SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF DEMENTIA FAMILY DYADIC COMMUNICATION: EFFECT OF CAREGIVER DISABLING COMMUNICATION

IF 4.9 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sohyun Kim, Will Chen, Shan Sun-Mitchell
{"title":"SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS OF DEMENTIA FAMILY DYADIC COMMUNICATION: EFFECT OF CAREGIVER DISABLING COMMUNICATION","authors":"Sohyun Kim, Will Chen, Shan Sun-Mitchell","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study examined temporal relationships between antecedent family caregiver disabling communication and subsequent care recipient (persons living with dementia) communication during 75 in-home care video observations. Secondary analysis of 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-second timed-window analysis was conducted. 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Yule’s Q statistics were used. The results showed that care recipient engaging, challenging, and neutral communication occurred at differing frequencies within each time window following disabling communication by family caregivers. Care recipient challenging verbal communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver challenging verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.51 – 1.77, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.204 – 0.277). Care recipient engaging verbal communication was more likely to occur with weaker chance within all time widows except 30-second window after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.11 – 1.17, p = .001 - .028, Yule’s Q = 0.151 – 0.080). Care recipient neutral communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.34 – 1.39, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.144 – 0.162). Care recipient neutral communication more likely occurred within all time widows except 5-second and 10-second windows after caregiver disabling nonverbal communication preceded (OR = 1.28 – 1.34, p =.009 - .029, Yule’s Q = 0.123 – 0.144). Caregiver disabling communication was associated with more likely subsequent care recipient communication. Future research can further explore how participant characteristics and types and frequencies of caregiver communication influence care recipient communication.","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"218 2","pages":"1117 - 1117"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igad104.3586","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This study examined temporal relationships between antecedent family caregiver disabling communication and subsequent care recipient (persons living with dementia) communication during 75 in-home care video observations. Secondary analysis of 5-, 10-, 15-, 20-, 25-, and 30-second timed-window analysis was conducted. 95% confidence intervals, p-values, and Yule’s Q statistics were used. The results showed that care recipient engaging, challenging, and neutral communication occurred at differing frequencies within each time window following disabling communication by family caregivers. Care recipient challenging verbal communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver challenging verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.51 – 1.77, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.204 – 0.277). Care recipient engaging verbal communication was more likely to occur with weaker chance within all time widows except 30-second window after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.11 – 1.17, p = .001 - .028, Yule’s Q = 0.151 – 0.080). Care recipient neutral communication was more likely to occur within all time widows after caregiver disabling verbal communication preceded (OR = 1.34 – 1.39, p <.001, Yule’s Q = 0.144 – 0.162). Care recipient neutral communication more likely occurred within all time widows except 5-second and 10-second windows after caregiver disabling nonverbal communication preceded (OR = 1.28 – 1.34, p =.009 - .029, Yule’s Q = 0.123 – 0.144). Caregiver disabling communication was associated with more likely subsequent care recipient communication. Future research can further explore how participant characteristics and types and frequencies of caregiver communication influence care recipient communication.
痴呆症家庭双向交流的序列分析:照顾者失能性交流的影响
摘要 本研究考察了在 75 个居家护理视频观察中,家庭护理者失能沟通的前因与受护理者(痴呆症患者)沟通的后因之间的时间关系。对 5 秒、10 秒、15 秒、20 秒、25 秒和 30 秒的定时窗口分析进行了二次分析。使用了 95% 置信区间、P 值和 Yule's Q 统计量。结果显示,在家庭照顾者进行失能沟通后的每个时间窗口内,照顾者参与、挑战和中性沟通的频率各不相同。在护理者挑战性言语交流之前,受护理者挑战性言语交流更有可能在所有时间窗口内发生(OR = 1.51 - 1.77,p <.001,Yule's Q = 0.204 - 0.277)。在所有时间范围内,除护理者禁用语言交流之前的 30 秒窗口外,护理接受者参与语言交流的几率更高(OR = 1.11 - 1.17,p = 0.001 - 0.028,Yule's Q = 0.151 - 0.080)。在护理者失能性言语交流之前,护理接受者中性交流更有可能发生在所有时间段内(OR = 1.34 - 1.39,p <.001,Yule's Q = 0.144 - 0.162)。在护理者禁用非语言交流之前,除 5 秒和 10 秒窗口外,护理接受者中性交流更有可能发生在所有时间窗口内(OR = 1.28 - 1.34,p =.009 - 0.029,Yule's Q = 0.123 - 0.144)。护理者的失能性交流与受护理者随后更有可能进行的交流有关。未来的研究可以进一步探讨参与者的特征以及照顾者沟通的类型和频率如何影响受照顾者的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信