Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Emre Alataş, Handan Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, Hilal Tanyıldızı, Goksel Alcın
{"title":"Treatment prediction with machine learning in prostate cancer patients.","authors":"Emre Alataş, Handan Tanyıldızı Kökkülünk, Hilal Tanyıldızı, Goksel Alcın","doi":"10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUV<sub>max</sub>, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30), radiotherapy(<i>n</i> = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(<i>n</i> = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":50640,"journal":{"name":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","volume":" ","pages":"572-580"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2023.2298364","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are various treatment modalities for prostate cancer, which has a high incidence. In this study, it is aimed to make predictions with machine learning in order to determine the optimal treatment option for prostate cancer patients. The study included 88 male patients diagnosed with prostate cancer. Independent variables were determined as Gleason scores, biopsy, PSA, SUVmax, and age. Prostate cancer treatments, which are dependent variables, were determined as hormone therapy(n = 30), radiotherapy(n = 28) and radiotherapy + hormone therapy(n = 30). Machine learning was carried out in the Python with SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost. Metrics such as accuracy, ROC curve, and AUC were used to evaluate the performance of multi-class predictions. The model with the highest number of successful predictions was the XGBoost. False negative rates for hormone therapy, radiotherapy, and radiotherapy + hormone therapy treatments were, respectively, 12.5, 33.3, and 0%. The accuracy values were computed as 0.61, 0.83, 0.83, 0.72 and 0.89 for SVM, RF, DT, ETC and XGBoost, respectively. The three features that had the greatest influence on the treatment model prediction for prostate cancer with XGBoost were biopsy, Gleason score (3 + 3), and PSA level, respectively. According to the AUC, ROC and accuracy, it was determined that the XGBoost was the model that made the best estimation of prostate cancer treatment. Among the variables biopsy, Gleason score, and PSA level are identified as key variables in prediction of treatment.

利用机器学习对前列腺癌患者进行治疗预测。
前列腺癌发病率高,治疗方法多种多样。本研究旨在利用机器学习进行预测,以确定前列腺癌患者的最佳治疗方案。研究对象包括 88 名确诊为前列腺癌的男性患者。自变量包括格里森评分、活检、PSA、SUVmax 和年龄。作为因变量的前列腺癌治疗方法被确定为激素疗法(n = 30)、放射疗法(n = 28)和放射疗法+激素疗法(n = 30)。在 Python 中使用 SVM、RF、DT、ETC 和 XGBoost 进行了机器学习。准确率、ROC 曲线和 AUC 等指标用于评估多类预测的性能。预测成功率最高的模型是 XGBoost。激素疗法、放疗和放疗+激素疗法的假阴性率分别为 12.5%、33.3% 和 0%。SVM、RF、DT、ETC 和 XGBoost 的准确率分别为 0.61、0.83、0.83、0.72 和 0.89。对 XGBoost 预测前列腺癌治疗模型影响最大的三个特征分别是活检、Gleason 评分(3 + 3)和 PSA 水平。根据AUC、ROC和准确率,可以确定XGBoost是对前列腺癌治疗做出最佳估计的模型。在这些变量中,活检、格里森评分和 PSA 水平被认为是预测治疗的关键变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
179
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The primary aims of Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering are to provide a means of communicating the advances being made in the areas of biomechanics and biomedical engineering and to stimulate interest in the continually emerging computer based technologies which are being applied in these multidisciplinary subjects. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering will also provide a focus for the importance of integrating the disciplines of engineering with medical technology and clinical expertise. Such integration will have a major impact on health care in the future.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信