How do cytopathologists learn fine needle aspiration techniques? An international survey.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CELL BIOLOGY
Cytopathology Pub Date : 2023-12-26 DOI:10.1111/cyt.13352
Eduardo Alcaraz-Mateos, Idaira Jael Exposito-Afonso, Tania Labiano-Miravalles, Lara Pijuan, Jordi Temprana-Salvador, Qing Zhao, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang
{"title":"How do cytopathologists learn fine needle aspiration techniques? An international survey.","authors":"Eduardo Alcaraz-Mateos, Idaira Jael Exposito-Afonso, Tania Labiano-Miravalles, Lara Pijuan, Jordi Temprana-Salvador, Qing Zhao, Xiaoyin Sara Jiang","doi":"10.1111/cyt.13352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted diagnostic technique, but performance varies according to expertise. Little is known about variation in FNAC training practices worldwide. We surveyed pathologists using social media networks to determine FNAC training practices internationally.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pathologists were surveyed on questions related to FNAC simulation training using direct messaging on the Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. Survey responses over a period of 2 weeks were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 149 pathologists participated (96.1% response rate). The respondents came from 24 countries and 87 institutions. The majority of the pathologists (63.8%) performed FNAC directly on patients for the first time. Only 36.2% of them had simulation instruction during their training. It was performed on food items such as fruit (64.8%), surgical specimens (37.0%), autopsies (13.0%) and others (9.3%), including commercially available phantom simulators for ultrasound-guided FNAC (US-FNAC) (two pathologists).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Most pathologists did not receive formal training in a simulated environment, and of the pathologists who had simulation instruction, food items were commonly used for education. A few participants used a commercial US-FNAC simulator, but since most pathologists perform FNAC by palpation, this method of simulation training is not applicable to many practices. Social media is an effective and efficient way to perform survey research, yielding a very high response rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":55187,"journal":{"name":"Cytopathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.13352","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a widely accepted diagnostic technique, but performance varies according to expertise. Little is known about variation in FNAC training practices worldwide. We surveyed pathologists using social media networks to determine FNAC training practices internationally.

Design: Pathologists were surveyed on questions related to FNAC simulation training using direct messaging on the Twitter and WhatsApp platforms. Survey responses over a period of 2 weeks were collected.

Results: In total, 149 pathologists participated (96.1% response rate). The respondents came from 24 countries and 87 institutions. The majority of the pathologists (63.8%) performed FNAC directly on patients for the first time. Only 36.2% of them had simulation instruction during their training. It was performed on food items such as fruit (64.8%), surgical specimens (37.0%), autopsies (13.0%) and others (9.3%), including commercially available phantom simulators for ultrasound-guided FNAC (US-FNAC) (two pathologists).

Discussion: Most pathologists did not receive formal training in a simulated environment, and of the pathologists who had simulation instruction, food items were commonly used for education. A few participants used a commercial US-FNAC simulator, but since most pathologists perform FNAC by palpation, this method of simulation training is not applicable to many practices. Social media is an effective and efficient way to perform survey research, yielding a very high response rate.

Abstract Image

细胞病理学家如何学习细针穿刺技术?一项国际调查。
导言:细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是一种广为接受的诊断技术,但其效果因专业技术而异。关于全球 FNAC 培训实践的差异,人们知之甚少。我们利用社交媒体网络对病理学家进行了调查,以确定国际上的 FNAC 培训实践:设计:我们使用 Twitter 和 WhatsApp 平台上的直接消息对病理学家进行了有关 FNAC 模拟培训问题的调查。结果:共有 149 名病理学家参与了此次调查:共有 149 名病理学家参与了调查(回复率为 96.1%)。受访者来自 24 个国家和 87 个机构。大多数病理学家(63.8%)都是第一次直接为患者实施 FNAC。只有 36.2% 的病理学家在培训期间接受过模拟教学。病理学家对水果等食品(64.8%)、手术标本(37.0%)、尸体解剖(13.0%)及其他(9.3%)进行了FNAC操作,包括市售的超声引导下FNAC(US-FNAC)模型模拟器(两名病理学家):讨论:大多数病理学家没有在模拟环境中接受过正规培训,在接受过模拟教学的病理学家中,食品通常被用于教学。少数参与者使用了商用 US-FNAC 模拟器,但由于大多数病理学家通过触诊进行 FNAC,因此这种模拟训练方法不适用于许多临床实践。社交媒体是进行调查研究的一种有效且高效的方式,能产生很高的回复率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cytopathology
Cytopathology 生物-病理学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
107
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Cytopathology is to publish articles relating to those aspects of cytology which will increase our knowledge and understanding of the aetiology, diagnosis and management of human disease. It contains original articles and critical reviews on all aspects of clinical cytology in its broadest sense, including: gynaecological and non-gynaecological cytology; fine needle aspiration and screening strategy. Cytopathology welcomes papers and articles on: ultrastructural, histochemical and immunocytochemical studies of the cell; quantitative cytology and DNA hybridization as applied to cytological material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信