FPGA-friendly compact and efficient AES-like 8 × 8 S-box

IF 1.9 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Ahmet Malal , Cihangir Tezcan
{"title":"FPGA-friendly compact and efficient AES-like 8 × 8 S-box","authors":"Ahmet Malal ,&nbsp;Cihangir Tezcan","doi":"10.1016/j.micpro.2024.105007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>One of the main layers in the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is the substitution layer, where an 8 × 8 S-Box is used 16 times. The substitution layer provides confusion and makes the algorithm resistant to </span>cryptanalysis<span> techniques. Therefore, the security of the algorithm is also highly dependent on this layer. However, the cost of implementing 8 × 8 S-Box on FPGA platforms is considerably higher than other layers of the algorithm. Since S-Boxes are repeatedly used in the algorithm, the cost of the algorithm highly comes from the substitution layer. In 2005, Canright used different extension fields to represent AES S-Box to get FPGA-friendly compact designs. The best optimization proposed by Canright reduced the gate-area of the AES S-Box implementation by 20%.</span></p><p><span>In this study, we use the same optimization methods that Canright used to optimize AES S-Box on hardware platforms. Our purpose is not to optimize AES S-Box; we aim to create another 8 × 8 S-Box which is strong and compact enough for FPGA platforms. We create an 8 × 8 S-Box using the inverse field operation as in the case of AES S-Box. We use another irreducible polynomial to represent the finite field and get an FPGA-friendly compact and efficient 8 × 8 S-Box. The finite field we propose provides the same level of security against cryptanalysis techniques with a 3.125% less gate-area on Virtex-7 and Artix-7 FPGAs compared to Canright’s results. Moreover, our proposed S-Box requires 11.76% less gate on Virtex-4 FPGAs. These gate-area improvements are beneficial for resource-constraint </span>IoT<span> devices and allow more copies of the S-Box for algorithm parallelism. Therefore, we claim that our proposed S-Box is more compact and efficient than AES S-Box. Cryptographers who need an 8 × 8 S-Box can use our proposed S-Box in their designs instead of AES S-Box with the same level of security but better efficiency.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49815,"journal":{"name":"Microprocessors and Microsystems","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 105007"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microprocessors and Microsystems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141933124000024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the main layers in the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) is the substitution layer, where an 8 × 8 S-Box is used 16 times. The substitution layer provides confusion and makes the algorithm resistant to cryptanalysis techniques. Therefore, the security of the algorithm is also highly dependent on this layer. However, the cost of implementing 8 × 8 S-Box on FPGA platforms is considerably higher than other layers of the algorithm. Since S-Boxes are repeatedly used in the algorithm, the cost of the algorithm highly comes from the substitution layer. In 2005, Canright used different extension fields to represent AES S-Box to get FPGA-friendly compact designs. The best optimization proposed by Canright reduced the gate-area of the AES S-Box implementation by 20%.

In this study, we use the same optimization methods that Canright used to optimize AES S-Box on hardware platforms. Our purpose is not to optimize AES S-Box; we aim to create another 8 × 8 S-Box which is strong and compact enough for FPGA platforms. We create an 8 × 8 S-Box using the inverse field operation as in the case of AES S-Box. We use another irreducible polynomial to represent the finite field and get an FPGA-friendly compact and efficient 8 × 8 S-Box. The finite field we propose provides the same level of security against cryptanalysis techniques with a 3.125% less gate-area on Virtex-7 and Artix-7 FPGAs compared to Canright’s results. Moreover, our proposed S-Box requires 11.76% less gate on Virtex-4 FPGAs. These gate-area improvements are beneficial for resource-constraint IoT devices and allow more copies of the S-Box for algorithm parallelism. Therefore, we claim that our proposed S-Box is more compact and efficient than AES S-Box. Cryptographers who need an 8 × 8 S-Box can use our proposed S-Box in their designs instead of AES S-Box with the same level of security but better efficiency.

适合 FPGA 的紧凑高效 AES 类 8 × 8 S-box
高级加密标准(AES)的主要层之一是替换层,其中一个 8 × 8 S-Box 要使用 16 次。替换层提供了混淆性,使算法能够抵御密码分析技术。因此,算法的安全性也在很大程度上取决于这一层。然而,在 FPGA 平台上实现 8 × 8 S-Box 的成本远远高于算法的其他层。由于 S-Box 在算法中反复使用,算法的成本主要来自替换层。2005 年,Canright 使用不同的扩展字段来表示 AES S-Box,从而获得了适合 FPGA 的紧凑型设计。在本研究中,我们使用与 Canright 相同的优化方法,在硬件平台上优化 AES S-Box。我们的目的不是优化 AES S-Box,而是创建另一种 8 × 8 S-Box,其强度和紧凑程度足以用于 FPGA 平台。我们使用与 AES S-Box 相同的逆场运算来创建 8 × 8 S-Box。我们使用另一个不可还原多项式来表示有限域,从而得到一个适合 FPGA 的紧凑高效的 8 × 8 S-Box。与 Canright 的研究结果相比,我们提出的有限域在 Virtex-7 和 Artix-7 FPGA 上的门区面积减少了 3.125%,却能提供相同级别的密码分析技术安全性。此外,我们提出的 S-Box 在 Virtex-4 FPGA 上所需的门面积减少了 11.76%。这些门区改进有利于资源受限的物联网设备,并允许更多的 S-Box 副本用于算法并行化。因此,我们认为我们提出的 S-Box 比 AES S-Box 更紧凑、更高效。需要 8 × 8 S-Box 的密码设计者可以在他们的设计中使用我们提出的 S-Box 代替 AES S-Box,不仅安全等级相同,而且效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microprocessors and Microsystems
Microprocessors and Microsystems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
3.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
172 days
期刊介绍: Microprocessors and Microsystems: Embedded Hardware Design (MICPRO) is a journal covering all design and architectural aspects related to embedded systems hardware. This includes different embedded system hardware platforms ranging from custom hardware via reconfigurable systems and application specific processors to general purpose embedded processors. Special emphasis is put on novel complex embedded architectures, such as systems on chip (SoC), systems on a programmable/reconfigurable chip (SoPC) and multi-processor systems on a chip (MPSoC), as well as, their memory and communication methods and structures, such as network-on-chip (NoC). Design automation of such systems including methodologies, techniques, flows and tools for their design, as well as, novel designs of hardware components fall within the scope of this journal. Novel cyber-physical applications that use embedded systems are also central in this journal. While software is not in the main focus of this journal, methods of hardware/software co-design, as well as, application restructuring and mapping to embedded hardware platforms, that consider interplay between software and hardware components with emphasis on hardware, are also in the journal scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信