Comparing the effects of decreasing prescription opioid shipments and the release of an abuse deterrent OxyContin formulation on opioid overdose fatalities in WV: an interrupted time series study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Eric W Lundstrom, Zheng Dai, Caroline P Groth, Brian Hendricks, Erin L Winstanley, Marie Abate, Gordon S Smith
{"title":"Comparing the effects of decreasing prescription opioid shipments and the release of an abuse deterrent OxyContin formulation on opioid overdose fatalities in WV: an interrupted time series study.","authors":"Eric W Lundstrom, Zheng Dai, Caroline P Groth, Brian Hendricks, Erin L Winstanley, Marie Abate, Gordon S Smith","doi":"10.1186/s13011-023-00587-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2010 release of an abuse deterrent formulation (ADF) of OxyContin, a brand name prescription opioid, has been cited as a major driver for the reduction in prescription drug misuse and the associated increasing illicit opioid use and overdose rates. However, studies of this topic often do not account for changes in supplies of other prescription opioids that were widely prescribed before and after the ADF OxyContin release, including generic oxycodone formulations and hydrocodone. We therefore sought to compare the impact of the ADF OxyContin release to that of decreasing prescription opioid supplies in West Virginia (WV).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Opioid tablet shipment and overdose data were extracted from The Washington Post ARCOS (2006-2014) and the WV Forensic Drug Database (2005-2020), respectively. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) was used to estimate the point when shipments of prescription opioids to WV began decreasing, measured via dosage units and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to compare the impact LOESS-identified prescription supply changes and the ADF OxyContin release had on prescription (oxycodone and hydrocodone) and illicit (heroin, fentanyl, and fentanyl analogues) opioid overdose deaths in WV. Model fit was compared using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of opioid tablets shipped to WV from 2006 to 2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone, not OxyContin. After accounting for a 6-month lag from ITSA models using the LOESS-identified change in prescription opioid shipments measured via dosage units (2011 Q3) resulted in the lowest AIC for both prescription (AIC = -188.6) and illicit opioid-involved overdoses (AIC = -189.4), indicating this intervention start date resulted in the preferred model. The second lowest AIC was for models using the ADF OxyContin release as an intervention start date.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We found that illicit opioid overdoses in WV began increasing closer to when prescription opioid shipments to the state began decreasing, not when the ADF OxyContin release occurred. Similarly, the majority of opioid tablets shipped to the state for 2006-2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone. This may indicate that diminishing prescription supplies had a larger impact on opioid overdose patterns than the ADF OxyContin release in WV.</p>","PeriodicalId":22041,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","volume":"19 1","pages":"4"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10768117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-023-00587-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The 2010 release of an abuse deterrent formulation (ADF) of OxyContin, a brand name prescription opioid, has been cited as a major driver for the reduction in prescription drug misuse and the associated increasing illicit opioid use and overdose rates. However, studies of this topic often do not account for changes in supplies of other prescription opioids that were widely prescribed before and after the ADF OxyContin release, including generic oxycodone formulations and hydrocodone. We therefore sought to compare the impact of the ADF OxyContin release to that of decreasing prescription opioid supplies in West Virginia (WV).

Methods: Opioid tablet shipment and overdose data were extracted from The Washington Post ARCOS (2006-2014) and the WV Forensic Drug Database (2005-2020), respectively. Locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) was used to estimate the point when shipments of prescription opioids to WV began decreasing, measured via dosage units and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) was used to compare the impact LOESS-identified prescription supply changes and the ADF OxyContin release had on prescription (oxycodone and hydrocodone) and illicit (heroin, fentanyl, and fentanyl analogues) opioid overdose deaths in WV. Model fit was compared using Akaike Information Criteria (AIC).

Results: The majority of opioid tablets shipped to WV from 2006 to 2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone, not OxyContin. After accounting for a 6-month lag from ITSA models using the LOESS-identified change in prescription opioid shipments measured via dosage units (2011 Q3) resulted in the lowest AIC for both prescription (AIC = -188.6) and illicit opioid-involved overdoses (AIC = -189.4), indicating this intervention start date resulted in the preferred model. The second lowest AIC was for models using the ADF OxyContin release as an intervention start date.

Discussion: We found that illicit opioid overdoses in WV began increasing closer to when prescription opioid shipments to the state began decreasing, not when the ADF OxyContin release occurred. Similarly, the majority of opioid tablets shipped to the state for 2006-2014 were generic oxycodone or hydrocodone. This may indicate that diminishing prescription supplies had a larger impact on opioid overdose patterns than the ADF OxyContin release in WV.

比较减少处方阿片类药物运输量和发布具有抑制滥用作用的 OxyContin 配方对西弗吉尼亚州阿片类药物过量致死率的影响:一项间断时间序列研究。
导言:2010 年,品牌处方阿片类药物奥施康定(OxyContin)的阻断滥用制剂(ADF)上市,这被认为是减少处方药滥用以及与之相关的阿片类药物非法使用和过量使用率上升的主要原因。然而,对这一问题的研究往往没有考虑到在 ADF OxyContin 发布前后被广泛处方的其他处方类阿片(包括普通羟考酮(Oxycodone)制剂和氢可酮(Hydrocodone))供应量的变化。因此,我们试图比较 ADF OxyContin 投放与西弗吉尼亚州(WV)阿片类处方药供应量下降的影响:方法:阿片类药物片剂运输和用药过量数据分别来自《华盛顿邮报》ARCOS(2006-2014 年)和西弗吉尼亚州法医药物数据库(2005-2020 年)。采用局部估计散点图平滑法(LOESS)估计了西弗吉尼亚州处方类阿片的发货量开始下降的时间点,该时间点通过剂量单位和吗啡毫克当量(MMEs)来衡量。中断时间序列分析(ITSA)用于比较 LOESS 确定的处方供应变化和 ADF OxyContin 释放对西弗吉尼亚州处方(羟考酮和氢可酮)和非法(海洛因、芬太尼和芬太尼类似物)阿片类药物过量死亡的影响。使用阿凯克信息准则(AIC)对模型的拟合度进行了比较:结果:2006 年至 2014 年运往西弗吉尼亚州的阿片类药物片剂大多为普通羟考酮或氢可酮,而非奥施康定。在考虑到 ITSA 模型的 6 个月滞后期后,使用通过剂量单位衡量的 LOESS 确定的处方阿片类药物运输量变化(2011 年第三季度)建立的模型在处方(AIC =-188.6)和非法阿片类药物过量(AIC =-189.4)方面的 AIC 最低,表明该干预开始日期是首选模型。AIC值第二低的是使用ADF奥施康定释放作为干预开始日期的模型:我们发现,西弗吉尼亚州非法阿片类药物过量开始增加的时间更接近于该州处方阿片类药物运输开始减少的时间,而不是 ADF OxyContin 发布的时间。同样,2006-2014 年运往该州的阿片类药片大多是普通的羟考酮或氢可酮。这可能表明,与威斯康星州的 ADF OxyContin 发布相比,处方供应的减少对阿片类药物过量模式的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses research concerning substance abuse, with a focus on policy issues. The journal aims to provide an environment for the exchange of ideas, new research, consensus papers, and critical reviews, to bridge the established fields that share a mutual goal of reducing the harms from substance use. These fields include: legislation pertaining to substance use; correctional supervision of people with substance use disorder; medical treatment and screening; mental health services; research; and evaluation of substance use disorder programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信