Revisiting Entrepreneurship as Emancipation: Learning from subalternized women in post-revolutionary Tunisia

IF 4.9 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
Amira Benali, Florence Villesèche
{"title":"Revisiting Entrepreneurship as Emancipation: Learning from subalternized women in post-revolutionary Tunisia","authors":"Amira Benali, Florence Villesèche","doi":"10.1177/01708406231225043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we investigate how women beneficiaries in a social enterprise in post-revolutionary Tunisia are agents in their emancipation, including through infrapolitical tactics. We conceptualize their position as beneficiaries as a form of subalternity induced from social, economic and political injustice. We deploy the extended case method in a Tunisian ecotourism social enterprise, connecting the micro-level experiences of the women beneficiaries to the macro-level context. Our findings show how beneficiaries engage in three forms of emancipation: Affirming their dreams; Navigating gender relations; and Defending their interests. We thus contribute to existing research by theoretically extending the emancipation–entrepreneurship locus beyond the lead entrepreneur. We also contribute by extending our understanding of subalternized people’s resistance repertoire beyond the hidden vs public resistance dichotomy. Finally, we challenge the representation of ‘subalterns’ as a homogenous and passive category by showing the intersectional differences that affect these women’s agentic possibilities and, thus, their pathways to emancipation.","PeriodicalId":48423,"journal":{"name":"Organization Studies","volume":"16 5part1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231225043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we investigate how women beneficiaries in a social enterprise in post-revolutionary Tunisia are agents in their emancipation, including through infrapolitical tactics. We conceptualize their position as beneficiaries as a form of subalternity induced from social, economic and political injustice. We deploy the extended case method in a Tunisian ecotourism social enterprise, connecting the micro-level experiences of the women beneficiaries to the macro-level context. Our findings show how beneficiaries engage in three forms of emancipation: Affirming their dreams; Navigating gender relations; and Defending their interests. We thus contribute to existing research by theoretically extending the emancipation–entrepreneurship locus beyond the lead entrepreneur. We also contribute by extending our understanding of subalternized people’s resistance repertoire beyond the hidden vs public resistance dichotomy. Finally, we challenge the representation of ‘subalterns’ as a homogenous and passive category by showing the intersectional differences that affect these women’s agentic possibilities and, thus, their pathways to emancipation.
重新审视作为解放的创业精神:向革命后突尼斯的次等化妇女学习
在这篇文章中,我们研究了革命后突尼斯一家社会企业的女性受益人是如何通过非政治策略等方式推动自身解放的。我们将她们作为受益人的地位概念化为一种因社会、经济和政治不公正而产生的次等地位。我们在突尼斯一家生态旅游社会企业中采用了扩展案例法,将女性受益人的微观经验与宏观背景联系起来。我们的研究结果表明了受益人如何参与三种形式的解放:肯定自己的梦想;驾驭性别关系;捍卫自己的利益。因此,我们从理论上将解放-创业定位扩展到主要创业者之外,为现有研究做出了贡献。此外,我们还将对处于次等地位的人们的反抗方式的理解扩展到了隐性反抗与公开反抗的二分法之外。最后,我们挑战了将 "次边缘人 "视为同质和被动类别的观点,展示了影响这些妇女的代理可能性的交叉差异,以及她们获得解放的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Organization Studies
Organization Studies MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Organisation Studies (OS) aims to promote the understanding of organizations, organizing and the organized, and the social relevance of that understanding. It encourages the interplay between theorizing and empirical research, in the belief that they should be mutually informative. It is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal which is open to contributions of high quality, from any perspective relevant to the field and from any country. Organization Studies is, in particular, a supranational journal which gives special attention to national and cultural similarities and differences worldwide. This is reflected by its international editorial board and publisher and its collaboration with EGOS, the European Group for Organizational Studies. OS publishes papers that fully or partly draw on empirical data to make their contribution to organization theory and practice. Thus, OS welcomes work that in any form draws on empirical work to make strong theoretical and empirical contributions. If your paper is not drawing on empirical data in any form, we advise you to submit your work to Organization Theory – another journal under the auspices of the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) – instead.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信