engineering students in their understanding and application of project-based learning (PBL) and its relationship with student success. The findings can be used to improve the design and implementation of effective learning environments, evaluate the effectiveness of engineering education programs, and advance the current understanding of the relationship between PBL and knowledge acquisition in engineering. Background: Previous research has demonstrated that PBL has become a significant teaching and learning method in engineering education. It has resulted in considerable progress in students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills, teamwork, and technical concept communication. However, there is still a lack of exploration on how engineering students perceive PBL from their standpoint and how their conceptions influence student learning. This study aims to contribute to the currently limited comprehension of PBL from the students’ perspective. Research Questions: What are the qualitatively different ways engineering students conceptualize PBL, and how does PBL contribute to knowledge and skill acquisition? Methodology: A phenomenographic approach was used to gather data from engineering students who had experienced PBL in their course. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather rich and detailed data about the students’ conceptions of PBL. The data was then analyzed using a phenomenographic framework to identify how engineering students conceived PBL. Findings: Students’ conceptions of PBL are not uniform but vary in five different pedagogical beliefs that shape how they act in the PBL environment. The different conceptions of PBL in engineering education suggest that instructors need to communicate the learning objectives of PBL more clearly to students, and design PBL activities that cater to the diverse needs and expectations of students.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10414419/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Contributions: This article provides valuable insights into the varying approaches of engineering students in their understanding and application of project-based learning (PBL) and its relationship with student success. The findings can be used to improve the design and implementation of effective learning environments, evaluate the effectiveness of engineering education programs, and advance the current understanding of the relationship between PBL and knowledge acquisition in engineering. Background: Previous research has demonstrated that PBL has become a significant teaching and learning method in engineering education. It has resulted in considerable progress in students’ problem-solving and critical thinking skills, teamwork, and technical concept communication. However, there is still a lack of exploration on how engineering students perceive PBL from their standpoint and how their conceptions influence student learning. This study aims to contribute to the currently limited comprehension of PBL from the students’ perspective. Research Questions: What are the qualitatively different ways engineering students conceptualize PBL, and how does PBL contribute to knowledge and skill acquisition? Methodology: A phenomenographic approach was used to gather data from engineering students who had experienced PBL in their course. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to gather rich and detailed data about the students’ conceptions of PBL. The data was then analyzed using a phenomenographic framework to identify how engineering students conceived PBL. Findings: Students’ conceptions of PBL are not uniform but vary in five different pedagogical beliefs that shape how they act in the PBL environment. The different conceptions of PBL in engineering education suggest that instructors need to communicate the learning objectives of PBL more clearly to students, and design PBL activities that cater to the diverse needs and expectations of students.
探索学生对基于项目的学习的看法:改进工程教学法的意义
贡献:本文就工科学生理解和应用基于项目的学习(PBL)的不同方法及其与学生成功的关系提供了有价值的见解。研究结果可用于改进有效学习环境的设计和实施,评估工程教育项目的有效性,并推进当前对 PBL 与工程知识获取之间关系的理解。背景:以往的研究表明,PBL 已成为工程教育中一种重要的教学方法。它使学生在解决问题和批判性思维能力、团队合作和技术概念交流方面取得了长足进步。然而,关于工科学生如何从他们的角度看待 PBL 以及他们的观念如何影响学生的学 习,仍然缺乏探索。本研究旨在从学生的视角出发,为目前对 PBL 的有限理解做出贡献。研究问题:工科学生对 PBL 有哪些不同的定性概念,PBL 如何促进知识和技能的掌握?研究方法:采用现象学方法从在课程中体验过 PBL 的工科学生那里收集数据。我们进行了半结构式访谈,以收集有关学生对 PBL 概念的丰富而详细的数据。然后使用现象学框架对数据进行分析,以确定工科学生是如何构想 PBL 的。研究结果学生对 PBL 的概念并非千篇一律,而是有五种不同的教学信念,这些信念决定了他们在 PBL 环境中的行为方式。工程学教育中对 PBL 的不同概念表明,教师需要更明确地向学生传达 PBL 的学习目标,并设计 PBL 活动以满足学生的不同需求和期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信