A. Saade , B. Wyplosz , M. Baldeyrou , C. Paris , P. Tattevin , C. Janssen , for the SPILF group “Vaccination et Prévention”
{"title":"Infection prevention for immunocompromised patients: A cross-translational multicentric survey of current organization in France","authors":"A. Saade , B. Wyplosz , M. Baldeyrou , C. Paris , P. Tattevin , C. Janssen , for the SPILF group “Vaccination et Prévention”","doi":"10.1016/j.idnow.2024.104863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate current organization of infection prevention for immunocompromised patients (ICP) at a countrywide level.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nationwide cross-sectional multicenter study based on an online survey disseminated in 2022 to physicians invested with preventive healthcare missions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 341 physicians (96% graduates, 32% infectious disease specialists), participated in the survey, with a median age of 40 [35–51] years. On-site access to infection prevention consultations for ICP was reported by 30%, dedicated pre-travel consultations for ICPs by 29%, consultations for infection prevention in solid organ transplant candidates by 16% and return-to-work consultations for ICPs by 6%. Most participants (73%) were aware of nationwide vaccination guidelines for ICP, while 50% felt comfortable using them. Tools for infection prevention advice and ICP vaccination had been developed by 10%, while 89% would have appreciated access to tools developed by others.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Infection prevention for ICPs remains neglected. Guidelines covering all fields of prevention for ICPs would be more than welcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13539,"journal":{"name":"Infectious diseases now","volume":"54 2","pages":"Article 104863"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000186/pdfft?md5=74fa29acbe7c3ae2ea217f07b4970822&pid=1-s2.0-S2666991924000186-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious diseases now","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666991924000186","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To evaluate current organization of infection prevention for immunocompromised patients (ICP) at a countrywide level.
Methods
Nationwide cross-sectional multicenter study based on an online survey disseminated in 2022 to physicians invested with preventive healthcare missions.
Results
A total of 341 physicians (96% graduates, 32% infectious disease specialists), participated in the survey, with a median age of 40 [35–51] years. On-site access to infection prevention consultations for ICP was reported by 30%, dedicated pre-travel consultations for ICPs by 29%, consultations for infection prevention in solid organ transplant candidates by 16% and return-to-work consultations for ICPs by 6%. Most participants (73%) were aware of nationwide vaccination guidelines for ICP, while 50% felt comfortable using them. Tools for infection prevention advice and ICP vaccination had been developed by 10%, while 89% would have appreciated access to tools developed by others.
Conclusions
Infection prevention for ICPs remains neglected. Guidelines covering all fields of prevention for ICPs would be more than welcome.