Autonomous stores: How levels of in-store automation affect store patronage

IF 8 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sabine Benoit , Birgit Altrichter , Dhruv Grewal , Carl-Philip Ahlbom
{"title":"Autonomous stores: How levels of in-store automation affect store patronage","authors":"Sabine Benoit ,&nbsp;Birgit Altrichter ,&nbsp;Dhruv Grewal ,&nbsp;Carl-Philip Ahlbom","doi":"10.1016/j.jretai.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Autonomous stores operate without needing on-site staff present to support and monitor customers. This study seeks to determine which autonomous stores are most likely to succeed. By adapting convenience theory and drawing on secondary and qualitative data, the authors identify unique features of autonomous stores that constitute convenience dimensions: options for check-in (access convenience), staff support (assistance convenience), check-out (transaction convenience), and to allow customers to check their itemized baskets (verification convenience). Perceptions of convenience, autonomy, and safety explain the influences of unique store features. A conjoint experiment provides a test of the direct effects of each dimension on store patronage and indirect effects through convenience, autonomy, and safety perceptions. The results indicate that, with the exception of check-out, consumers prefer staffed stores; having to check in (e.g., with a credit card), limited access to (remote) staff, and an inability to verify the basket before payment represent significant barriers. In turn, some trade-offs arise: Store features that increase convenience and autonomy undermine safety perceptions. Finally, community-based and rural locations are better suited for autonomous stores than anonymous traffic hubs. Retail managers can leverage these findings to decide whether to establish autonomous stores and, if so, with which design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Retailing","volume":"100 2","pages":"Pages 217-238"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435923000738/pdfft?md5=8f6ffceed88320dbba0d202464a3caca&pid=1-s2.0-S0022435923000738-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Retailing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022435923000738","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Autonomous stores operate without needing on-site staff present to support and monitor customers. This study seeks to determine which autonomous stores are most likely to succeed. By adapting convenience theory and drawing on secondary and qualitative data, the authors identify unique features of autonomous stores that constitute convenience dimensions: options for check-in (access convenience), staff support (assistance convenience), check-out (transaction convenience), and to allow customers to check their itemized baskets (verification convenience). Perceptions of convenience, autonomy, and safety explain the influences of unique store features. A conjoint experiment provides a test of the direct effects of each dimension on store patronage and indirect effects through convenience, autonomy, and safety perceptions. The results indicate that, with the exception of check-out, consumers prefer staffed stores; having to check in (e.g., with a credit card), limited access to (remote) staff, and an inability to verify the basket before payment represent significant barriers. In turn, some trade-offs arise: Store features that increase convenience and autonomy undermine safety perceptions. Finally, community-based and rural locations are better suited for autonomous stores than anonymous traffic hubs. Retail managers can leverage these findings to decide whether to establish autonomous stores and, if so, with which design.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自主商店:店内自动化水平如何影响顾客光顾率
自主商店的运营不需要现场工作人员为顾客提供支持和监督。本研究旨在确定哪些自主商店最有可能取得成功。通过对便利性理论进行调整,并利用二手数据和定性数据,作者确定了构成便利性维度的自主商店的独特特征:签到选择(进入便利性)、员工支持(协助便利性)、结账(交易便利性),以及允许顾客检查其分项购物篮(验证便利性)。对便利性、自主性和安全性的认知解释了独特商店特征的影响因素。联合实验检验了每个维度对商店顾客光顾率的直接影响,以及通过对便利性、自主性和安全性的感知产生的间接影响。结果表明,除结账外,消费者更喜欢有工作人员的商店;必须办理登记手续(如使用信用卡)、与(远程)工作人员接触受限以及无法在付款前验证购物篮都是重大障碍。这就产生了一些权衡:增加便利性和自主性的商店功能会损害人们的安全感。最后,与匿名的交通枢纽相比,社区和农村地区更适合开设自主商店。零售管理者可以利用这些发现来决定是否建立自主商店,以及如果建立,采用何种设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: The focus of The Journal of Retailing is to advance knowledge and its practical application in the field of retailing. This includes various aspects such as retail management, evolution, and current theories. The journal covers both products and services in retail, supply chains and distribution channels that serve retailers, relationships between retailers and supply chain members, and direct marketing as well as emerging electronic markets for households. Articles published in the journal may take an economic or behavioral approach, but all are based on rigorous analysis and a deep understanding of relevant theories and existing literature. Empirical research follows the scientific method, employing modern sampling procedures and statistical analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信