Unveiling the resilience of smallholder farmers in Senegal amidst extreme climate conditions

IF 4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kieron Moller, A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi, Muhammad Talha, Mervis Chikafa, Rasu Eeswaran, Nilson Vieira Junior, Ana Julia Paula Carcedo, Ignacio Ciampitti, Jean-Claude Bizimana, Amadiane Diallo, P. V. Vara Prasad
{"title":"Unveiling the resilience of smallholder farmers in Senegal amidst extreme climate conditions","authors":"Kieron Moller,&nbsp;A. Pouyan Nejadhashemi,&nbsp;Muhammad Talha,&nbsp;Mervis Chikafa,&nbsp;Rasu Eeswaran,&nbsp;Nilson Vieira Junior,&nbsp;Ana Julia Paula Carcedo,&nbsp;Ignacio Ciampitti,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Bizimana,&nbsp;Amadiane Diallo,&nbsp;P. V. Vara Prasad","doi":"10.1002/fes3.523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In Senegal, agriculture is an important sector underpinning the socioeconomic fabric of the populace. Notably, the agricultural production in this region exhibits heightened sensitivity to climatic perturbations, particularly droughts and heat waves. This study aims to determine the resilience of different agronomic interventions for farmers practicing mixed farming that produce both crops (i.e., groundnut (<i>Arachis hypogaea</i> L.) and pearl millet (<i>Pennisetum glaucum</i> (L.) R. Br.)) and raise animals in the Groundnut Basin in Senegal, which holds historical and socioeconomic significance. To understand the current situation regarding demographics, economics, consumption behavior, and farm operations for smallholder farmers, data were comprehensively collected from government and nongovernment organizations (NGO) reports, scientific papers, organization databases, and surveys. Additionally, the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) was used to understand how combinations of three planting dates, three plant densities, and six urea nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates affected the yield of pearl millet, which were used as the alternative scenarios to the baseline in the farm modeling and analyses. All the collected and generated data were used as inputs into the Farm Simulation Model (FARMSIM) to generate economic, nutritional, and risk data associated with mixed farming systems. The generated data were then used to determine the resilience of the alternative scenarios against the baseline. Initially, a multi-objective optimization was employed to meet nutritional needs while maintaining a healthy diet at the lowest cost. Then, the scenarios that met the population's nutritional requirements were evaluated based on four economic indicators: net cash farm income (NCFI), ending cash reserves (EC), net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR). Lastly, those that passed the economic feasibility test were ranked based on risk criteria certainty equivalent (CE) and risk premium (RP). The analyses found N fertilizer rates of 0, 20, and 100 kg N ha<sup>−1</sup> were generally economically not feasible. Additionally, medium (early-July to late-August) and late (late-July to mid-September) planting dates generally performed better than early (early-June to late-July) planting dates, while plant densities of 3.3 and 6.6 pL m<sup>−2</sup> performed better than 1.1. The robust resilience approach introduced in this study is easily transferable to other regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54283,"journal":{"name":"Food and Energy Security","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fes3.523","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Energy Security","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fes3.523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Senegal, agriculture is an important sector underpinning the socioeconomic fabric of the populace. Notably, the agricultural production in this region exhibits heightened sensitivity to climatic perturbations, particularly droughts and heat waves. This study aims to determine the resilience of different agronomic interventions for farmers practicing mixed farming that produce both crops (i.e., groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.)) and raise animals in the Groundnut Basin in Senegal, which holds historical and socioeconomic significance. To understand the current situation regarding demographics, economics, consumption behavior, and farm operations for smallholder farmers, data were comprehensively collected from government and nongovernment organizations (NGO) reports, scientific papers, organization databases, and surveys. Additionally, the Agricultural Production Systems sIMulator (APSIM) was used to understand how combinations of three planting dates, three plant densities, and six urea nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates affected the yield of pearl millet, which were used as the alternative scenarios to the baseline in the farm modeling and analyses. All the collected and generated data were used as inputs into the Farm Simulation Model (FARMSIM) to generate economic, nutritional, and risk data associated with mixed farming systems. The generated data were then used to determine the resilience of the alternative scenarios against the baseline. Initially, a multi-objective optimization was employed to meet nutritional needs while maintaining a healthy diet at the lowest cost. Then, the scenarios that met the population's nutritional requirements were evaluated based on four economic indicators: net cash farm income (NCFI), ending cash reserves (EC), net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR). Lastly, those that passed the economic feasibility test were ranked based on risk criteria certainty equivalent (CE) and risk premium (RP). The analyses found N fertilizer rates of 0, 20, and 100 kg N ha−1 were generally economically not feasible. Additionally, medium (early-July to late-August) and late (late-July to mid-September) planting dates generally performed better than early (early-June to late-July) planting dates, while plant densities of 3.3 and 6.6 pL m−2 performed better than 1.1. The robust resilience approach introduced in this study is easily transferable to other regions.

Abstract Image

揭示塞内加尔小农在极端气候条件下的恢复能力
在塞内加尔,农业是支撑民众社会经济结构的重要部门。值得注意的是,该地区的农业生产对气候扰动(尤其是干旱和热浪)表现出高度敏感性。本研究旨在确定塞内加尔落花生盆地(具有重要的历史和社会经济意义)从事混合耕作的农民对不同农艺干预措施的适应能力,这些混合耕作既生产作物(即落花生(Arachis hypogaea L.)和珍珠粟(Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.),又饲养牲畜。为了解小农的人口、经济、消费行为和农场经营现状,我们从政府和非政府组织报告、科学论文、组织数据库和调查中全面收集了数据。此外,还利用农业生产系统模拟器(APSIM)了解三个播种日期、三种植物密度和六种尿素氮(N)施肥量的组合如何影响珍珠粟的产量,并将其作为农场建模和分析中基线的替代方案。所有收集和生成的数据都被用作农场模拟模型(FARMSIM)的输入,以生成与混合耕作系统相关的经济、营养和风险数据。然后,利用生成的数据确定替代方案相对于基线的复原力。最初,采用了多目标优化方法,以满足营养需求,同时以最低成本维持健康饮食。然后,根据以下四项经济指标对满足人口营养需求的方案进行评估:农场现金净收入(NCFI)、期末现金储备(EC)、净现值(NPV)和内部收益率(IRR)。最后,根据风险标准确定性当量(CE)和风险溢价(RP)对通过经济可行性测试的项目进行排序。分析发现,氮肥施用量为 0、20 和 100 千克/公顷时,经济上普遍不可行。此外,中等(7 月上旬至 8 月下旬)和晚期(7 月下旬至 9 月中旬)播种期的表现一般优于早期(6 月上旬至 7 月下旬)播种期,而 3.3 pL m-2 和 6.6 pL m-2 的植株密度的表现优于 1.1 pL m-2 的植株密度。本研究采用的稳健恢复力方法很容易推广到其他地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food and Energy Security
Food and Energy Security Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Food and Energy Security seeks to publish high quality and high impact original research on agricultural crop and forest productivity to improve food and energy security. It actively seeks submissions from emerging countries with expanding agricultural research communities. Papers from China, other parts of Asia, India and South America are particularly welcome. The Editorial Board, headed by Editor-in-Chief Professor Martin Parry, is determined to make FES the leading publication in its sector and will be aiming for a top-ranking impact factor. Primary research articles should report hypothesis driven investigations that provide new insights into mechanisms and processes that determine productivity and properties for exploitation. Review articles are welcome but they must be critical in approach and provide particularly novel and far reaching insights. Food and Energy Security offers authors a forum for the discussion of the most important advances in this field and promotes an integrative approach of scientific disciplines. Papers must contribute substantially to the advancement of knowledge. Examples of areas covered in Food and Energy Security include: • Agronomy • Biotechnological Approaches • Breeding & Genetics • Climate Change • Quality and Composition • Food Crops and Bioenergy Feedstocks • Developmental, Physiology and Biochemistry • Functional Genomics • Molecular Biology • Pest and Disease Management • Post Harvest Biology • Soil Science • Systems Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信