Decoding the success of equity crowdfunding: investment decisions of professional and non-professional investors

IF 7.8 3区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Enrico Battisti, Ciro Troise, Antonio Salvi, Michael Christofi
{"title":"Decoding the success of equity crowdfunding: investment decisions of professional and non-professional investors","authors":"Enrico Battisti, Ciro Troise, Antonio Salvi, Michael Christofi","doi":"10.1007/s11846-024-00725-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper investigates the investment decisions of professional and non-professional investors and the role of three classes of factors, i.e. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) orientation, human capital, and composition of ownership, in influencing the performance of equity crowdfunding campaigns, measured in terms of funding collected (in %), final investors involved and the funding amount raised (in €). The quantitative study is focused on the Italian equity crowdfunding market since Italy has been the first country in Europe to regulate this specific model and professional investors are required by law, thus allowing to compare the two classes of investors. Using a sample of 232 campaigns on the two leading Italian ECF platforms, empirical estimates based on regression analyses show that all the three classes of factors determine (or not) the campaigns’ success, and the overall performance is determined by non-professional investors’ orientation. Specifically, our results highlight that CSR orientation does not play a significant role in driving the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns, unlike the human capital and the compositions of ownership.</p>","PeriodicalId":20992,"journal":{"name":"Review of Managerial Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Managerial Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00725-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the investment decisions of professional and non-professional investors and the role of three classes of factors, i.e. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) orientation, human capital, and composition of ownership, in influencing the performance of equity crowdfunding campaigns, measured in terms of funding collected (in %), final investors involved and the funding amount raised (in €). The quantitative study is focused on the Italian equity crowdfunding market since Italy has been the first country in Europe to regulate this specific model and professional investors are required by law, thus allowing to compare the two classes of investors. Using a sample of 232 campaigns on the two leading Italian ECF platforms, empirical estimates based on regression analyses show that all the three classes of factors determine (or not) the campaigns’ success, and the overall performance is determined by non-professional investors’ orientation. Specifically, our results highlight that CSR orientation does not play a significant role in driving the success of equity crowdfunding campaigns, unlike the human capital and the compositions of ownership.

解码股权众筹的成功:专业和非专业投资者的投资决策
本文研究了专业和非专业投资者的投资决策,以及三类因素(即企业社会责任(CSR)导向、人力资本和所有权构成)在影响股权众筹活动绩效方面的作用,以募集资金(单位:%)、最终参与投资者和募集资金额(单位:欧元)为衡量标准。定量研究的重点是意大利的股权众筹市场,因为意大利是欧洲第一个对这种特殊模式进行监管的国家,而且法律规定必须有专业投资者,因此可以对两类投资者进行比较。通过对意大利两个领先的股权众筹平台上的 232 项活动进行抽样调查,基于回归分析的实证估算结果表明,所有三类因素都决定着活动的成功与否,而整体表现则取决于非专业投资者的取向。具体而言,我们的结果突出表明,与人力资本和所有权构成不同,企业社会责任导向在推动股权众筹活动取得成功方面没有发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
14.50%
发文量
86
期刊介绍: Review of Managerial Science (RMS) provides a forum for innovative research from all scientific areas of business administration. The journal publishes original research of high quality and is open to various methodological approaches (analytical modeling, empirical research, experimental work, methodological reasoning etc.). The scope of RMS encompasses – but is not limited to – accounting, auditing, banking, business strategy, corporate governance, entrepreneurship, financial structure and capital markets, health economics, human resources management, information systems, innovation management, insurance, marketing, organization, production and logistics, risk management and taxation. RMS also encourages the submission of papers combining ideas and/or approaches from different areas in an innovative way. Review papers presenting the state of the art of a research area and pointing out new directions for further research are also welcome. The scientific standards of RMS are guaranteed by a rigorous, double-blind peer review process with ad hoc referees and the journal´s internationally composed editorial board.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信