Testing reliability and validity of practitioner-rated parental sensitivity: A novel tool for practice

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Mirte L. Forrer, Mirjam Oosterman, Anne Tharner, Carlo Schuengel
{"title":"Testing reliability and validity of practitioner-rated parental sensitivity: A novel tool for practice","authors":"Mirte L. Forrer,&nbsp;Mirjam Oosterman,&nbsp;Anne Tharner,&nbsp;Carlo Schuengel","doi":"10.1002/imhj.22102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Improving parental sensitivity is an important objective of interventions to support families. This study examined reliability and validity of parental sensitivity ratings using a novel package of an e-learning tool and an interactive decision tree provided through a mobile application, called the OK! package. Independent raters assessed parental sensitivity using the OK! package (<i>N</i> = 11 raters) and the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales (<i>N</i> = 22 raters) on the basis of videotaped mother-child interactions at 10- or 12-months-old (<i>N</i> = 294) and at 24-months-old (<i>N</i> = 204) from the Dutch longitudinal cohort study Generation<sup>2</sup>. Mothers reported on children's externalizing and internalizing problems and social competence when children were 4 and 7 years old. Results showed excellent single interrater reliability for raters using the OK! package (mean ICC = .79), and strong evidence for convergent validity at 10- or 12-month-old (<i>r</i> = .57) and 24-month-old (<i>r</i> = .65). Prospective associations of neither parental sensitivity rated using the OK! package or the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales with child developmental outcomes were statistically significant (<i>p</i> &gt; .05), with overlapping 95% confidence intervals for both measures. The OK! package provides a promising direction for testing alternatives to current training and instruction modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48026,"journal":{"name":"Infant Mental Health Journal","volume":"45 2","pages":"234-246"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/imhj.22102","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infant Mental Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/imhj.22102","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving parental sensitivity is an important objective of interventions to support families. This study examined reliability and validity of parental sensitivity ratings using a novel package of an e-learning tool and an interactive decision tree provided through a mobile application, called the OK! package. Independent raters assessed parental sensitivity using the OK! package (N = 11 raters) and the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales (N = 22 raters) on the basis of videotaped mother-child interactions at 10- or 12-months-old (N = 294) and at 24-months-old (N = 204) from the Dutch longitudinal cohort study Generation2. Mothers reported on children's externalizing and internalizing problems and social competence when children were 4 and 7 years old. Results showed excellent single interrater reliability for raters using the OK! package (mean ICC = .79), and strong evidence for convergent validity at 10- or 12-month-old (r = .57) and 24-month-old (r = .65). Prospective associations of neither parental sensitivity rated using the OK! package or the NICHD Parental Sensitivity rating scales with child developmental outcomes were statistically significant (p > .05), with overlapping 95% confidence intervals for both measures. The OK! package provides a promising direction for testing alternatives to current training and instruction modalities.

Abstract Image

测试从业人员评定的父母敏感性的可靠性和有效性:一种新的实践工具。
提高父母的敏感性是家庭支持干预的一个重要目标。本研究使用一套新颖的电子学习工具和互动决策树(通过移动应用程序提供),即 "OK!"软件包,对父母敏感性评级的可靠性和有效性进行了研究。独立评分员根据荷兰纵向队列研究 Generation2 中 10 或 12 个月大时(294 人)和 24 个月大时(204 人)的母子互动录像,使用 OK!软件包(11 名评分员)和 NICHD 父母敏感性评分量表(22 名评分员)对父母的敏感性进行了评估。母亲们报告了孩子 4 岁和 7 岁时的外化和内化问题以及社交能力。结果表明,使用 OK!软件包的评定者具有极佳的单一评定者间可靠性(平均 ICC = .79),并且在 10 或 12 个月大时(r = .57)和 24 个月大时(r = .65)具有很强的收敛有效性。使用OK!软件包或NICHD父母敏感性评定量表评定的父母敏感性与儿童发育结果的前瞻性关联均无统计学意义(P > .05),两种测量的95%置信区间重叠。OK!软件包为测试当前培训和指导模式的替代方案提供了一个很有前景的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infant Mental Health Journal
Infant Mental Health Journal PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Infant Mental Health Journal (IMHJ) is the official publication of the World Association for Infant Mental Health (WAIMH) and the Michigan Association for Infant Mental Health (MI-AIMH) and is copyrighted by MI-AIMH. The Infant Mental Health Journal publishes peer-reviewed research articles, literature reviews, program descriptions/evaluations, theoretical/conceptual papers and brief reports (clinical case studies and novel pilot studies) that focus on early social and emotional development and characteristics that influence social-emotional development from relationship-based perspectives. Examples of such influences include attachment relationships, early relationship development, caregiver-infant interactions, infant and early childhood mental health services, contextual and cultural influences on infant/toddler/child and family development, including parental/caregiver psychosocial characteristics and attachment history, prenatal experiences, and biological characteristics in interaction with relational environments that promote optimal social-emotional development or place it at higher risk. Research published in IMHJ focuses on the prenatal-age 5 period and employs relationship-based perspectives in key research questions and interpretation and implications of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信