What Predicts Beneficial Outcomes in Psychedelic Use? A Quantitative Content Analysis of Psychedelic Health Outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Elias C Acevedo, Scott Uhler, Kaitlyn P White, Laith Al-Shawaf
{"title":"What Predicts Beneficial Outcomes in Psychedelic Use? A Quantitative Content Analysis of Psychedelic Health Outcomes.","authors":"Elias C Acevedo, Scott Uhler, Kaitlyn P White, Laith Al-Shawaf","doi":"10.1080/02791072.2024.2314729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interest in psychedelics and their possible therapeutic potential has been growing. <i>Metaphysical belief theory</i> asserts that these benefits stem from the adoption of comforting supernatural beliefs following a mystical experience. By contrast, <i>predictive self-binding theory</i> suggests that the beneficial outcomes of psychedelics are primarily driven by psychological insights. The present study tests these competing models of psychedelic benefits. We conducted a quantitative content analysis on unsolicited self-reports of psychedelic users available on Erowid.org, to examine the potential relations between psychological insight, ego dissolution, therapeutic intent, altered metaphysical belief, and enduring health outcomes. We randomly selected, coded, and analyzed two hundred forty psychedelic experience reports from the website. Path analysis using structural equation modeling showed that psychological insight, not metaphysical beliefs, uniquely predicted beneficial outcomes. Moreover, beneficial outcomes' positive relation to ego dissolution and therapeutic intent was fully mediated by psychological insight. These findings support the predictive self-binding model over the metaphysical belief model.</p>","PeriodicalId":16902,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychoactive drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02791072.2024.2314729","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interest in psychedelics and their possible therapeutic potential has been growing. Metaphysical belief theory asserts that these benefits stem from the adoption of comforting supernatural beliefs following a mystical experience. By contrast, predictive self-binding theory suggests that the beneficial outcomes of psychedelics are primarily driven by psychological insights. The present study tests these competing models of psychedelic benefits. We conducted a quantitative content analysis on unsolicited self-reports of psychedelic users available on Erowid.org, to examine the potential relations between psychological insight, ego dissolution, therapeutic intent, altered metaphysical belief, and enduring health outcomes. We randomly selected, coded, and analyzed two hundred forty psychedelic experience reports from the website. Path analysis using structural equation modeling showed that psychological insight, not metaphysical beliefs, uniquely predicted beneficial outcomes. Moreover, beneficial outcomes' positive relation to ego dissolution and therapeutic intent was fully mediated by psychological insight. These findings support the predictive self-binding model over the metaphysical belief model.

什么能预测使用迷幻剂的有益结果?对迷幻剂健康结果的定量内容分析。
人们对迷幻剂及其可能的治疗潜力的兴趣与日俱增。形而上学信仰理论认为,这些益处源于神秘体验后令人欣慰的超自然信仰。与此相反,预测性自我束缚理论认为,迷幻药的益处主要来自于心理洞察力。本研究对这些相互竞争的迷幻药益处模型进行了检验。我们对 Erowid.org 网站上迷幻药使用者主动提供的自我报告进行了定量内容分析,以研究心理洞察力、自我解体、治疗意图、形而上学信仰改变和持久健康结果之间的潜在关系。我们从网站上随机抽取了 240 份迷幻体验报告,并对其进行了编码和分析。使用结构方程模型进行的路径分析显示,心理洞察力而非形而上学信仰是预测有益结果的唯一因素。此外,有益结果与自我解体和治疗意图之间的正相关完全由心理洞察力中介。这些研究结果支持预测性自我约束模型,而非形而上学信仰模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信