The Effects of Family Functioning on Gross Motor Function, Activity, and Participation in Children with Cerebral Palsy.

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-18 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v18i1.32271
Muhammed Samed Dalakçi, Anıl Özüdoğru, Caner Kararti
{"title":"The Effects of Family Functioning on Gross Motor Function, Activity, and Participation in Children with Cerebral Palsy.","authors":"Muhammed Samed Dalakçi, Anıl Özüdoğru, Caner Kararti","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v18i1.32271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate whether family functioning (FF) could impact gross motor function, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy (CP).</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Sixty-seven children with spastic diplegic CP who were admitted to the Special Education and Rehabilitation Clinic were included in the study. The guidelines of the American Academy of Neurology were followed for the diagnosis of spastic diplegia. The type of home where the family lives, the family's average income, the child's age, gender, and number of siblings, and the age and educational level of the child's primary caregiver were recorded. The gross motor function capacity of children with CP was assessed with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) was used to evaluate activity and participation performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The children living in detached houses had statistically higher PEDI mobility levels than those living in apartments (p < 0.05). PEDI's social function and self-care levels were higher in 12 to 18-year-old children with two siblings (p < 0.05). The age and educational status of the primary caregiver were found to have an important impact on the PEDI scores. According to the results, social function and self-care levels were higher in children whose primary caregivers were 30 to 65 years old and had high levels of education above high school (p < 0.05 The effects of family income and gender on PEDI scores were statistically non-significant (p˃ 0.05). Variables related to family functioning had no statistically significant effect on GMFCS scores (p˃ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These factors can enable healthcare providers to collaborate with the families to develop more comprehensive intervention plans emphasizing family strengths and supporting their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10874512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v18i1.32271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The present study aimed to investigate whether family functioning (FF) could impact gross motor function, activity, and participation in children with cerebral palsy (CP).

Materials & methods: Sixty-seven children with spastic diplegic CP who were admitted to the Special Education and Rehabilitation Clinic were included in the study. The guidelines of the American Academy of Neurology were followed for the diagnosis of spastic diplegia. The type of home where the family lives, the family's average income, the child's age, gender, and number of siblings, and the age and educational level of the child's primary caregiver were recorded. The gross motor function capacity of children with CP was assessed with the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS). The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI) was used to evaluate activity and participation performance.

Results: The children living in detached houses had statistically higher PEDI mobility levels than those living in apartments (p < 0.05). PEDI's social function and self-care levels were higher in 12 to 18-year-old children with two siblings (p < 0.05). The age and educational status of the primary caregiver were found to have an important impact on the PEDI scores. According to the results, social function and self-care levels were higher in children whose primary caregivers were 30 to 65 years old and had high levels of education above high school (p < 0.05 The effects of family income and gender on PEDI scores were statistically non-significant (p˃ 0.05). Variables related to family functioning had no statistically significant effect on GMFCS scores (p˃ 0.05).

Conclusion: These factors can enable healthcare providers to collaborate with the families to develop more comprehensive intervention plans emphasizing family strengths and supporting their needs.

家庭功能对大脑性麻痹儿童粗大运动功能、活动和参与的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨家庭功能(FF)是否会影响脑瘫儿童的大运动功能、活动和参与:本研究旨在探讨家庭功能(FF)是否会影响脑瘫(CP)儿童的大运动功能、活动和参与:研究纳入了 67 名特殊教育和康复诊所收治的痉挛性偏瘫 CP 患儿。痉挛性截瘫的诊断遵循美国神经病学学会的指南。研究还记录了家庭居住类型、家庭平均收入、儿童年龄、性别、兄弟姐妹数量以及儿童主要照顾者的年龄和教育水平。用粗大运动功能分类系统(GMFCS)评估了 CP 儿童的粗大运动功能能力。儿科残疾评估量表(PEDI)用于评估活动和参与表现:结果:与居住在公寓的儿童相比,居住在独立房屋的儿童的 PEDI 活动能力水平更高(P < 0.05)。有两个兄弟姐妹的 12 至 18 岁儿童的社会功能和自理能力的 PEDI 水平更高(P < 0.05)。主要照顾者的年龄和教育状况对 PEDI 分数有重要影响。结果显示,主要照顾者年龄在 30 至 65 岁之间且教育程度在高中以上的儿童的社会功能和自理能力水平更高(p < 0.05)。与家庭功能相关的变量对 GMFCS 分数的影响无统计学意义(p˃ 0.05):这些因素可以帮助医疗服务提供者与家庭合作,制定更全面的干预计划,强调家庭的优势并支持他们的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信