The problem of calculating the prevalence of sexual dysfunction: a meta-analysis attending gender.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Javier Ramírez-Santos, Delia Cristóbal-Cañadas, Tesifón Parron-Carreño, David Lozano-Paniagua, Bruno José Nievas-Soriano
{"title":"The problem of calculating the prevalence of sexual dysfunction: a meta-analysis attending gender.","authors":"Javier Ramírez-Santos, Delia Cristóbal-Cañadas, Tesifón Parron-Carreño, David Lozano-Paniagua, Bruno José Nievas-Soriano","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qead058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sexuality is an integral part of human health, and sexual dysfunctions are prevalent issues that affect men and women. While reviews on sexual dysfunctions in various diseases have been conducted, overall data are scarce.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To update the overall prevalence of sexual dysfunctions from available prevalence studies on both sexes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a 2-phase selection process to include cross-sectional studies that were conducted on the adult population and published between 2017 and 2022. The extracted data were prevalence, methodology, sample size, and location. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review analyzed 4407 studies. Twenty-three met the established criteria: 9 on the male population and 14 on the female population. The meta-analysis included 7 articles on males and 13 on females. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 31% in men and 41% in women, with significant heterogeneity among the studies. Sociocultural differences and use of varying measurement methods were identified as the main factors contributing to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis revealed decreased heterogeneity among studies that used the Female Sexual Function Index as a diagnostic tool for females.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The review highlights the notable variability in results due to methodological and geographic variations. Therefore, enhancing the training of professionals and standardizing the recording of patient data-through the Female Sexual Function Index and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire or by developing new ones for this purpose-could improve the consistency of research on sexual health.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead058","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sexuality is an integral part of human health, and sexual dysfunctions are prevalent issues that affect men and women. While reviews on sexual dysfunctions in various diseases have been conducted, overall data are scarce.

Objectives: To update the overall prevalence of sexual dysfunctions from available prevalence studies on both sexes.

Methods: We used a 2-phase selection process to include cross-sectional studies that were conducted on the adult population and published between 2017 and 2022. The extracted data were prevalence, methodology, sample size, and location. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to assess heterogeneity.

Results: This review analyzed 4407 studies. Twenty-three met the established criteria: 9 on the male population and 14 on the female population. The meta-analysis included 7 articles on males and 13 on females. The prevalence of sexual dysfunction was 31% in men and 41% in women, with significant heterogeneity among the studies. Sociocultural differences and use of varying measurement methods were identified as the main factors contributing to heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis revealed decreased heterogeneity among studies that used the Female Sexual Function Index as a diagnostic tool for females.

Conclusions: The review highlights the notable variability in results due to methodological and geographic variations. Therefore, enhancing the training of professionals and standardizing the recording of patient data-through the Female Sexual Function Index and Male Sexual Health Questionnaire or by developing new ones for this purpose-could improve the consistency of research on sexual health.

计算性功能障碍患病率的问题:一项考虑性别因素的荟萃分析。
导言性是人类健康不可分割的一部分,性功能障碍是影响男性和女性的普遍问题。虽然已经对各种疾病中的性功能障碍进行了综述,但总体数据仍然很少:从现有的男女性功能障碍患病率研究中更新性功能障碍的总体患病率:我们采用两阶段筛选法,纳入了 2017 年至 2022 年间发表的、针对成年人群进行的横断面研究。提取的数据包括患病率、方法、样本量和地点。为评估异质性,还进行了敏感性分析和亚组分析:本综述分析了 4407 项研究。其中 23 项符合既定标准:其中 9 项针对男性人群,14 项针对女性人群。荟萃分析包括 7 篇男性文章和 13 篇女性文章。性功能障碍的发病率男性为 31%,女性为 41%,各研究之间存在显著的异质性。社会文化差异和使用不同的测量方法被认为是导致异质性的主要因素。分组分析显示,使用女性性功能指数作为女性诊断工具的研究之间的异质性有所降低:综述强调了由于方法和地域的不同而导致的结果的显著差异。因此,通过女性性功能指数和男性性健康问卷或为此开发新的问卷,加强对专业人员的培训并规范患者数据的记录,可以提高性健康研究的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信