Adolescent neurocognitive development and decision-making abilities regarding gender-affirming care

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Orma Ravindranath , Maria I. Perica , Ashley C. Parr , Amar Ojha , Shane D. McKeon , Gerald Montano , Naomi Ullendorff , Beatriz Luna , E. Kale Edmiston
{"title":"Adolescent neurocognitive development and decision-making abilities regarding gender-affirming care","authors":"Orma Ravindranath ,&nbsp;Maria I. Perica ,&nbsp;Ashley C. Parr ,&nbsp;Amar Ojha ,&nbsp;Shane D. McKeon ,&nbsp;Gerald Montano ,&nbsp;Naomi Ullendorff ,&nbsp;Beatriz Luna ,&nbsp;E. Kale Edmiston","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Recently, politicians and legislative bodies have cited neurodevelopmental literature to argue that brain immaturity undermines decision-making regarding gender-affirming care (GAC) in youth. Here, we review this literature as it applies to adolescents’ ability to make decisions regarding GAC. The research shows that while adolescence is a time of peak risk-taking behavior that may lead to impulsive decisions, neurocognitive systems supporting adult-level decisions are available given deliberative processes that minimize influence of short-term rewards and peers. Since GAC decisions occur over an extended period and with support from adult caregivers and clinicians, adolescents can engage adult-level decision-making in this context. We also weigh the benefits of providing GAC access during adolescence and consider the significant costs of blocking or delaying GAC. Transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents face significant mental health challenges, many of which are mitigated by GAC access. Further, initiating the GAC process during adolescence, which we define as beginning at pubertal onset, leads to better long-term mental health outcomes than waiting until adulthood. Taken together, existing research indicates that many adolescents can make informed decisions regarding gender-affirming care, and that this care is critical for the well-being of TNB youth. We highlight relevant considerations for policy makers, researchers, and clinicians.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000124/pdfft?md5=670a2a5407e04acfc8b1cf4149421e42&pid=1-s2.0-S1878929324000124-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929324000124","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, politicians and legislative bodies have cited neurodevelopmental literature to argue that brain immaturity undermines decision-making regarding gender-affirming care (GAC) in youth. Here, we review this literature as it applies to adolescents’ ability to make decisions regarding GAC. The research shows that while adolescence is a time of peak risk-taking behavior that may lead to impulsive decisions, neurocognitive systems supporting adult-level decisions are available given deliberative processes that minimize influence of short-term rewards and peers. Since GAC decisions occur over an extended period and with support from adult caregivers and clinicians, adolescents can engage adult-level decision-making in this context. We also weigh the benefits of providing GAC access during adolescence and consider the significant costs of blocking or delaying GAC. Transgender and non-binary (TNB) adolescents face significant mental health challenges, many of which are mitigated by GAC access. Further, initiating the GAC process during adolescence, which we define as beginning at pubertal onset, leads to better long-term mental health outcomes than waiting until adulthood. Taken together, existing research indicates that many adolescents can make informed decisions regarding gender-affirming care, and that this care is critical for the well-being of TNB youth. We highlight relevant considerations for policy makers, researchers, and clinicians.

青少年的神经认知发展和有关性别平等护理的决策能力
最近,政治家和立法机构引用神经发育方面的文献,认为大脑发育不成熟会影响青少年在性别确认护理(GAC)方面的决策。在此,我们将对这些文献进行回顾,因为它们适用于青少年就 GAC 做出决定的能力。研究表明,虽然青春期是冒险行为的高峰期,可能会导致冲动性决策,但由于慎重考虑的过程能最大限度地减少短期奖励和同伴的影响,因此支持成人水平决策的神经认知系统是可用的。由于普通儿童咨询中心的决策会持续较长时间,并得到成年照顾者和临床医生的支持,因此青少年可以在这种情况下做出成人水平的决策。我们还权衡了在青春期提供性别咨询的益处,并考虑了阻止或延迟性别咨询的巨大代价。变性和非二元性(TNB)青少年面临着巨大的心理健康挑战,而 GAC 的使用可以缓解其中的许多挑战。此外,在青春期(我们将其定义为从青春期开始)启动性别咨询与辅导过程,会比等到成年后再进行更能带来长期的心理健康结果。综上所述,现有研究表明,许多青少年都能在性别确认护理方面做出明智的决定,而且这种护理对 TNB 青少年的福祉至关重要。我们强调了政策制定者、研究人员和临床医生的相关注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信