Individual variation in bilingual vocabulary in preschoolers with developmental language disorder

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Lisa Verbeek , Tijs Kleemans , Constance T.W.M. Vissers , Eliane Segers , Ludo Verhoeven
{"title":"Individual variation in bilingual vocabulary in preschoolers with developmental language disorder","authors":"Lisa Verbeek ,&nbsp;Tijs Kleemans ,&nbsp;Constance T.W.M. Vissers ,&nbsp;Eliane Segers ,&nbsp;Ludo Verhoeven","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is unclear how speech production, selective attention, and phonological working memory are related to first- (L1) and second-language (L2) vocabularies in bilingual preschoolers with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD).</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To study individual variation in vocabularies in DLD bilingual preschoolers by (1) comparing them to typically developing (TD) bilingual, and TD and DLD monolingual peers; (2) differentially predicting L2 vocabulary; and (3) identifying and characterizing bilinguals’ L1/L2 vocabulary profiles.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We measured the selective attention, working memory, and L1 Turkish/Polish (where applicable) and L1/L2 Dutch speech and vocabulary abilities of 31 DLD bilingual, 37 TD bilingual, and 61 DLD and 54 TD Dutch monolingual three-to-five year-olds.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>DLD bilinguals scored lower than TD bilinguals and TD/DLD monolinguals on all measures, except L2 vocabulary, where all bilinguals underperformed all monolinguals. Selective attention predicted Dutch vocabulary across groups. Three bilingual vocabulary profiles emerged: DLD bilinguals were less likely to be <em>L1 dominant,</em> TD/DLD bilinguals with better attention more often had a <em>Balanced high L1/L2 profile</em>, while those with poorer selective attention and L1 speech tended to be <em>L2 dominant</em>.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings highlight the roles of L1 speech and selective attention, rather than L2 speech and working memory, in understanding bilingual vocabulary variation among DLD preschoolers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000271/pdfft?md5=b0e049b14ac8cdfae90ab72c0300701d&pid=1-s2.0-S0891422224000271-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422224000271","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is unclear how speech production, selective attention, and phonological working memory are related to first- (L1) and second-language (L2) vocabularies in bilingual preschoolers with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD).

Aims

To study individual variation in vocabularies in DLD bilingual preschoolers by (1) comparing them to typically developing (TD) bilingual, and TD and DLD monolingual peers; (2) differentially predicting L2 vocabulary; and (3) identifying and characterizing bilinguals’ L1/L2 vocabulary profiles.

Methods

We measured the selective attention, working memory, and L1 Turkish/Polish (where applicable) and L1/L2 Dutch speech and vocabulary abilities of 31 DLD bilingual, 37 TD bilingual, and 61 DLD and 54 TD Dutch monolingual three-to-five year-olds.

Results

DLD bilinguals scored lower than TD bilinguals and TD/DLD monolinguals on all measures, except L2 vocabulary, where all bilinguals underperformed all monolinguals. Selective attention predicted Dutch vocabulary across groups. Three bilingual vocabulary profiles emerged: DLD bilinguals were less likely to be L1 dominant, TD/DLD bilinguals with better attention more often had a Balanced high L1/L2 profile, while those with poorer selective attention and L1 speech tended to be L2 dominant.

Conclusions

These findings highlight the roles of L1 speech and selective attention, rather than L2 speech and working memory, in understanding bilingual vocabulary variation among DLD preschoolers.

语言发育障碍学龄前儿童双语词汇的个体差异
背景目前尚不清楚,在患有发育性语言障碍(DLD)的学龄前双语儿童中,语音生成、选择性注意和语音工作记忆与第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)词汇量之间的关系。目的通过以下方法研究DLD双语学龄前儿童词汇量的个体差异:(1)将他们与发育正常(TD)双语儿童、TD和DLD单语儿童进行比较;(2)对L2词汇量进行不同的预测;(3)确定和描述双语儿童的L1/L2词汇量特征。我们测量了 31 名 DLD 双语儿童、37 名 TD 双语儿童、61 名 DLD 和 54 名 TD 荷兰语单语三至五岁儿童的选择性注意、工作记忆、L1 土耳其语/波兰语(如适用)和 L1/L2 荷兰语语音和词汇能力。选择性注意预测了各组的荷兰语词汇量。出现了三种双语词汇特征:DLD 双语者不太可能以 L1 为主导,注意力较好的 TD/DLD 双语者通常具有均衡的高 L1/L2 特征,而选择性注意力和 L1 言语较差的双语者则倾向于以 L2 为主导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.50%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信