{"title":"[Validation of Method for Nitrite Determination in Foods].","authors":"Kyoko Sato, Shoko Terami, Takahiro Sasaki, Hikaru Sakurai, Akira Shimoyama, Haruko Sekido, Shoichi Tahara, Takahiko Hara, Takudo Ito, Shinji Yamamoto, Mika Yoshida, Takahiro Watanabe, Chiye Tatebe, Hiroki Kubota, Atsuko Tada","doi":"10.3358/shokueishi.64.240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In general, nitrite in food is extracted under slightly alkaline conditions, deproteinized, and analyzed by a colorimetric method using color development by diazotization. However, depending on the sample, the sample solution may become cloudy and difficult to filter by the deproteinization treatment of the analytical method. Recently, an improved analytical method that solves these problems has been reported. Therefore, a validation study was performed on the improved analytical method was performed. The concentrations of sodium nitrite added to cod roe, fish sausage, and ham, which were not labeled with sodium nitrite, were set at the upper limits of the standards for use. We set the target values of 70-120% for trueness, less than 15% for intralaboratory reproducibility, and less than intralaboratory reproducibility for repeatability. As a result, the target values were met for the three samples verified: 88-92% for trueness, 2.0-3.0% for repeatability, and 3.2-4.3% for intralaboratory reproducibility. In addition, an interlaboratory study was conducted by eight institutes on the improved analytical method for nitrite. At each institution, sodium nitrite was added to the same three samples as in the validation study, at concentrations equivalent to twice the lower limit of quantification and the upper limit of the standards for use and analyzed in triplicate. The estimated trueness from the obtained analyses ranged from 82 to 95%, the repeatability ranged from 2.3 to 5.8%, and the inter-room reproducibility ranged from 3.5 to 11%. Thus, the improved analytical method could be useful for determining nitrite in foods.</p>","PeriodicalId":54373,"journal":{"name":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","volume":"64 6","pages":"240-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Hygiene and Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3358/shokueishi.64.240","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In general, nitrite in food is extracted under slightly alkaline conditions, deproteinized, and analyzed by a colorimetric method using color development by diazotization. However, depending on the sample, the sample solution may become cloudy and difficult to filter by the deproteinization treatment of the analytical method. Recently, an improved analytical method that solves these problems has been reported. Therefore, a validation study was performed on the improved analytical method was performed. The concentrations of sodium nitrite added to cod roe, fish sausage, and ham, which were not labeled with sodium nitrite, were set at the upper limits of the standards for use. We set the target values of 70-120% for trueness, less than 15% for intralaboratory reproducibility, and less than intralaboratory reproducibility for repeatability. As a result, the target values were met for the three samples verified: 88-92% for trueness, 2.0-3.0% for repeatability, and 3.2-4.3% for intralaboratory reproducibility. In addition, an interlaboratory study was conducted by eight institutes on the improved analytical method for nitrite. At each institution, sodium nitrite was added to the same three samples as in the validation study, at concentrations equivalent to twice the lower limit of quantification and the upper limit of the standards for use and analyzed in triplicate. The estimated trueness from the obtained analyses ranged from 82 to 95%, the repeatability ranged from 2.3 to 5.8%, and the inter-room reproducibility ranged from 3.5 to 11%. Thus, the improved analytical method could be useful for determining nitrite in foods.