What capabilities are required for facilitators to support student pharmacists effectively during experiential learning (EL) in Scotland? – Part 2

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Peter Hamilton, A. Power, A. Boyter, Brian Addison, Sean McAleer
{"title":"What capabilities are required for facilitators to support student pharmacists effectively during experiential learning (EL) in Scotland? – Part 2","authors":"Peter Hamilton, A. Power, A. Boyter, Brian Addison, Sean McAleer","doi":"10.46542/pe.2023.231.813824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A key outcome of the changes to the Standards for Initial Education and Training of Pharmacists in Great Britain is to increase the quantity and quality of Experiential Learning (EL) in the MPharm programme. A companion paper described the development of a framework of essential capabilities required of EL facilitators to support quality EL. The aim of this paper was to establish the views of pharmacy stakeholders on the capability framework and suggest further development and potential uses in practice. Methods: Three focus groups were used to gather the views of pharmacy stakeholders with experience in delivering experiential learning. The focus groups were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: The themes from the focus group were categorised into five areas: 1) Overall views of the framework; 2) Perceived reasons for descriptors not reaching consensus; 3) Challenges of using the framework; 4) Potential developments of framework; and 5) Potential uses of the framework in practice. Conclusion: Given the current changes in the initial education and training of pharmacists, this research provides evidence of the value the framework provided on the role of an EL facilitator while outlining the need for refinements to encourage acceptability by stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":19944,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacy Education","volume":"8 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacy Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46542/pe.2023.231.813824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A key outcome of the changes to the Standards for Initial Education and Training of Pharmacists in Great Britain is to increase the quantity and quality of Experiential Learning (EL) in the MPharm programme. A companion paper described the development of a framework of essential capabilities required of EL facilitators to support quality EL. The aim of this paper was to establish the views of pharmacy stakeholders on the capability framework and suggest further development and potential uses in practice. Methods: Three focus groups were used to gather the views of pharmacy stakeholders with experience in delivering experiential learning. The focus groups were transcribed and analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: The themes from the focus group were categorised into five areas: 1) Overall views of the framework; 2) Perceived reasons for descriptors not reaching consensus; 3) Challenges of using the framework; 4) Potential developments of framework; and 5) Potential uses of the framework in practice. Conclusion: Given the current changes in the initial education and training of pharmacists, this research provides evidence of the value the framework provided on the role of an EL facilitator while outlining the need for refinements to encourage acceptability by stakeholders.
在苏格兰的体验式学习(EL)过程中,指导者需要具备哪些能力才能为学生药剂师提供有效支持?- 第二部分
背景:英国药剂师初始教育与培训标准》改革的一个重要成果是提高了药剂学硕士课程中体验式学习(EL)的数量和质量。一份配套文件介绍了为支持高质量的体验式学习而制定的体验式学习促进者基本能力框架。本文旨在了解药剂学利益相关者对能力框架的看法,并就进一步发展和在实践中的潜在用途提出建议。方法:通过三个焦点小组,收集具有体验式学习经验的药学相关人员的意见。采用主题内容分析法对焦点小组进行了记录和分析。结果焦点小组的主题分为五个方面:1) 对该框架的总体看法;2) 认为描述符未达成共识的原因;3) 使用该框架的挑战;4) 框架的潜在发展;5) 框架在实践中的潜在用途。结论:鉴于当前药剂师初始教育和培训的变化,本研究证明了该框架对英语语言学促进者角色的价值,同时概述了为鼓励利益相关者接受而进行改进的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmacy Education
Pharmacy Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
174
期刊介绍: Pharmacy Education journal provides a research, development and evaluation forum for communication between academic teachers, researchers and practitioners in professional and pharmacy education, with an emphasis on new and established teaching and learning methods, new curriculum and syllabus directions, educational outcomes, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and workforce development. It is a peer-reviewed online open access platform for the dissemination of new ideas in professional pharmacy education and workforce development. Pharmacy Education supports Open Access (OA): free, unrestricted online access to research outputs. Readers are able to access the Journal and individual published articles for free - there are no subscription fees or ''pay per view'' charges. Authors wishing to publish their work in Pharmacy Education do so without incurring any financial costs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信