{"title":"Evaluation of executive functions in children and adolescents with obesity.","authors":"Enver Üney, Hüseyin Burak Baykara, Sibelnur Avcil","doi":"10.1080/21622965.2024.2312442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to evaluation of executive functions of obese children and adolescents. Thirty children and adolescents with obesity between the ages of 11 and 18 and thirty age- and sex-matched healthy weight-peers were included. Participants with a body mass index (BMI) value of 5 to 85thpercentile and >95thpercentile were classified as normal and obese, respectively. Turkish Version of Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL-T) was applied for excluding participants with psychiatric diagnoses. All children and their parents were asked to fill out Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) to evaluate executive functions. Children with obesity tended to complete Part 4 and Part 5 of SCWT in longer time (<i>p = 0.043 and p = 0.018, respectively).</i> Rate of obesity was higher among nuclear family members (<i>p = 0.001</i>) with a higher number of relatives positive for history of a psychiatric disorder (<i>p = 0.020</i>). While children with obesity reported higher rates of peer problems as measured by SDQ (<i>p = 0.030</i>), there was no significant difference in parent forms. In conclusion, although children with obesity may have disruptions in their executive functions to some degree, this does not refer a generalized impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8047,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology: Child","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2024.2312442","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluation of executive functions of obese children and adolescents. Thirty children and adolescents with obesity between the ages of 11 and 18 and thirty age- and sex-matched healthy weight-peers were included. Participants with a body mass index (BMI) value of 5 to 85thpercentile and >95thpercentile were classified as normal and obese, respectively. Turkish Version of Kiddy Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL-T) was applied for excluding participants with psychiatric diagnoses. All children and their parents were asked to fill out Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ), Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), and Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) to evaluate executive functions. Children with obesity tended to complete Part 4 and Part 5 of SCWT in longer time (p = 0.043 and p = 0.018, respectively). Rate of obesity was higher among nuclear family members (p = 0.001) with a higher number of relatives positive for history of a psychiatric disorder (p = 0.020). While children with obesity reported higher rates of peer problems as measured by SDQ (p = 0.030), there was no significant difference in parent forms. In conclusion, although children with obesity may have disruptions in their executive functions to some degree, this does not refer a generalized impairment.
期刊介绍:
Applied Neuropsychology: Child publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in children. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of child patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.