Communication Patterns and Characteristics of Family Caregivers and Persons Living With Dementia: Secondary Analysis of Video Observation.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-24 DOI:10.1177/01939459241233360
Sohyun Kim, Wen Liu, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Kristine N Williams
{"title":"Communication Patterns and Characteristics of Family Caregivers and Persons Living With Dementia: Secondary Analysis of Video Observation.","authors":"Sohyun Kim, Wen Liu, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Kristine N Williams","doi":"10.1177/01939459241233360","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>It is essential to characterize communication patterns for better health outcomes for family caregivers and persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to examine the relationships between communication patterns and the characteristics of dyads of family caregivers and persons living with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis was conducted using 75 video-recorded home care observations from 19 dyads. Participant characteristics and caregiver burden, depression, and sense of competence were collected from the parent study. The video-recorded dyadic communication patterns were assessed using a coding scheme developed based on Communication Accommodation Theory and Classical Test Theory. The relative frequency of the communication patterns was compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 8311 caregiver and 8024 care recipient communication behaviors were observed. Caregiver communication patterns were categorized as facilitative, disabling, and neutral. Care recipient communication patterns were categorized as engaging, challenging, and neutral. Caregiver gender, care recipient gender, care recipient education level, dementia diagnosis length, types of dementia, dyadic gender difference, burden, depression, and competence of caregiver, and types of communication were significantly associated with caregiver communication. Dementia diagnosis length, caregiver competence, dyadic gender difference, and types of communication were significantly associated with care recipient communication.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings demonstrated different communication patterns depending on individual and dyad characteristics and evidence for dyadic communication support to promote meaningful interaction for persons living with dementia. Further analysis is needed to identify mediating factors and causal relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"264-277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10955794/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241233360","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: It is essential to characterize communication patterns for better health outcomes for family caregivers and persons living with dementia.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the relationships between communication patterns and the characteristics of dyads of family caregivers and persons living with dementia.

Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted using 75 video-recorded home care observations from 19 dyads. Participant characteristics and caregiver burden, depression, and sense of competence were collected from the parent study. The video-recorded dyadic communication patterns were assessed using a coding scheme developed based on Communication Accommodation Theory and Classical Test Theory. The relative frequency of the communication patterns was compared between groups.

Results: Overall, 8311 caregiver and 8024 care recipient communication behaviors were observed. Caregiver communication patterns were categorized as facilitative, disabling, and neutral. Care recipient communication patterns were categorized as engaging, challenging, and neutral. Caregiver gender, care recipient gender, care recipient education level, dementia diagnosis length, types of dementia, dyadic gender difference, burden, depression, and competence of caregiver, and types of communication were significantly associated with caregiver communication. Dementia diagnosis length, caregiver competence, dyadic gender difference, and types of communication were significantly associated with care recipient communication.

Conclusions: The findings demonstrated different communication patterns depending on individual and dyad characteristics and evidence for dyadic communication support to promote meaningful interaction for persons living with dementia. Further analysis is needed to identify mediating factors and causal relationships.

家庭照顾者与痴呆症患者的沟通模式和特点:视频观察的二次分析。
背景:为改善痴呆症患者的健康状况,研究沟通模式的特点至关重要:为了改善家庭照顾者和痴呆症患者的健康状况,了解沟通模式的特点至关重要:本研究旨在探讨沟通模式与家庭照顾者和痴呆症患者之间的关系:方法:使用 19 个二人组的 75 个家庭护理观察录像进行二次分析。参与者的特征、照顾者的负担、抑郁程度和能力感都是从母体研究中收集的。根据沟通适应理论和经典测试理论制定的编码方案,对录制的两人沟通模式进行了评估。比较了不同组间沟通模式的相对频率:总计观察到 8311 种照顾者和 8024 种接受照顾者的沟通行为。护理者的沟通模式分为促进型、失能型和中性型。受护者的沟通模式分为参与型、挑战型和中性。照护者性别、受照护者性别、受照护者教育水平、痴呆诊断时间、痴呆类型、双方性别差异、照护者的负担、抑郁和能力以及沟通类型与照护者沟通有显著相关性。痴呆诊断时间长短、照顾者能力、双方性别差异和沟通类型与受照顾者的沟通有明显关系:研究结果表明,不同的沟通模式取决于个人和双方的特征,并证明双方的沟通支持可促进痴呆症患者进行有意义的互动。需要进一步分析以确定中介因素和因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信