Kids name the darndest things: confrontation naming in pediatric neuropsychology.

IF 1.6 3区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jared B Hammond, Sydney G Fortner, Jonathan D Lichtenstein
{"title":"Kids name the darndest things: confrontation naming in pediatric neuropsychology.","authors":"Jared B Hammond, Sydney G Fortner, Jonathan D Lichtenstein","doi":"10.1080/09297049.2024.2305500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few confrontation naming tests are designed for pediatric populations. The Children's Visual Naming Test (cVNT; Hamberger et al., 2018) was developed to fill this gap. No independent studies using cVNT with clinical populations have been published to date. We aimed to characterize cVNT performance in a clinical sample and analyze the relationship between cVNT and other neuropsychological tests/constructs. Retrospective data was collected from 126 consecutively referred youth, aged 6-15 years (<i>M</i> = 11.28, <i>SD</i> = 2.80), who underwent clinical neuropsychological evaluation through an academic medical center. Naming under 2 seconds (cVNT-L2) and the summary scores (cVNT-SUM) were lower compared to the normative sample (cVNT-L2: <i>M</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> =-1.30, <i>SD</i> = 2.17; cVNT-SUM: <i>M</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> =-1.26, <i>SD</i> = 2.15). cVNT was related to core verbal abilities, processing speed, and response inhibition. cVNT-L2 and cVNT-SUM, but not naming under 20 seconds, were related to overall intellectual functioning, verbal fluency, and working memory, and were associated with overall attention, processing speed, executive functions, and verbal fluency. The cVNT provides assessment of confrontation naming without downward extension in pediatric neuropsychological assessment. Importantly, cVNT offers variables of higher fidelity to the neural process of naming than previous measures. cVNT may be associated with commonly assessed neuropsychological functions, providing a rapidly effective tool for screening batteries or improving efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":9789,"journal":{"name":"Child Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2024.2305500","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Few confrontation naming tests are designed for pediatric populations. The Children's Visual Naming Test (cVNT; Hamberger et al., 2018) was developed to fill this gap. No independent studies using cVNT with clinical populations have been published to date. We aimed to characterize cVNT performance in a clinical sample and analyze the relationship between cVNT and other neuropsychological tests/constructs. Retrospective data was collected from 126 consecutively referred youth, aged 6-15 years (M = 11.28, SD = 2.80), who underwent clinical neuropsychological evaluation through an academic medical center. Naming under 2 seconds (cVNT-L2) and the summary scores (cVNT-SUM) were lower compared to the normative sample (cVNT-L2: Mz =-1.30, SD = 2.17; cVNT-SUM: Mz =-1.26, SD = 2.15). cVNT was related to core verbal abilities, processing speed, and response inhibition. cVNT-L2 and cVNT-SUM, but not naming under 20 seconds, were related to overall intellectual functioning, verbal fluency, and working memory, and were associated with overall attention, processing speed, executive functions, and verbal fluency. The cVNT provides assessment of confrontation naming without downward extension in pediatric neuropsychological assessment. Importantly, cVNT offers variables of higher fidelity to the neural process of naming than previous measures. cVNT may be associated with commonly assessed neuropsychological functions, providing a rapidly effective tool for screening batteries or improving efficiency.

孩子们会说出最难听的名字:儿科神经心理学中的对抗命名。
针对儿童设计的对抗命名测试寥寥无几。儿童视觉命名测试(cVNT;Hamberger et al.迄今为止,尚未有针对临床人群使用 cVNT 的独立研究发表。我们旨在描述临床样本中 cVNT 的表现,并分析 cVNT 与其他神经心理学测试/结构之间的关系。我们从 126 名连续转诊的青少年中收集了回顾性数据,这些青少年的年龄在 6-15 岁之间(中位数 = 11.28,标准差 = 2.80),他们在一家学术医疗中心接受了临床神经心理学评估。与常模样本相比,2秒内命名(cVNT-L2)和总分(cVNT-SUM)较低(cVNT-L2:Mz =-1.30,SD = 2.17;cVNT-SUM:Mz =-1.26,SD = 2.15)。cVNT-L2 和 cVNT-SUM 与整体智力功能、言语流畅性和工作记忆有关,但与 20 秒内命名无关,并且与整体注意力、处理速度、执行功能和言语流畅性有关。在儿科神经心理学评估中,cVNT 可对对抗命名进行评估,而无需向下延伸。重要的是,与以前的测量方法相比,cVNT 提供的变量对命名的神经过程具有更高的保真度。cVNT 可能与常用的神经心理功能评估相关联,为筛选电池或提高效率提供了一种快速有效的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Child Neuropsychology
Child Neuropsychology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purposes of Child Neuropsychology are to: publish research on the neuropsychological effects of disorders which affect brain functioning in children and adolescents, publish research on the neuropsychological dimensions of development in childhood and adolescence and promote the integration of theory, method and research findings in child/developmental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of Child Neuropsychology is to publish original empirical research. Theoretical and methodological papers and theoretically relevant case studies are welcome. Critical reviews of topics pertinent to child/developmental neuropsychology are encouraged. Emphases of interest include the following: information processing mechanisms; the impact of injury or disease on neuropsychological functioning; behavioral cognitive and pharmacological approaches to treatment/intervention; psychosocial correlates of neuropsychological dysfunction; definitive normative, reliability, and validity studies of psychometric and other procedures used in the neuropsychological assessment of children and adolescents. Articles on both normal and dysfunctional development that are relevant to the aforementioned dimensions are welcome. Multiple approaches (e.g., basic, applied, clinical) and multiple methodologies (e.g., cross-sectional, longitudinal, experimental, multivariate, correlational) are appropriate. Books, media, and software reviews will be published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信