Misinterpreted Figure in Hemingway’s “Indian Camp” —Doctor Adams

Li-hua Huang
{"title":"Misinterpreted Figure in Hemingway’s “Indian Camp” —Doctor Adams","authors":"Li-hua Huang","doi":"10.17265/2159-5836/2023.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the publication of Hemingway’s “Indian Camp” in 1924, many scholars has considered Doctor Adams to be insensitive, cold-hearted, ethically immoral. Some others labeled him as a racist and a sexist. After a scrupulous and strenuous close reading together with extensive reviewing and analyzing of relevant references, the author of this paper finds that Uncle George has always been misinterpreted over the time. This paper aims to point out the misunderstanding, misinterpretation or even distortion in the previous researches, in an attempt to defend for Doctor Adams and put the record straight.","PeriodicalId":133236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literature and Art Studies","volume":"375 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literature and Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/2159-5836/2023.10.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the publication of Hemingway’s “Indian Camp” in 1924, many scholars has considered Doctor Adams to be insensitive, cold-hearted, ethically immoral. Some others labeled him as a racist and a sexist. After a scrupulous and strenuous close reading together with extensive reviewing and analyzing of relevant references, the author of this paper finds that Uncle George has always been misinterpreted over the time. This paper aims to point out the misunderstanding, misinterpretation or even distortion in the previous researches, in an attempt to defend for Doctor Adams and put the record straight.
海明威《印第安人营地》中被误读的人物--亚当斯医生
自 1924 年海明威的《印第安人营地》出版以来,许多学者认为亚当斯医生麻木不仁、冷酷无情、道德败坏。还有一些人给他贴上了种族主义者和性别歧视者的标签。本文作者经过认真仔细的阅读,并广泛查阅和分析相关参考文献,发现《乔治舅舅》一直以来都被误读。本文旨在指出前人研究中的误解、曲解甚至歪曲,试图为亚当斯博士辩护,以正视听。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信