User acceptance and adoption dynamics of ChatGPT in educational settings

Q1 Mathematics
Paul Bazelais, D. Lemay, Tenzin Doleck
{"title":"User acceptance and adoption dynamics of ChatGPT in educational settings","authors":"Paul Bazelais, D. Lemay, Tenzin Doleck","doi":"10.29333/ejmste/14151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent developments in natural language understanding have sparked a great amount of interest in the large language models such as ChatGPT that contain billions of parameters and are trained for thousands of hours on all the textual data of the internet. ChatGPT has received immense attention because it has widespread applications, which it is able to do out-of-the-box, with no prior training or fine-tuning. These models show emergent skill and can perform virtually any textual task and provide glimmers, or “sparks”, of artificial general intelligence, in the form of a general problem solver as envisioned by Newell and Simon in the early days of artificial intelligence research. Researchers are now exploring the opportunities of ChatGPT in education. Yet, the factors influencing and driving users’ acceptance of ChatGPT remains largely unexplored. This study investigates users’ (n=138) acceptance of ChatGPT. We test a structural model developed using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. The study reveals that performance expectancy is related to behavioral intention, which in turn is related to ChatGPT use. Findings are discussed within the context of mass adoption and the challenges and opportunities for teaching and learning. The findings provide empirical grounding to support understanding of technology acceptance decisions through the lens of students’ use of ChatGPT and further document the influence of situational factors on technology acceptance more broadly. This research contributes to body of knowledge and facilitates future research on digital innovation acceptance and use.","PeriodicalId":35438,"journal":{"name":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","volume":"27 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent developments in natural language understanding have sparked a great amount of interest in the large language models such as ChatGPT that contain billions of parameters and are trained for thousands of hours on all the textual data of the internet. ChatGPT has received immense attention because it has widespread applications, which it is able to do out-of-the-box, with no prior training or fine-tuning. These models show emergent skill and can perform virtually any textual task and provide glimmers, or “sparks”, of artificial general intelligence, in the form of a general problem solver as envisioned by Newell and Simon in the early days of artificial intelligence research. Researchers are now exploring the opportunities of ChatGPT in education. Yet, the factors influencing and driving users’ acceptance of ChatGPT remains largely unexplored. This study investigates users’ (n=138) acceptance of ChatGPT. We test a structural model developed using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. The study reveals that performance expectancy is related to behavioral intention, which in turn is related to ChatGPT use. Findings are discussed within the context of mass adoption and the challenges and opportunities for teaching and learning. The findings provide empirical grounding to support understanding of technology acceptance decisions through the lens of students’ use of ChatGPT and further document the influence of situational factors on technology acceptance more broadly. This research contributes to body of knowledge and facilitates future research on digital innovation acceptance and use.
教育环境中用户对 ChatGPT 的接受度和采用动态
自然语言理解领域的最新发展引发了人们对大型语言模型(如 ChatGPT)的极大兴趣,这些模型包含数十亿个参数,并在互联网的所有文本数据上经过数千小时的训练。ChatGPT 之所以受到广泛关注,是因为它应用广泛,无需事先训练或微调,开箱即用。这些模型显示出了新出现的技能,几乎可以完成任何文本任务,并提供了人工通用智能的曙光或 "火花",即纽厄尔和西蒙在人工智能研究早期所设想的通用问题解决程序的形式。目前,研究人员正在探索 ChatGPT 在教育领域的应用机会。然而,影响和推动用户接受 ChatGPT 的因素在很大程度上仍未得到探讨。本研究调查了用户(n=138)对 ChatGPT 的接受程度。我们使用 "技术接受和使用统一理论 "模型对结构模型进行了检验。研究表明,绩效预期与行为意向有关,而行为意向又与 ChatGPT 的使用有关。研究结果在大规模采用的背景下进行了讨论,并探讨了教与学所面临的挑战和机遇。研究结果为通过学生使用 ChatGPT 的视角来理解技术接受决策提供了经验基础,并从更广泛的角度进一步证明了情境因素对技术接受的影响。这项研究为知识体系做出了贡献,并促进了未来有关数字创新接受和使用的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education is peer-reviewed and published 12 times in a year. The Journal is an Open Access Journal. The Journal strictly adheres to the principles of the peer review process. The EJMSTE Journal publishes original articles in the following areas: -Mathematics Education: Algebra Education, Geometry Education, Math Education, Statistics Education. -Science Education: Astronomy Education, Biology Education, Chemistry Education, Geographical and Environmental Education, Geoscience Education, Physics Education, Sustainability Education. -Engineering Education -STEM Education -Technology Education: Human Computer Interactions, Knowledge Management, Learning Management Systems, Distance Education, E-Learning, Blended Learning, ICT/Moodle in Education, Web 2.0 Tools for Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信