Antimicrobial residues in meat from chickens in Northeast Vietnam: analytical validation and pilot study for sampling optimisation

IF 1.4 3区 农林科学 Q4 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Sophie Hedges, Ludovic Pelligand, Liwei Chen, Kelyn Seow, Thuy Thi Hoang, Huong Quynh Luu, Son Thi Thanh Dang, Ngoc Thi Pham, Hoa Thi Thanh Pham, Yeong Cheng Cheah, Yulan Wang, Dominique Hurtaud-Pessel, Anne Conan, Guillaume Fournié, Damer Blake, Fiona Tomley, Patricia L. Conway
{"title":"Antimicrobial residues in meat from chickens in Northeast Vietnam: analytical validation and pilot study for sampling optimisation","authors":"Sophie Hedges,&nbsp;Ludovic Pelligand,&nbsp;Liwei Chen,&nbsp;Kelyn Seow,&nbsp;Thuy Thi Hoang,&nbsp;Huong Quynh Luu,&nbsp;Son Thi Thanh Dang,&nbsp;Ngoc Thi Pham,&nbsp;Hoa Thi Thanh Pham,&nbsp;Yeong Cheng Cheah,&nbsp;Yulan Wang,&nbsp;Dominique Hurtaud-Pessel,&nbsp;Anne Conan,&nbsp;Guillaume Fournié,&nbsp;Damer Blake,&nbsp;Fiona Tomley,&nbsp;Patricia L. Conway","doi":"10.1007/s00003-024-01478-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Antimicrobials used in chicken farming for therapeutic and/or prophylactic purposes may result in unacceptable levels of edible residues, if withdrawal periods are not respected. To evaluate the risk in Vietnam, we validated an analytical method to detect antimicrobial residues from chicken meat samples and carried out a pilot cross-sectional study to identify optimal sampling strategies. A total of 45 raw meat samples were collected from 4 markets, 1 slaughterhouse and 4 farms (5 per site) in Northern Vietnam, between March and April 2021. Farmers were asked about antimicrobials used during sampled production cycles (5 chickens sampled per batch). Samples were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the presence of 68 antimicrobials at a pre-defined validation concentration. 7 compounds were identified from 4 classes (tetracyclines, sulphonamides, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones). In markets, where the source of sampled chickens was unknown, a diverse pool of residual antimicrobials was detected in 20% (4/20) of the meat samples. No residues were detected in samples from the slaughterhouse. No residues were detected in chickens from the one farm that reported using antimicrobials, whereas sulfadimethoxine, doxycycline and tilmicosin residues were identified from the other 3 farms reporting no antimicrobial use. The probability of detecting antimicrobial residues present in a flock based on sampling a single chicken was estimated at 0.93 (highest density interval 0.735–0.997). The preliminary results suggest a disparity between farmers’ reports on antimicrobial drug use and actual usage, and that the analysis of a single sample per farm has a high probability of detecting antimicrobial residues, if present.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":622,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","volume":"19 2","pages":"225 - 234"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-024-01478-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00003-024-01478-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antimicrobials used in chicken farming for therapeutic and/or prophylactic purposes may result in unacceptable levels of edible residues, if withdrawal periods are not respected. To evaluate the risk in Vietnam, we validated an analytical method to detect antimicrobial residues from chicken meat samples and carried out a pilot cross-sectional study to identify optimal sampling strategies. A total of 45 raw meat samples were collected from 4 markets, 1 slaughterhouse and 4 farms (5 per site) in Northern Vietnam, between March and April 2021. Farmers were asked about antimicrobials used during sampled production cycles (5 chickens sampled per batch). Samples were analysed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry for the presence of 68 antimicrobials at a pre-defined validation concentration. 7 compounds were identified from 4 classes (tetracyclines, sulphonamides, macrolides, and fluoroquinolones). In markets, where the source of sampled chickens was unknown, a diverse pool of residual antimicrobials was detected in 20% (4/20) of the meat samples. No residues were detected in samples from the slaughterhouse. No residues were detected in chickens from the one farm that reported using antimicrobials, whereas sulfadimethoxine, doxycycline and tilmicosin residues were identified from the other 3 farms reporting no antimicrobial use. The probability of detecting antimicrobial residues present in a flock based on sampling a single chicken was estimated at 0.93 (highest density interval 0.735–0.997). The preliminary results suggest a disparity between farmers’ reports on antimicrobial drug use and actual usage, and that the analysis of a single sample per farm has a high probability of detecting antimicrobial residues, if present.

Abstract Image

越南东北部鸡肉中的抗菌剂残留:分析验证和优化采样的试点研究
如果不遵守停药期规定,养鸡业中用于治疗和/或预防目的的抗菌剂可能会导致不可接受的食用残留水平。为了评估越南的风险,我们验证了从鸡肉样本中检测抗菌剂残留的分析方法,并开展了一项试点横断面研究,以确定最佳采样策略。2021 年 3 月至 4 月期间,我们从越南北部的 4 个市场、1 个屠宰场和 4 个农场(每个地点 5 个)共采集了 45 份生肉样本。养殖户被问及在采样生产周期内使用抗菌素的情况(每批采样 5 只鸡)。采用液相色谱-串联质谱法对样本进行分析,以确定68种抗菌剂的存在,并预先设定了验证浓度。从 4 个类别(四环素类、磺胺类、大环内酯类和氟喹诺酮类)中鉴定出 7 种化合物。在鸡肉样本来源不明的市场,20%(4/20)的肉类样本中检测到多种残留抗菌素。来自屠宰场的样本未检测到残留抗菌素。在一个报告使用抗菌素的农场的鸡肉中未检测到残留抗菌素,而在另外三个报告未使用抗菌素的农场的鸡肉中检测到磺胺二甲氧嘧啶、强力霉素和替米考星残留。根据对单只鸡的采样,在鸡群中检测到抗菌素残留的概率估计为 0.93(最高密度区间为 0.735-0.997)。初步结果表明,养殖户对抗菌药物使用情况的报告与实际使用情况之间存在差异,如果存在抗菌药物残留,对每个养殖场的单个样本进行分析,检测出抗菌药物残留的概率很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The JCF publishes peer-reviewed original Research Articles and Opinions that are of direct importance to Food and Feed Safety. This includes Food Packaging, Consumer Products as well as Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering. All peer-reviewed articles that are published should be devoted to improve Consumer Health Protection. Reviews and discussions are welcomed that address legal and/or regulatory decisions with respect to risk assessment and management of Food and Feed Safety issues on a scientific basis. It addresses an international readership of scientists, risk assessors and managers, and other professionals active in the field of Food and Feed Safety and Consumer Health Protection. Manuscripts – preferably written in English but also in German – are published as Research Articles, Reviews, Methods and Short Communications and should cover aspects including, but not limited to: · Factors influencing Food and Feed Safety · Factors influencing Consumer Health Protection · Factors influencing Consumer Behavior · Exposure science related to Risk Assessment and Risk Management · Regulatory aspects related to Food and Feed Safety, Food Packaging, Consumer Products, Plant Protection Products, Food Microbiology, Veterinary Drugs, Animal Welfare and Genetic Engineering · Analytical methods and method validation related to food control and food processing. The JCF also presents important News, as well as Announcements and Reports about administrative surveillance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信