Adaptive processing in word production: Evidence from picture-word interference studies.

IF 2.2 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Jörg D Jescheniak, Stefan Wöhner, Herbert Schriefers
{"title":"Adaptive processing in word production: Evidence from picture-word interference studies.","authors":"Jörg D Jescheniak, Stefan Wöhner, Herbert Schriefers","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adaptive models of word production hold that lexical processing is shaped by recent production episodes. In particular, the models proposed by Howard et al. (2006) and Oppenheim et al. (2010) assume that the connection strength between semantic and lexical representations is updated continuously, on each use of a word. These changes make semantically related competitor words to a selected target word (e.g., \"cherry\" or \"grape\" for the target word \"apple\") less accessible for future retrieval. We put this assumption to a novel test in two picture-word interference experiments. The experiments looked at semantic interference (longer picture naming latencies in the presence of a semantically related distractor word compared to an unrelated distractor word; the effect is assumed to reflect the activation of competitor words to a target word) and its development across repeated naming. Across two times of measurement, semantically related distractor words (and their unrelated controls) were either identical (fixed target-distractor mapping, e.g., either distractor \"cherry\" or distractor \"grape\" for the target word \"apple\" at both times of measurement) or different (variable target-distractor mapping, e.g., distractor \"cherry\" at first time of measurement and distractor \"grape\" at second time of measurement or vice versa). Semantic interference was reduced at the second time of measurement, and this reduction was found with both fixed and variable target-distractor mapping. This generalization to new target-distractor combinations provides strong novel support for the notion of production-dependent changes in lexical accessibility as captured by adaptive models of word production. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":50194,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001316","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adaptive models of word production hold that lexical processing is shaped by recent production episodes. In particular, the models proposed by Howard et al. (2006) and Oppenheim et al. (2010) assume that the connection strength between semantic and lexical representations is updated continuously, on each use of a word. These changes make semantically related competitor words to a selected target word (e.g., "cherry" or "grape" for the target word "apple") less accessible for future retrieval. We put this assumption to a novel test in two picture-word interference experiments. The experiments looked at semantic interference (longer picture naming latencies in the presence of a semantically related distractor word compared to an unrelated distractor word; the effect is assumed to reflect the activation of competitor words to a target word) and its development across repeated naming. Across two times of measurement, semantically related distractor words (and their unrelated controls) were either identical (fixed target-distractor mapping, e.g., either distractor "cherry" or distractor "grape" for the target word "apple" at both times of measurement) or different (variable target-distractor mapping, e.g., distractor "cherry" at first time of measurement and distractor "grape" at second time of measurement or vice versa). Semantic interference was reduced at the second time of measurement, and this reduction was found with both fixed and variable target-distractor mapping. This generalization to new target-distractor combinations provides strong novel support for the notion of production-dependent changes in lexical accessibility as captured by adaptive models of word production. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

单词生成中的适应性加工:图片-文字干扰研究的证据。
词汇生成的自适应模型认为,词汇加工是由最近的生成事件形成的。Howard 等人(2006 年)和 Oppenheim 等人(2010 年)提出的模型特别假定,语义表征和词汇表征之间的连接强度在每次使用一个词时都会不断更新。这些变化会使与所选目标词(例如,"樱桃 "或 "葡萄 "与目标词 "苹果 "的关系)语义相关的竞争词在未来检索时变得不那么容易获取。我们在两个图片-词语干扰实验中对这一假设进行了新颖的测试。实验研究了语义干扰(与不相关的干扰词相比,存在语义相关的干扰词时,图片命名潜伏期更长;假设这种效应反映了目标词的竞争词被激活)及其在重复命名中的发展。在两次测量中,语义相关的分心词(及其不相关的对照词)要么是相同的(固定的目标-分心词映射,例如,在两次测量中,目标词 "苹果 "的分心词 "樱桃 "或分心词 "葡萄"),要么是不同的(可变的目标-分心词映射,例如,第一次测量中的分心词为 "樱桃",第二次测量中的分心词为 "葡萄",反之亦然)。在第二次测量时,语义干扰减少了,而且这种减少在固定和可变的目标-分隔符映射中都有发现。这种对新的目标-ractor组合的泛化,为适应性造词模型所捕捉到的词汇可及性依赖于生产的变化这一概念提供了强有力的新支持。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition publishes studies on perception, control of action, perceptual aspects of language processing, and related cognitive processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信