Lobar Microbleeds in the Posterior Cortical Atrophy Syndrome: A Comparison to Typical Alzheimer's Disease.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Victoria S Pelak, Vishal Krishnan, Stephanie Serva, Peter Pressman, Asher Mahmood, Lily Noteboom, Brianne M Bettcher, Stefan H Sillau, Andrew L Callen, Ashesh A Thaker
{"title":"Lobar Microbleeds in the Posterior Cortical Atrophy Syndrome: A Comparison to Typical Alzheimer's Disease.","authors":"Victoria S Pelak, Vishal Krishnan, Stephanie Serva, Peter Pressman, Asher Mahmood, Lily Noteboom, Brianne M Bettcher, Stefan H Sillau, Andrew L Callen, Ashesh A Thaker","doi":"10.1007/s11910-024-01330-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the study: </strong>Posterior cortical atrophy is a clinico-radiographical syndrome that presents with higher-order visual dysfunction and is most commonly due to Alzheimer's disease. Understanding factors associated with atypical presentations of Alzheimer's disease, such as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), holds promise to shape our understanding of AD pathophysiology. Thus, we aimed to compare MRI evidence of lobar microbleeds (LMBs) in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) syndrome to typical AD (tAD) and to assess and compare MRI evidence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in each group.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We retrospectively collected clinical and MRI data from participants with PCA (n = 26), identified from an institutional PCA registry, and participants with tAD (n = 46) identified from electronic health records from a single institution. LMBs were identified on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI); the Fazekas grade of white matter disease was assessed using FLAIR images, and Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy were applied to all data. The proportion of participants with PCA and LMB (7.7%) was lower than for tAD (47.8%) (p = 0.005). The frequency of \"probable\" CAA was similar in both groups, while \"possible\" CAA was more frequent in tAD (30.4%) than PCA (0%) (p = 0.001). The Fazekas grades were not different between groups. Lobar microbleeds on SWI were not more common in PCA than in typical AD. Clinicopathological investigations are necessary to confirm these findings. The factors that contribute to the posterior cortical atrophy phenotype are unknown.</p>","PeriodicalId":10831,"journal":{"name":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","volume":" ","pages":"27-33"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-024-01330-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of the study: Posterior cortical atrophy is a clinico-radiographical syndrome that presents with higher-order visual dysfunction and is most commonly due to Alzheimer's disease. Understanding factors associated with atypical presentations of Alzheimer's disease, such as posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), holds promise to shape our understanding of AD pathophysiology. Thus, we aimed to compare MRI evidence of lobar microbleeds (LMBs) in posterior cortical atrophy (PCA) syndrome to typical AD (tAD) and to assess and compare MRI evidence of cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) in each group.

Findings: We retrospectively collected clinical and MRI data from participants with PCA (n = 26), identified from an institutional PCA registry, and participants with tAD (n = 46) identified from electronic health records from a single institution. LMBs were identified on susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI); the Fazekas grade of white matter disease was assessed using FLAIR images, and Boston criteria version 2.0 for cerebral amyloid angiopathy were applied to all data. The proportion of participants with PCA and LMB (7.7%) was lower than for tAD (47.8%) (p = 0.005). The frequency of "probable" CAA was similar in both groups, while "possible" CAA was more frequent in tAD (30.4%) than PCA (0%) (p = 0.001). The Fazekas grades were not different between groups. Lobar microbleeds on SWI were not more common in PCA than in typical AD. Clinicopathological investigations are necessary to confirm these findings. The factors that contribute to the posterior cortical atrophy phenotype are unknown.

后皮质萎缩综合征的脑叶微出血:与典型阿尔茨海默病的比较
研究目的后皮质萎缩是一种临床放射学综合征,表现为高阶视觉功能障碍,最常见的原因是阿尔茨海默病。了解与阿尔茨海默病(如后皮质萎缩)非典型表现相关的因素,有望帮助我们理解阿尔茨海默病的病理生理学。因此,我们旨在比较后部皮质萎缩(PCA)综合征和典型阿兹海默症(tAD)的脑叶微出血(LMBs)的磁共振成像证据,并评估和比较每组患者脑淀粉样血管病(CAA)的磁共振成像证据:我们回顾性地收集了PCA患者(26人)和tAD患者(46人)的临床和MRI数据,前者是从PCA登记机构中确认的,后者是从一家机构的电子健康记录中确认的。LMB是通过感度加权成像(SWI)确定的;白质疾病的Fazekas分级是通过FLAIR图像评估的,波士顿标准2.0版的脑淀粉样血管病标准适用于所有数据。患有 PCA 和 LMB 的参与者比例(7.7%)低于 tAD(47.8%)(p = 0.005)。两组中 "可能 "CAA 的发生率相似,而 "可能 "CAA 在 tAD 中的发生率(30.4%)高于 PCA(0%)(p = 0.001)。两组患者的 Fazekas 分级没有差异。SWI上的脑叶微出血在PCA中并不比在典型AD中更常见。有必要进行临床病理学调查以证实这些发现。导致后皮质萎缩表型的因素尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field. By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of neurological disease and disorders. Presents the views of experts on current advances in neurology and neuroscience Gathers and synthesizes important recent papers on the topic Includes reviews of recently published clinical trials, valuable web sites, and commentaries from well-known figures in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信