The Clinical, Molecular, and Prognostic Features of the 2022 WHO and ICC Classification Systems for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vishesh Khanna, Rong Lu, Jyoti Kumar, Alfonso Molina, Henning Stehr, Elizabeth Spiteri, Michael Spinner, Oscar Silva, Sebastian Fernandez-Pol, Brent Tan, Peter L. Greenberg
{"title":"The Clinical, Molecular, and Prognostic Features of the 2022 WHO and ICC Classification Systems for Myelodysplastic Neoplasms","authors":"Vishesh Khanna, Rong Lu, Jyoti Kumar, Alfonso Molina, Henning Stehr, Elizabeth Spiteri, Michael Spinner, Oscar Silva, Sebastian Fernandez-Pol, Brent Tan, Peter L. Greenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are clonal disorders of bone marrow failure exhibiting a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. MDS exhibit certain prognostic genetic or cytogenetic abnormalities, an observation that has led to both the pathologic reclassification of MDS in the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) systems, as well as to an updated prognostic schema, the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M). This single-institution study characterized the molecular patterns and clinical outcomes associated with the 2022 WHO and ICC classification schemas to assess their clinical utility. Strikingly, with the exception of one individual, all 210 patients in our cohort were classified into analogous categories by the two pathologic/diagnostic schemas. Most patients (70%) were classified morphologically while the remaining 30% had genetically classified disease by both criteria. Prognostic risk, as assessed by the IPSS-M score was highest in patients with MDS with biallelic/multi-hit <em>TP53</em> mutations and lowest in pts with MDS-<em>SF3B1</em>. Median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was shortest for those with MDS with biallelic/multi-hit <em>TP53</em> (0.7 years) and longest for those with MDS with low blasts (LFS not reached). These data demonstrate the clear ability of the 2022 WHO and ICC classifications to organize MDS patients into distinct prognostic risk groups and further show that both classification systems share more similarities than differences. Incorporation of the IPSS-M and IPSS-R features provide additive prognostic and survival components to both the WHO and ICC classifications, which together enhance their utility for evaluating and treating MDS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":18051,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2023.107433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) are clonal disorders of bone marrow failure exhibiting a variable risk of progression to acute myeloid leukemia. MDS exhibit certain prognostic genetic or cytogenetic abnormalities, an observation that has led to both the pathologic reclassification of MDS in the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) systems, as well as to an updated prognostic schema, the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M). This single-institution study characterized the molecular patterns and clinical outcomes associated with the 2022 WHO and ICC classification schemas to assess their clinical utility. Strikingly, with the exception of one individual, all 210 patients in our cohort were classified into analogous categories by the two pathologic/diagnostic schemas. Most patients (70%) were classified morphologically while the remaining 30% had genetically classified disease by both criteria. Prognostic risk, as assessed by the IPSS-M score was highest in patients with MDS with biallelic/multi-hit TP53 mutations and lowest in pts with MDS-SF3B1. Median leukemia-free survival (LFS) was shortest for those with MDS with biallelic/multi-hit TP53 (0.7 years) and longest for those with MDS with low blasts (LFS not reached). These data demonstrate the clear ability of the 2022 WHO and ICC classifications to organize MDS patients into distinct prognostic risk groups and further show that both classification systems share more similarities than differences. Incorporation of the IPSS-M and IPSS-R features provide additive prognostic and survival components to both the WHO and ICC classifications, which together enhance their utility for evaluating and treating MDS patients.

2022 年骨髓增生异常肿瘤 WHO 和 ICC 分类系统的临床、分子和预后特征
骨髓增生异常性肿瘤(MDS)是骨髓衰竭的克隆性疾病,发展为急性髓性白血病的风险各不相同。MDS表现出某些预后遗传学或细胞遗传学异常,这一观察结果导致2022年世界卫生组织(WHO)和国际共识分类(ICC)系统对MDS进行了病理学重新分类,并更新了预后模式,即分子国际预后评分系统(IPSS-M)。这项单一机构研究描述了与 2022 年 WHO 和 ICC 分类模式相关的分子模式和临床结果,以评估其临床实用性。令人震惊的是,除一人外,我们队列中的所有210名患者都被这两种病理/诊断方案归入了类似的类别。大多数患者(70%)是按形态学分类的,而其余 30% 的患者则是按基因学分类的。根据 IPSS-M 评分评估,具有双拷贝/多拷贝 TP53 突变的 MDS 患者的预后风险最高,而 MDS-SF3B1 患者的预后风险最低。 具有双拷贝/多拷贝 TP53 突变的 MDS 患者的中位无白血病生存期(LFS)最短(0.7 年),而具有低胚泡的 MDS 患者的中位无白血病生存期(LFS)最长(未达到)。这些数据表明,2022 年 WHO 和 ICC 分类能将 MDS 患者分为不同的预后风险组,并进一步表明这两种分类系统的相似之处多于不同之处。IPSS-M和IPSS-R特征的纳入为WHO和ICC分类提供了额外的预后和生存成分,共同提高了它们在评估和治疗MDS患者方面的效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leukemia research
Leukemia research 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
3.70%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia Research an international journal which brings comprehensive and current information to all health care professionals involved in basic and applied clinical research in hematological malignancies. The editors encourage the submission of articles relevant to hematological malignancies. The Journal scope includes reporting studies of cellular and molecular biology, genetics, immunology, epidemiology, clinical evaluation, and therapy of these diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信